RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-03002
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
Her Intermediate Developmental Education (IDE) credit be changed
from non-residence to residence.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
She was selected to attend IDE in residence, part time. The
invitation to attend the school stated that in order to receive
in-residence credit she must complete a 2-year program at the
Defence Intelligence Agency (DIA) and complete Air Command and
Staff College in correspondence was required. She completed
the Air Command & Staff College (ACSC) on 1 Dec 05.
Additionally, she attended the National Defense Intelligence
College (NDIC) earning a Masters in Strategic Intelligence on
24 Jul 09. When she asked the Air Reserve Personnel Center
(ARPC) about the in-residence credit, they had no recollection
that she would receive in-residence credit for this program due
to it conflicting with their policy. ARPC could not find the
original documentation regarding this issue. It was then
elevated to AF/REP for adjudication. The following was provided
by AF/REP:
Air University will only accept the graduate roster from NDIC
or a copy of the 475 training report as an official document to
award in-residence credit; those documents are not prepared for
blended/part-time courses. To date, A1D has not supported in-
residence credit for any distance learning or even blended
opportunities
In support of her request, the applicant provides a copy of her
In-Residence IDE package and a copy of her NDIC transcript.
Her complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant is currently serving on active duty in the Air
Force Reserve in the grade of lieutenant colonel (0-5). She
attended the IDE at the NDIC part-time. The applicant was
awarded her Master of Science of Strategic Intelligence degree on
29 Jul 09.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFRC/A1K recommends denial. A1K consulted with AF/REPP and
states that in order to award in-residence IDE credit, the
applicant must provide the following:
a. AF Form 475, Training Report.
b. Graduate Roster from NDIC.
Without the supporting documents, the Air Force Reserve Command
cannot support granting in-resident credit.
The AFRC/A1K complete evaluation is at Exhibit B.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The applicant responded by providing a supporting document that
verifies her enrollment to the NDIC that is signed by the
Registration Team Lead. She provides the enrollment verification
memorandum in place of the AF Form 475, because the form is not
accomplished for in-residence part-time students.
The applicants complete submission, with attachment, is at
Exhibit D.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. While we note
the applicants contention that the notification and
congratulatory letters that selected her for IDE in-residence,
part-time, appear to suggest she would receive in-residence
credit, it does not negate the fact that the school has never
awarded part-time students attending the IDE course with full-time
in-residence credit. We also note the applicant sought
confirmation from the Air Reserve Personnel Center (ARPC);
however, they had no recollection or any supporting documentation
of ever awarding in-residence credit for part-time students and
stated it conflicted with their policy. Therefore, the Board
majority agrees with the opinion and recommendation of the Air
Force office of primary responsibility and adopts its rationale as
the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the
victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the absence of
evidence to the contrary, the Board majority finds no basis to
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
A majority of the panel finds insufficient evidence of error or
injustice and recommends the application be denied.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number
BC-2010-03002 in Executive Session on 15 Mar 11, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Panel Chair
Member
Member
By a majority vote, the members voted to deny the request.
XXX voted to correct the record and submitted a minority
report which is at Exhibit E. The following documentary evidence
was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 10 Aug 10, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Letter, AFRC/A1K, dated 29 Nov 10.
Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 7 Jan 11.
Exhibit D. Letter, Applicant, dated 14 Jan 11, w/atch.
Exhibit E. Minority Report, dated 18 Mar 11.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02444
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR) which are included at Exhibits C, D, and E. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOR recommends the applicants record be corrected to reflect he requested and received a reserve commission and transferred to the IRR when he separated from active duty. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOR evaluation is at Exhibit C. ARPC/DPA recommends approval,...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-00925
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-00925 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. When she inquired about her pay date, she was told it would be the date (19 Apr 00) she joined the Air Force. ______________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01466
________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFRC/A1K recommends denial, stating, in part, that the applicant's case file reflects that she was denied a participation waiver by the AFRC/SG staff for the period of time in question. While the form is not signed, the Air Force Reserve Surgeon General (AFRC/SG) notes that the applicant was submitted for a participation waiver; however, her request was denied. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02914
The applicant has not provided any supporting documentation (i.e. signed promotion roster by the promotion authority or promotion orders) to sustain he should have been promoted to the grade of CMSgt or that he was ever selected for promotion by the promotion authority. The complete A1K evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The first paragraph of the advisory opinion states that he claims he...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00072
Regarding the applicants request that she be given a 20 year active duty retirement with full retirement benefits, A1K states that her medical case which included the applicable documentation that ultimately led to a finding of ILOD was appropriately reviewed and a determination was made on that case by the PEB. The complete A1K evaluation is at Exhibit D. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant certainly...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00516
He further states that he believes the applicant completed all requirements for IDE equivalency credit and recommends the Board evaluate her records. According to the applicants Voluntary Separation Application time stamped 9 April 2009, her request for a separation date of 1 January 2010, was approved. The DPAPP letter dated 16 April 2014, stated Even if you had been recommended for equivalency credit by your Developmental Team and given conditional approval by the DEDB and AF/Al, you...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04469
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04469 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be paid $20,000.00 bonus over the course of 3 years as stated in his agreement. At the time of his enlistment, the applicant was eligible for the $7,500.00 bonus for his 3 year enlistment. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02444
A complete copy of the AFRC/SGP evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFRC/A1K recommends denial, indicating the applicant has not provided any supporting documentation that substantiates that a DD Form 214 should have been issued for the period of service in question (i.e., active duty orders reflecting that she completed 90 continuous days or more of active duty, or reflecting that she has been involuntarily mobilized during the event of a national emergency or war under 10 USC 12301, 12302, 12304,...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02352
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-02352 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She receive pay and points for the period Dec 10 through Nov 12. Her medical facility failed to provide the proper documentation to the Air Force Reserve Command (AFRC) medical board, causing her referral to a Formal Physical Evaluation Board (FPEB)....
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00566
His date of rank (DOR) and effective date of promotion is 1 December 2011. Upon completing the Article 15 punishment action, the applicant became eligible for promotion the following day to the rank of Airman, (E-2). Based on documentation, (AF Form 3070A), provided, the request to adjust the applicant’s promotion eligibility date (PED) and Date of Rank (DOR) meets the basic requirements for correction of his promotion history to 23 June 2011 versus 1 July 2011, his requested date.