Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-03411
Original file (BC-2010-03411.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2010-03411

            COUNSEL:  NONE

            HEARING DESIRED:  NO

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His reenlistment  (RE)  code  of  “2C”,  involuntarily  separated  with  an
honorable discharge, or entry-level separation without characterization  of
service be changed to allow him to reenter military service.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

The Air Force wrongfully diagnosed him with asthma.   He  does  not  now  or
ever have asthma.  He has provided documentation from his physician  stating
he does not have asthma.

In support of his request, the applicant provides  a  statement,  a  letter
from his civilian physician, and copies of  documents  extracted  from  his
military personnel records.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

On 1 Jul 08, the applicant contracted his enlistment  in  the  Regular  Air
Force.  He was progressively promoted to the grade of  airman  first  class
having assumed the grade effective and with a date of rank of 15 Aug 08.

On  5  Feb  09,  the  applicant’s  commander  notified  him  that  he   was
recommending his discharge from the Air  Force  for  Erroneous  Enlistment.
The specific  reason  for  the  discharge  action  was  the  applicant  was
diagnosed with a medical condition (asthma) which was  determined  to  have
existed prior to him entering military service.

His commander advised him of his rights in this matter.  On  21 Oct 08,  he
acknowledged receipt of the notification of discharge and waived his  right
to legal counsel and to submit a statement in his own behalf.

The legal office reviewed the case  and  found  it  legally  sufficient  to
support separation and recommended separation with an  honorable  discharge
without probation and rehabilitation (P&R).

On 12 Feb 09, the discharge authority directed discharge with an honorable,
without P&R.  He was discharged on 13 Feb 09.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AETC/SGPS recommends denial.  SGPS does not  support  a  change  in  the  RE
code.  They further  state  the  applicant’s  separation  was  processed  in
accordance with the established policy and administrative procedures.

The complete AETC/SGPS evaluation is at Exhibit C.

AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial of the request for a change  in  the  RE  code.
DPSOA states the RE code the applicant received is appropriate based on  him
being involuntarily  separated  with  an  honorable  discharge  and  is  not
affected by his current or previous medical status.

The complete AFPC/DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit D.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

Copies of the Air Force evaluation were forwarded to applicant on 4  Feb  11
for review and comment within 30 days.  As of this  date,  no  response  has
been received by this office (Exhibit E).

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided  by  existing  law  or
regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented  to  demonstrate  the
existence of an error or an injustice.  We took notice of  the  applicant's
complete submission in judging the merits of the case;  however,  we  agree
with the opinions and the recommendations  of  the  Air  Force  offices  of
primary responsibility and adopt their  rationale  as  the  basis  for  our
conclusion that the applicant has failed to sustain his burden of proof  of
the existence of either an error  or  injustice.   There  was  no  evidence
submitted or  located  in  the  applicant’s  military  records  showing  an
injustice or error occurred in the discharge process.  We further note that
no justification  was  provided  to  warrant  a  change  in  the  RE  code.
Therefore, in view of the above, we find no basis to recommend granting the
relief sought in this application.
_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented  did  not  demonstrate
the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the  application  was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only  be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant  evidence  not
considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2010-
03411 in Executive Session on 13 Apr 11, under the provisions  of  AFI  36-
2603:

      , Panel Chair
      , Member
      , Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 3 Sep 10, w/atchs.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, HQ AETC/SGPS, dated 22 Nov 10.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, HQ AFPC/DPSOA, dated 5 Jan 11.
    Exhibit E.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 4 Feb 11.





                                             Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-02525

    Original file (BC-2010-02525.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02525 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. On 20 Oct 08, the applicant’s commander notified him that he was recommending his discharge from the Air Force for Erroneous Enlistment. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-01636

    Original file (BC-2010-01636.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01636 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His narrative reason for separation “Fraudulent Entry into Military Service” and, his Reenlistment (RE) code “2C” (involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge, or entry level separation without characterization of service) be changed to allow...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00196

    Original file (BC-2011-00196.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Based on the documentation on file in the master personnel records, the discharge, to include the character of service, and assigned separation and RE codes, was appropriately administered and was within the discretion of the discharge authority. The applicant’s DD Form 214 will be administratively corrected to reflect the correct RE code 2C unless otherwise directed by the Board. The complete AFPC/DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04109

    Original file (BC-2012-04109.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04109 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) code of 4C (failure to meet physical standards for enlistment) be changed to a code that will allow him to reenlist in the military. ________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant’s...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01571

    Original file (BC-2011-01571.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01571 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment (RE) code of 4C (Separated for concealment of juvenile records, minority, failure to meet physical standards for enlistment, failure to attain a 9.0 reading grade level as measured by the Air Force Reading Abilities Test, or...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01441

    Original file (BC-2010-01441.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01441 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her uncharacterized entry level separation, separation code of “JFW” which denotes failed medical/physical procurement standards, and reentry (RE) code of 4C (separated for concealment of juvenile records, minority, failure to meet physical standards for...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02152

    Original file (BC-2010-02152.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02152 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 2C - Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service and separation code of JDA – Fraudulent Entry Into Military Service be changed in order to reenlist. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00532

    Original file (BC-2010-00532.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His military physician indicated if his condition resolved, he could reapply for enlistment. The complete AFPC/DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit D. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 10 Sep 10 for review and comment within 30 days. At the time members are separated from the Air Force, they are furnished an RE code predicated upon the quality of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03334

    Original file (BC-2011-03334.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 7 Apr 09, the applicant was furnished an entry level separation with uncharacterized service for erroneous enlistment, with an RE Code of 4C, and a narrative reason for separation of “Failed Medical/Physical Procurement Standards.” The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are attached at Exhibits C and...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01413

    Original file (BC 2013 01413.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01413 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of “2C” (Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or, entry-level separation without characterization of service) and narrative reason for separation (Erroneous Entry), be changed to allow him to reenter...