DOCKET NUMBER: BC-1989-00782
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
ADDENDUM TO
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF:
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His undesirable discharge be upgraded to a general (under
honorable conditions) discharge or an honorable discharge.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 31 May 85, the Board considered and denied an application
pertaining to the applicant, in which he requested his discharge
be changed to a general (under honorable conditions) discharge or
an honorable discharge. For an accounting of the facts and
circumstances surrounding the applicant’s request, and the
rationale of the earlier decision of the Board, see the Record of
Proceedings, with attachments, at Exhibit F.
By application, dated 7 Oct 10, the applicant requests
reconsideration of his request, contending his discharge was
inequitable because it was based on one incident and the fact
that it was 47 years ago.
In support of the appeal, the applicant submits an expanded
statement, an application for disability insurance benefits,
Social Security Administration correspondence, and extracts from
his master personnel records.
The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit G.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
We have thoroughly reviewed the evidence of record and considered
the weight and relevance of the additional documentation provided
by the applicant, and whether or not it was discoverable at the
time of any previous application. Additionally, we have
considered the applicant's overall quality of service, the events
which precipitated his discharge and the available evidence
related to post-service activities and accomplishments. However,
based on the evidence of record, the Board majority concludes
that clemency is not warranted and notes the applicant has not
provided sufficient information of post-service activities and
accomplishments. Should the applicant provide statements from
community leaders and acquaintances attesting to his good
character and reputation and other evidence of successful post-
service rehabilitation, this Board will reconsider this case
based on the new evidence. Therefore, in view of the above and
in the absence of relevant evidence, the Board majority finds no
basis to reconsider the applicant’s request.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the additional evidence presented
did not meet the criteria for reconsideration by the Board; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered
with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered the applicant’s
request for reconsideration of AFBCMR Docket Number 1989-00782 in
Executive Session on 9 March 2011, under the provisions of AFI
36-2603:
By majority vote, the Board voted to deny the application. XXXX
voted to grant the request but does not desire to submit a
Minority Report. The following documentary evidence was
considered:
Panel Chair
Exhibit F. Record of Proceedings, dated 14 Aug 89, w/atchs.
Exhibit G. DD Form 149, dated 7 Oct 10, w/atchs.
Panel Chair
Member
Member
2
By letter, dated 7 July 1997, applicant requested reconsideration of the Board’s decision and provided additional documentation in the form of a 5 May 1977 letter, subject: Basis of Board Selections, and a document entitled “Evidentiary Support: Illegal Selection Boards.” (Exhibit H) ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The Special Selections Boards (SSBs) and central selection boards which considered his file were conducted contrary to...
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1988-00782
By letter, dated 7 July 1997, applicant requested reconsideration of the Board’s decision and provided additional documentation in the form of a 5 May 1977 letter, subject: Basis of Board Selections, and a document entitled “Evidentiary Support: Illegal Selection Boards.” (Exhibit H) ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The Special Selections Boards (SSBs) and central selection boards which considered his file were conducted contrary to...
It appears that the responsible officials applied appropriate standards in effecting the separation, and we do not find persuasive evidence that pertinent regulations were violated or that applicant was not afforded all the rights to which entitled at the time of discharge. Under our broader mandate and after careful consideration of all the facts and circumstances of applicant's case, the majority of the Board is persuaded the applicant has been a productive member of society. Applicant's...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00782 INDEX CODE 112.07 128.05 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reenlistment on 9 November 2001 be voided and a constructive reenlistment request of 20 January 2002 be granted to qualify for a higher Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-1989-01497A
In a letter, dated 23 December 2002, the applicant was advised that inasmuch as his request contained essentially the same request that was previously considered and denied by the Board and he had provided no new relevant evidence, it did not meet the criteria for reconsideration by the Board (Exhibit H). After a thorough review of the evidence of record and the additional documentation submitted by the applicant, we are not persuaded that a change to his characterization of service...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02058-2
His record, to include a letter from the Commander, Air Force Personnel Center (AFPC/CC) to the President of the Special Selection Boards (SSBs) stating that, “All assignment, OER, OPR, PRF, PME and award documentations for the period “AFTER” Sep 1987 to 28 Feb 1998 are NOT available for administrative reasons which were the fault of the Air Force and not the member.”, be considered for promotion to the grade of brigadier general (O-7) by SSBs for the Calendar Years 1991 through 1997 boards...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02402 ADDENDUM
His records since his discharge are clean. The applicants complete response, with attachments, is at Exhibit H. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: We have thoroughly reviewed the evidence of record and considered the weight and relevance of the additional documentation provided by the applicant, and whether or not it was discoverable at the time of any previous application. Exhibit H. Letter, Applicant, 24 Sep 10, w/atchs.
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC 2010 02989
On behalf of the applicant, an accredited veterans administration claims agent/veterans advocate, indicated subsequent to the Boards original decision, he was diagnosed with an aggravated chronic mental health condition and was awarded a combined compensable disability rating of 50 percent (Major Depressive Disorder) by the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA). In this respect, we note that while the two supporting statements indicate the applicant suffers from major depressive disorder...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-1991-02414A
For a further accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the application, and the rationale of the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings at Exhibit G. In a letter, dated 1 August 1995, the applicant requested reconsideration of his application and provided additional documentation (Exhibit H); however, in a letter dated 8 October 1997, he was advised that his request did not meet the criteria for reconsideration by the Board (Exhibit I). In letters, dated...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2001-01442A
On 5 Sep 02, the applicant submitted a copy of a DD Form 293, dated 17 May 01, with the same request as above (Exhibit G). The applicant submitted a new DD Form 149 on 26 Oct 02 requesting that he be allowed to reenlist in the Air Force (Exhibit I). Exhibit J.