Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2002-01814
Original file (BC-2002-01814.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-01814

            COUNSEL:  NONE
            HEARING DESIRED:  NO

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His dismissal be upgraded to  a  general  discharge  and  his  court-martial
conviction be overturned.

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

Adultry (sic) is only a military crime.  He  has  been  a  civilian  for  14
years and believes this conviction should not follow  and  hinder  him  from
moving forward.

In support of his request, applicant provides a copy of documents  extracted
from his military personnel records.

The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The relevant facts pertaining to  this  application  are  contained  in  the
letter prepared by the appropriate office of the  Air  Force.   Accordingly,
there is no need to recite these facts in this Record of Proceedings.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFLOA/JAJM reviewed this application and  recommends  denial.   JAJM  states
the application is untimely.  There  was  no  evidence  in  the  applicant’s
records or submitted showing an error or injustice in the processing of  his
court-martial or appeal.

The complete AFLOA/JAJM evaluation is at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

On 3 Dec 10, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded  to  applicant
for review and comment within 30 days.  To date, a  response  has  not  been
received (Exhibit E).

_________________________________________________________________

FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS OF THE BOARD:

We have carefully reviewed the applicant’s submission and  the  evidence  of
record and do not find a sufficient basis to excuse the untimely  filing  of
this application.  The applicant did not file within three years  after  the
alleged error or injustice was discovered as required by  Title  10,  United
States Code, Section 1552 and  Air  Force  Instruction  36-2603,  Air  Force
Board for Correction of Military Records.  The applicant  has  not  shown  a
plausible reason for the delay in filing, and we are not persuaded that  the
record raises issues of error or injustice which require resolution  on  the
merits.  Thus, we cannot conclude it would be in the interest of justice  to
excuse the untimely filing of this application.

________________________________________________________________

DECISION OF THE BOARD:

The application was not timely filed and it would not be in the interest  of
justice to waive the  untimeliness.   It  is  the  decision  of  the  Board,
therefore, to reject the application as untimely.

________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered  Docket  Number  BC-2002-01814
in Executive Session on 8 Feb 11, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

      , Panel Chair
      , Member
      , Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 20 Aug 10, w/atchs.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, AFLOA/JAJM, dated 13 Oct 10.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 3 Dec 10.





                                        Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-03842

    Original file (BC-2010-03842.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS Specifically, the 24 Oct 05 action provides: “the sentence is approved, and except for the Dishonorable Discharge, will be executed.” The language deferring execution of the DD is required by the UCMJ, which requires a final judgment as to the legality of the proceedings before a sentence to death, dismissal, DD, or BCD can be executed. The applicant’s request should be denied as untimely as the alleged injustice, i.e. defective action by...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2009-03787

    Original file (BC-2009-03787.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    A complete copy of the AFLOA/JAJM evaluation is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to applicant on 8 Dec 10 for review and comment, within 30 days. We have carefully reviewed the applicant’s submission and the evidence of record and do not fine a sufficient basis to excuse the untimely filing of this application. The applicant did not file within three...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 04313

    Original file (BC 2014 04313.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-04313 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Bad Conduct Discharge (BCD) be upgraded. Specifically, section 1552(f)(1) permits the correction of a record to reflect actions taken by a reviewing authority under the UCMJ. The complete JAJM evaluation is at Exhibit D. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00732

    Original file (BC-2012-00732.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant's military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit D. _______________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFLOA/JAJM recommends the Board deny the applicant’s request as untimely or on the merits. He also claims that the Numbered Air Force returned the Article 15 action because of the punishment's severity. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-01693

    Original file (BC-2007-01693.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-01693 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded to an under honorable conditions (general) discharge. Specifically, Section 1552 permits the correction of a record to reflect actions taken by reviewing authorities under the Uniform...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-04506

    Original file (BC-2010-04506.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS However, while convening authority subsequently approved the findings of guilty with regard to the violations of Article 134, the finding of guilty for the charge and second specification of the Article 113 violation was not approved and approved only so much of the sentence as provided for the BCD, six months of confinement, forfeiture of $249.00 pay per month for six months and a reduction to the grade of airman basic. There is no...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04694

    Original file (BC-2012-04694.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFLOA/JAJM recommends denying the applicant’s request due to untimeliness or on its merits, indicating the applicant has not supplied any evidence of injustice. The Air Force Court of Military Review approved and affirmed the findings...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01117

    Original file (BC-2006-01117.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-01117 INDEX CODE: 106 .00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 12 Oct 07 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His 2004 bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFLOA/JAJM recommends the application be...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04272

    Original file (BC-2010-04272.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-04272 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded to a general discharge. We also find no evidence which indicates the applicant’s service characterization, which had its basis in his conviction by general court-martial and was a part of the sentence of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03182

    Original file (BC 2014 03182.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03182 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Bad Conduct Discharge (BCD) be upgraded to honorable. In accordance with 10 USC 1552(f), the Board has no authority to overturn the court-martial conviction but may only on the basis of clemency, correct the actions taken by the reviewing authorities, i.e., the sentence. The complete AFLOA/JAJM evaluation is...