ADDENDUM TO
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2000-01878
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
IN THE MATTER OF:
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be
upgraded to honorable.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant was discharged with a UOTHC discharge, on
30 Jul 92, because of misconduct – pattern of discreditable
involvement with military or civilian authorities. His
discharge was based on numerous incidents of misconduct which
led to Letters of Reprimand (LORs) and Records of Counseling
(ROCs) for failure to go, disobeying a lawful order, dereliction
of duty, disrespect to a superior commissioned officer, and a
senior non-commissioned officer, and an Article 15 for driving
while intoxicated. At the time of his separation, he was
credited with 7 years, 7 months and 27 days of active duty
service.
A similar appeal was considered and denied by the Board on
16 November 2000. For an accounting of the facts and
circumstances surrounding the applicant’s separation, and, the
rationale of the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record
of Proceedings, with attachments, at Exhibit F.
The applicant requested reconsideration of his application, by
letter, dated 4 Apr 01; however, on 7 Aug 01, he was advised
that his request did not meet the criteria for reconsideration
by the Board.
The applicant requests his UOTHC discharge be upgraded. He
admits his wrongdoing; however, he believes that he has paid the
price and believes it is time for his discharge to be upgraded.
In support of his appeal, the applicant provides a personal
statement; extracts from his military record, and Department of
Veterans Affairs (DVA) and service medical record.
within
the
regulation
and
discharge
The applicant‘s complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit G.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
In an earlier finding, the Board determined there was
insufficient evidence to warrant an upgrade of the applicant’s
discharge. We reviewed the additional evidence in judging the
merits of the case; however, based on the available evidence of
record and that provided by the applicant, it appears the
discharge was consistent with the substantive requirements of
the
commander's
discretionary authority. Considering his overall record of
service and the lack of post service information since his
discharge, we are not persuaded that an upgrade of the
characterization of his discharge is warranted. We also find
insufficient evidence to warrant a recommendation that the
discharge be upgraded on the basis of clemency. Therefore, in
the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis upon
which to recommend granting the relief sought.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2000-01878 in Executive Session on 4 October 2011,
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Panel Chair
Exhibit F. Record of Proceedings, dated 20 Nov 00,
with Exhibits.
Exhibit G. DD Form 149, dated 25 Mar 11,
with attachments.
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY – PRIVACY ACT OF 1974
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2002-00082-2
ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-00082-2 COUNSEL: TX VETERANS COMMISSION HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: In the applicant’s request for reconsideration, he requests the reason for his separation (Triable by Court-Martial) and his reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of “2B” be changed; and, his under other than...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2002-00082-2
ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-00082-2 COUNSEL: TX VETERANS COMMISSION HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: In the applicant’s request for reconsideration, he requests the reason for his separation (Triable by Court-Martial) and his reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of “2B” be changed; and, his under other than...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2002-04027-2
________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 15 May 2008, the Board considered and denied a similar appeal. His complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit F. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: In earlier findings, we determined that there was insufficient evidence to warrant an upgrade of the applicant’s discharge. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-00061A
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 15 July 2009, the applicant's request that his UOTHC discharge be upgraded to honorable was considered and denied by the Board. For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicants request, and, the rationale of the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings at Exhibit F. On 12 August 2009, the applicant submitted a request for reconsideration. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-1996-03327A
For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicant's request to have his discharge upgraded, and the rationale of the earlier decisions by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings, with attachments, at Exhibit C. The applicant submitted an undated DD Form 149 with attachments requesting reconsideration of his request to have his discharge upgraded (Exhibit D). _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board...
AF | BCMR | CY2001 | BC 2001 02811
STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 6 March 2002, the Board considered and denied the applicants request that his discharge be upgraded to general (under honorable conditions). For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicants separation and the rationale of the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings, with attachments, at Exhibit F. In an application dated 20 June 2014, the applicant seeks reconsideration of his earlier request. THE BOARD DETERMINES...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2000-00961-2
A summary of the evidence considered and the rationale of the earlier decision by the Board is set forth in the Record of Proceedings at Exhibit F. On 10 January 2002, in response to a congressional inquiry, in behalf of the applicant, the AFBCMR denied the applicant’s request for reconsideration of her application (Refer to Exhibit G). To support this assertion, the applicant provided a personal statement, a statement from a Forensic Investigator who opines that the signature on the letter...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-1983-01854A
Exhibit F. Letter, AFMPC/DPMARS2, dated 0 May 86. Exhibit J. Exhibit O.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 02158 2
STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 6 December 2012, the Board considered and denied the applicants request that his UOTHC discharge be upgraded. For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicants separation and the rationale of the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings, with attachments, at Exhibit E. In an application dated 11 February 2014, the applicant seeks reconsideration of his earlier request. Therefore, we do not find the additional...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC -1991-01786-2
A copy of the Record of Proceedings is at Exhibit F. On 1 July 2000, applicant submitted an application requesting reconsideration that his discharge be upgraded. A copy of the AFBCMR letter, with attachments, is at Exhibit G. On 26 May 2004, applicant submitted an application requesting reconsideration that his discharge be upgraded at least to a general. JOE G. LINEBERGER Director Air Force Review Boards Agency AFBCMR BC-1991-01786-2 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, AIR FORCE BOARD...