Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-03531
Original file (BC-2010-03531.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-03531

XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE

HEARING DESIRED: NO

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

He be credited with satisfactory service for retirement for the period after Operation IRAQI FREEDOM through 19 Dec 09.

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He should be credited time in service for his entire 6-year enlistment which would have ended on 31 Jan 09 as indicated on his Reserve Identification Card.

In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of his Uniform Services Identification Cards.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant’s military personnel records indicate that he served in the Air National Guard (ANG) in the grade of technical sergeant (E-6).

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military personnel records, are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) which is attached at Exhibit C.

________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

ARPC/DPP recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. The applicant enlisted in the ANG for 6 years on 1 Feb 03. On 15 Dec 03, he was released from active duty due to demobilization. He subsequently requested that he be transferred into the retired reserve with an effective date of 21 Dec 03. He was honorably discharged from the Missouri ANG, effective 19 Dec 03, and transferred to the USAFR, effective 20 Dec 03. He was assigned to the Retired Reserve on 21 Dec 03, in accordance with his request. However, he believes he should be credited with time in service for the entire 6-year enlistment which would have ended on 31 Jan 09. However, since he retired, effective 21 Dec 03, he cannot be given any further credit. His Retired Reserve Identification Card reflects the correct date based on his retirement.

A complete copy of the ARPC/DPP evaluation is at Exhibit C.

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

The applicant acknowledges that he was transferred to the retired reserve in 2003; however, as a member of the retired reserve, he continued to maintain a reserve status by enlistment through 19 Dec 09. In support of his response, the applicant provides an expanded statement (Exhibit E).

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of an error or injustice to warrant corrective action. The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been adequately rebutted by the applicant. Absent persuasive evidence the applicant was denied rights to which he was entitled, appropriate regulations were not followed, or appropriate standards were not applied, we find no basis to disturb the existing record.

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2010-03531 in Executive Session on 25 May 11, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

Ms. XXXXXXXXXX, Panel Chair

Mr. XXXXXXXXXX, Member

Mr. XXXXXXXXXX, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 12 Sep 10, w/atchs.

Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.

Exhibit C.  Letter, ARPC/DPP, dated 13 Jan 11, w/atchs.

Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 28 Jan 11.

Exhibit E.  Letter, Applicant, dated 1 Feb 11.

XXXXXXXXXX

Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-00897

    Original file (BC-2010-00897.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice to warrant correcting the applicant’s records to show that he was discharged from the Inactive Status List Reserve Section (ISLRS) on 9 Apr 01. The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2010-00897 in Executive Session on 11 Jan 11, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-00142

    Original file (BC-2009-00142.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    A review of the applicant’s records indicates he completed 23 years, 7 months, and 22 days of honorable service; however, only 19 years, 11 months, and 23 days was satisfactory service creditable toward retired pay eligibility. Honorable service is the total years of service in the military; it includes satisfactory service, as well as years the member did not participate sufficiently to earn satisfactory service. Additionally, it appears the ANG/USAFR Point Credit Summary provided by the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-02727

    Original file (BC-2010-02727.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    Her deceased husband’s records be corrected to reflect that she made timely notification of his death so she may receive benefits under the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP). The applicant states she was misinformed by the member’s ANG unit to wait until his 60th birthday (16 Jun 10) to file a claim for benefits. Exhibit B. Decedent’s Master Personnel Records.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-01957

    Original file (BC-2010-01957.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS However, in accordance with 10 USC 12683 and AFI 36-3209, Separation and Retirement Procedures for Air National Guard and Air Force Reserve Members , he should have been discharged from ISLRS after three years, effective 2 Oct 01. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice to warrant correcting the applicant’s records to show that he was discharged from the Inactive Status List...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-03744

    Original file (BC-2009-03744.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    As of this date, this office has received no response (Exhibit D). _______________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01372

    Original file (BC-2003-01372.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was told when he became an individual mobilization augmentee (IMA) that his retention/retirement (R/R) date was 5 Dec and that he needed to earn 50 points between 5 Dec and 4 Dec to have a “good year.” At some point his records were audited and his R/R date was changed to 30 Jan, but he was never notified of the change. This recommendation will provide the applicant a satisfactory year of service...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00705

    Original file (BC-2003-00705.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    For RYE 29 Dec 93, the applicant did not earn any points from Sep 93 through Dec 93, then after two consecutive satisfactory federal service years, the applicant received another unsatisfactory year, and did not earn points from Sep 96 through Dec 96. According to Air Force Manual 36-8001, para 2.2, “points may only be credited to the date a member actually performed the duty.” The applicant was credited with points and in the proper retirement years. Based on the evidence of record and...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-02458

    Original file (BC-2010-02458.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an injustice. In this respect, In view of the fact he had already applied for retirement with a 12 Jun 10 effective date, and having no reason to believe he would not have elected to take part in this important benefit in conjunction with his planned retirement, we elect to resolve any doubt in this matter in behalf of the applicant and recommend the decedent’s...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03576

    Original file (BC-2002-03576.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPP states that since the applicant never enlisted with the --- ANG or any other ANG unit she cannot be re-instated. DPPRSR states that the PALACE CHASE program requires the member to sign a contract in which the member agrees to serve two times whatever is currently owed to the Air Force in an Air Reserve Component unit. Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 11 Apr 03.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-02091

    Original file (BC-2010-02091.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    AFI 36-2504, paragraph 2.7 requires, among other things, that officers have an outstanding record with at least 50 points for a year of satisfactory service during the last full R/R year at the time of submission of the PRF to be considered by a PV promotion board. While the applicant met all the other requirements for consideration by the contested Board, he had not completed an R/R year as of either 18 Dec 09, or as of the date the Board convened on 1 Feb 10. Accordingly, we recommend...