RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-04723
COUNSEL: NO
HEARING DESIRED: NO
__________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His records be considered by Special Selection Board (SSB) for the
Calendar Year 2009B (CY09B) Lieutenant Colonel (Lt Col) Central
Selection Board (CSB) with a substituted Promotion Recommendation
Form (PRF).
__________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
His In-the-Promotion-Zone (IPZ) PRF for the CY09B CSB contained
errors and did not match his career accomplishments. There were
critical career accomplishments that were omitted and the errors
remained despite his efforts to resolve the problem prior to the
CSB convening.
In support of his appeal, the applicant provides a personal
statement, PRFs, electronic communications, non-selection
notification, Officer Selection Brief, Awards and Decoration
Information, Officer Performance Reports (OPRs), and
Education/Training Reports.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
__________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant is currently serving in the Regular Air Force in the
grade of major (O-4) with a Total Active Federal Military Service
Date and Total Active Federal Commissioned Service Date of 15 July
1995.
He has two non-selections to the grade of Lt Col by the CY09B and
CY10A Lt Col CSBs.
The remaining relevant facts extracted from the applicant service
records are contained in the evaluations by the Air Force offices
of primary responsibility at Exhibit B and C.
__________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the applicants request to
substitute his CY09B PRF. DPSID states that the applicants
request to substitute his PRF lacks support from his Senior Rater;
therefore, there is no signature on the substituted PRF provided.
A report is not erroneous or unfair because the applicant believes
it contributed to a non-selection for promotion or may impact
future promotion or career opportunities. The applicant reviewed
his PRF in accordance with (IAW) Air Force Instruction (AFI) 36-
2406, paragraph 8.1.4.1.7., and pointed out the errors on the PRF
prior to the CSB. The Senior Rater made two corrections to the
PRF and submitted the new PRF to the applicant IAW paragraph 8.5.
While the applicant believes that this is an injustice, IAW AFI
36-2401, paragraph A1.6.2.2., the Senior Rater bears the
responsibility of selecting what to include in the PRF, and what
to leave out; which portions of the officers career to
concentrate on, and which portions to have supported by the
record. While the PRF may not be worded the way the applicant
would like to describe his accomplishments, the selection board
had his entire Officer Selection Record (OSR) that clearly
outlined his accomplishments since the day he came on active duty.
IAW AFI 36-2401, paragraph A1.6, to have the PRF corrected in
Section IV (Promotion Recommendation), it requires the concurrence
of both the Senior Rater and the Management Level Review (MLR)
President. By the applicants own words, the Senior Rater
considered the applicants request and made adjustments to the PRF
accordingly. To grant the applicants request would be to discard
the Senior Raters input and authority. The applicant has failed
to provide support from the Senior Rater or MLR President.
The complete DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit C.
AFPC/DPSOO recommends denial of the applicants request for
consideration by an SSB. DPSOO states that their evaluation
requires them to rely on the opinions of other Air Force experts.
As such, they have reviewed the evaluation from DPSID and based on
their recommendation to deny the applicants request to substitute
the CY09B PRF, they recommend the Board deny his request for SSB
consideration.
The complete DPSOO evaluation is at Exhibit C.
__________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the
applicant on 1 April 2011 for review and comment within 30 days
(Exhibit D). As of this date, this office has received no
response.
__________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of
the case; however, we agree with the opinions and recommendations
of the Air Force offices of primary responsibility and adopt their
rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has
not been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend
granting the relief sought in this application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number
BC-2010-04723 in Executive Session on 8 September 2011, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Vice Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered in connection
with AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2010-04723:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 3 Dec 10, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPSID, dated 21 Feb 11.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSOO, dated 4 Mar 11.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 1 Apr 11.
Vice Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00807
2 The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force, which are attached at Exhibits C through E. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPF recommends an SSB be convened and the applicant’s record be competed for an in-residence seat against officers actually selected for ISS during his eligibility window. The complete DPSID evaluation is at...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00875
Based on the above changes to his record, the Board recommended his corrected record he be considered for promotion to the grade of Lt Col by SSB for CY10A and CY11A _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the applicants request to void his current PRF and replace it with a PRF generated by his current Senior Rater within his current command. The PRF portrays the leadership potential for promotion to the grade...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03469
The applicant fails to recognize that the PRF is not the only record which documents performance within the Officer Selection Record (OSR) at the time of CSB promotion consideration. The complete DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit B. AFPC/DPSOO recommends denying the applicants request for direct promotion to the grade of Lt Col; however, they support Special Selection Board (SSB) consideration in order for the applicant to write a letter to the CY2011A Lt Col CSB highlighting...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05186
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05186 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her AF Form 707, Officer Performance Report (OPR) (Lt thru Col), rendered for the period 16 September 2012 through 26 June 2013, be filed in her Officer Selection Record (OSR). APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Her final OPR from the Joint Staff, corrected DMSM, or the correct version of her PRF were not timely submitted to...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02037
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force, which are attached at Exhibits B through D. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the applicant’s request to substitute the contested PRF. Based upon the presumed sufficiency of the prior ERAB decision, and no valid evidence provided by the applicant of any error or...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00323
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOO evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the applicants request to remove his N-O PRF for the PO513A CSB and replace it with an updated version, indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. Once a file is accepted for record, only strong evidence to the contrary warrants correction or removal from the record. While the Board notes the applicants letter of support from the ACC/CC, we believe it would be inappropriate for...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00740
The complete DPALL evaluations, dated 15 May 2013 and 27 March 2013, are at Exhibits C and D. AFPC/DPSID defers to the Air Force Decoration Board on whether the applicants actions merit award of the MSM, 2 OLC. f. Providing his corrected record, to include the PRF reflecting an overall promotion recommendation of DP, promotion consideration by an SSB for the CY10A Lt Col CSB. d. He be awarded the MSM, 2 OLC, for meritorious service during the period from 25 November 2008 to 30 November...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04690
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-04690 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. vxHis Promotion Recommendation Form (PRF) rendered on him for the Calendar Year 2010B (CY10B) Major Central Selection Board (CSB) be rewritten by his new wing chaplain. He be considered for promotion to the grade of major by a Special Selection...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01396
1 The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force, which are attached at Exhibits B thru C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the applicant’s request to substitute his contested PRF with the revised PRF. The complete DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit B. AFPC/DPSOO recommends denial of the applicant’s request for...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04446
The board convened on 8 March 2010 and the report was not finalized until 10 April 2010, after the board adjourned. DPSOO states the absence of the 11 February 2010 OPR does not constitute an error since the report was not required to be filed in the applicants record until 60 days after the close out date, or 13 April 2010. The complete DPSOO evaluation is at Exhibit D. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of...