Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2003-01358
Original file (BC-2003-01358.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01358

XXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE

HEARING DESIRED: NO

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His records be corrected to reflect that he served in the Republic of Vietnam.

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He served in Vinh Long and Can Tho, Republic of Vietnam supporting US Army helicopter missions; however, his records do not reflect these assignments. He proved to the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) that he did serve in the Republic of Vietnam and has been granted a disability rating of 100 percent due to post traumatic stress disorder and agent orange exposure.

In support of his request, the applicant provides an expanded statement and copies of his DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, excerpts of his service medical records, correspondence from the DVA and Social Security Administration (SSA), and four supporting statements.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

_________________ ______________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant’s military personnel records indicate he enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 22 Oct 68 in the grade of airman basic (E-1) for a period of four years. He was progressively promoted to the grade of sergeant (E-4), effective and with a date of rank of 1 Nov 70. On 14 Aug 72, he was honorably discharged at the completion of his required active service and was credited with 3 years, 9 months, and 23 days of total active service.

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C.

________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPAPP2 recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. A thorough review of the applicant’s records reveals no official documents that support his claim that he served in the Republic of Vietnam.

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPAPP2 evaluation is at Exhibit C.

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 29 Aug 03 for review and comment within 30 days. In response, the applicant requested his case be administratively closed until such time as he could gather additional evidence (Exhibit E). His case was reopened by virtue of his latest submission, dated 29 Nov 09.

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application.

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2003-01358 in Executive Session on 1 Mar 11, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

Mr. XXXXXXXXXX, Panel Chair

Mr. XXXXXXXXXX, Member

Ms. XXXXXXXXXX, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A.  DD Forms 149, undated and 29 Nov 09, w/atchs.

Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.

Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPAPP2, dated 25 Aug 03.

Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 29 Aug 03.

Exhibit E.  Letter, Applicant, dated 5 Sep 03.

Exhibit F.  Letter, AFBCMR, dated 8 Oct 03.

XXXXXXXXXXX

Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-02189

    Original file (BC-2010-02189.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS Only members who meet the criteria for the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (Vietnam) or VSM during the period of service are considered to have contributed direct combat support to the RVN armed forces. Nonetheless, after careful review of the evidence of record and the applicant’s complete submission, we are convinced of his entitlement to the requested award.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01458

    Original file (BC-2003-01458.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01458 INDEX CODE: 113.00 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: Michael C. Stevenson XXXXXXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect service time in the Philippines and Vietnam and he be awarded the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM) or Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) and...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-02508

    Original file (BC-2010-02508.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS The Air Force Good Conduct Medal (AFGCM) is awarded to Air Force enlisted personnel during a three-year period of active military service. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice with respect to the applicant’s requests for the National Defense Service Medal (NDSM), Vietnam Unit Citation, Small Arms Expert Marksmanship Ribbon (SAEMR), Presidential Unit Citation (PUC), and...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-04076

    Original file (BC-2008-04076.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS The AFPC/DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit C. We note that AFPC has taken action to have the applicant’s DD Form 214 corrected to reflect award of AFOUA w/1 OLC, AFGCM, VSM, AFLSA, and the RVGC w/P; therefore, the only remaining issue before this Board is his request for entitlement to the RVCM.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02998

    Original file (BC-2002-02998.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    He be awarded the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). In support of his request, applicant provided a copy of his DD Form 214 and a copy of his service record. The DPPPR evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 22 Nov 02 and 7 Mar 03 for review and comment within 30 days.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02484

    Original file (BC-2002-02484.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The author recommends the applicant be credited with at least 30 days TDY to Tuy Hoa AB, Vietnam during 18 Mar 68 to 13 Apr 69. If it was stamped in Vietnam any time after 28 Mar 68, the applicant could not have been there for 30 days since his medical records show he was in a fistfight in Taiwan on 18 Apr 68 and was hospitalized until 24 Apr 68. While the possibility exists that the applicant may have been in Vietnam at some time, he has provided no evidence verifying that he was TDY...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-02217

    Original file (BC-2010-02217.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS On 6 Aug 70, the applicant was honorably discharged from the Air Force at the completion of his required active service. The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01349

    Original file (BC-2003-01349.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s military medical records show medical entries for low back pain and/or strain as early as 1960, 1961, 1963, and 1965, without evidence of trauma. In a 24 Jul 80 letter to a veteran’s hospital, a civilian physical reports that the applicant had acute back strain in Jan 60, low back pain after lifting a heavy object in Mar 61, back pain in May 63, back pain due to lifting sand bags in Vietnam in Apr 67, intermittent back pain in Aug 67, and low back pain in Dec 67. A DVA...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00722

    Original file (BC-2003-00722.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    His Air Force Form 7 does show he was TDY to Southeast Asia for a total of 97 days during 1969. Although the applicant provided no evidence to show actual locations while TDY to Southeast Asia (SEA), it was noted that his DD Form 214 reflects award of the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) and the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal (RVCM). The DVA denied his request because his military records reflect service in Southeast Asia (SEA), but not specifically in Vietnam.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02696

    Original file (BC-2003-02696.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    His records be corrected to reflect that during the period of June 1966 through August 1967 he traveled via classified military orders to Vietnam and the Philippines in direct support of the Vietnam War. His injury resulting from burning his left hand on a generator does not qualify for CRSC. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error...