RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02265
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
________________________________________________________________
THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His record be corrected to reflect continuous active duty orders
from 15 April 2008 through 31 July 2009, including travel pay;
or, in the alternative, he be granted incapacitation pay for
that period.
In his response to the Air Force Reserve Command evaluation, the
applicant amended his request to state that his record reflect
that he was on continuous active duty from 15 April 2009 through
31 July 2009.
________________________________________________________________
THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He should have received medical continuation orders following
his hernia surgery for the period 14 April 2008 through
31 July 2009. In January 2009 (sic), his hernia was repaired,
but the surgery was unsuccessful.
He should have received travel pay to and from his appointments
and, if not on active duty orders, he should have received
incapacitation pay for the periods he was not on orders.
He was on active duty orders from 6 October 10 October 2008
and on the last day of active duty he reaggravated an old hernia
injury dating back to 2003. His orders were amended to include
the period from 14 15 October 2008 and he was sent to the
doctor to be evaluated. His orders were extended from
11 October 10 November 2008 with subsequent amendments
numerous times. He was without orders for two-weeks at a time
and had trouble meeting his financial obligations and getting
health care. However, his orders were revoked and he was forced
back into civilian status, while still under the doctors care.
After weeks of waiting and numerous doctor visits, he had to
undergo another surgery on 26 May 2009. His commander placed
him on active duty orders from 26 May 2009 through 26 June 2009;
however, these orders were amended (sic) and he was released on
9 June 2009, after the convalescent period was over. He was
finally released from his hernia surgery per the assessment
plan, dated 10 June 2009.
In support of his appeal, the applicant provides a personal
statement; a copy of his Air Force Reserve retirement order,
Reserve Order (RO) EK-0395, dated 23 October 2009; numerous
active duty orders and amendments, and Civilian and Military
Leave and Earnings Statements (C/MLESs).
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Based on the applicants submission and the available records,
the applicant was on active duty 6 Oct 08 through 14 Apr 09.
The applicant was again placed on active duty from 26 May
through 9 Jun 09, when he was medically released.
________________________________________________________________
THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFRC/SGP recommends denial, stating, in part, the period for
which the applicant is requesting pay begins prior to the
injury/re-injury of the hernia. The applicant was on a four day
annual tour order when he reported his hernia injury. A Line of
Duty (LOD) was not initiated until February 2009 and was not
completed until July 2009, with a finding of Existed Prior to
ServiceService Aggravated (EPTS-SA), a finding that established
a positive service connection.
In accordance with Department of Defense Instruction (DoDI)
1241.2, Reserve Incapacitation System Management, Reserve
members in status 30 days or less who aggravate an injury may be
continued on active duty for treatment or recovery, though it is
not mandatory. Due to the fact that the applicant was in a unit
funded duty status when the condition was aggravated, the
authority to issue further orders rested with the unit
commander.
SGP found no evidence of a service connected medical condition
that would require pay and allowance benefits during the period
from 15 April 2008 through 9 October 2008. SGP indicates the
applicant has two service connected conditions, neither of which
were disqualifying for continued military service, or would
require a review under the Military Disability Evaluation System
(MDES). In addition, his last condition that potentially
required a Medical Evaluation Board review was found to be non
service connected.
The complete AFRC/SGP evaluation is at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The applicant notes that he submitted the wrong period in his
request, he actually was requesting active duty from 15 Apr -
31 Jul 09. He was not released from his doctors care until
31 Jul 09 and should have been kept on active duty orders until
he was found fit for duty. He had a profile serial code of P-
4 during the whole period following the reaggravation of his
hernia injury.
He asserts that his hearing loss and sleep apnea are
disqualifying in accordance with (IAW) the governing directives
and does not believe his conditions were properly evaluated. In
addition, he believes that his condition, hypertension, was not
properly evaluated as well.
In support of his appeal, the applicant provides a copy of his
DD Form 214, Certificate of Discharge or Release from Active
duty, dated 14 Apr 09 and other supporting documents.
The applicants complete response, with attachments, is at
Exhibit E.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of
the case; however, we note, the applicant was on an active duty
tour of less than 30 days when his condition was reaggravated.
Therefore, we do not find that his conditions were improperly
evaluated or that he was not given due process IAW the governing
directives. In this respect, noting the comments from AFRC/SG,
Reserve members in status 30 days or less MAY be continued on
active duty, although it is not mandatory. Regarding the
applicants assertion that his hearing loss, sleep apnea and
hypertension were not properly evaluated, after a review of the
evidence of record and the applicants submission, other than
his own statements, he has not provided sufficient evidence that
he was not properly evaluated. In addition, the applicant
believes that he should have remained on active duty
continuously from 6 October 2008 until 31 July 2009, when he
maintains that his medical conditions were stabilized or
resolved; however, based on the available evidence presented to
this Board, in our view, he has failed to sustain his burden of
proof of having suffered either an error or injustice or that the
active duty periods were insufficient based on the severity of
the conditions and the treatment he received. Therefore, in the
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2010-02265 in Executive Session on 24 March 2011,
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 16 Jun 10, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFRC/SGP, dated 28 Dec 10.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 18 Feb 11.
Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, dated 14 Mar 11, w/atchs.
Acting Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00333
Later, he received a shot of cortisone to help manage the pain and was told that he may need surgery to correct his problem; the surgery was not one that could be performed in theater. Therefore, we recommend that the records be corrected as indicated below. Exhibit D. Letter, Applicant, dated 23 Mar 10.
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00488
In accordance with paragraph 6.6.3.2 of DoD Instruction 1241.2, Reserve Component Incapacitation System Management, a Reserve component member on active duty under a call or order to active duty of 31 or more days who incurs or aggravates an injury, illness, or disease in the line of duty shall, with the member's consent, be continued on active duty until the member is determined to be fit for duty or separated or retired as a result of a Disability Evaluation System (DES) determination. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01668
The applicant was serving on active duty orders for more than 30 days, and the Air Force was required by law to continue him on active duty orders. The applicant served on active duty continuously from 2004 until 9 Oct 09, the date of his removal from active duty. The Counsel's complete response is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant recommends granting the applicant relief by changing...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-00701
As a result of the investigation, the recommended finding was "In Line of Duty." As a result of the investigation, the recommended finding was "In Line of Duty." The applicant's contentions are duly noted; however, insufficient evidence has been provided showing that at the time of his separation, he suffered from a medical condition that should have been evaluated in the disability evaluation system.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-02947
On 13 May 09, the applicant was released from active duty at the expiration of her active duty orders. The applicant was granted a waiver to perform military duty at home station and, on 26 May 09, she was ordered to active duty voluntarily and served until 30 Sep 09 at the expiration of her active duty orders. On 8 Feb 10, the applicant was ordered to active duty voluntarily and was released from active duty on 30 Sep 10 at the expiration of her active duty orders.
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-00282
SGP finds that during the period following release from active duty orders in October 2006 until completion of DES processing in January 2008, he would have been a candidate for the participation waiver and therefore not eligible for medical continuation orders. It is upon this recommendation that his military record be corrected to reflect service points for the time he was denied participation, 3 October 2006 through 27 February 2008. The complete A1B evaluation, with attachments, is at...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01051
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01051 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be paid Incapacitation Pay, in behalf of her late husband, for the period 1 October 2009 through 13 January 2010. We note the Air Force offices of primary responsibility recommend granting the decedents widow incapacitation pay for the requested...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02344
Examiners note: According to the governing SAF/AA policy letter dated 8 December 2006, (Exhibit B) entitlement to medical continuation orders begins when the condition renders the member unable to perform military duty not when the injury occurred or when the airman was released from active duty. The applicant was not continued on active duty or placed on medical continuation orders until 16 June 2011 after completion of the LOD determination. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04815
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: While he was on orders for 167 days, he was diagnosed with a hernia in Feb 2011 and surgery was recommended. Although he received INCAP pay from 1 Apr 2012, he is entitled to a point for each day that he should have been continued on military orders. Exhibit C. Letter, BCMR Medical Consultant, dated 11 Jul 2012.
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02151
The complete BCMR Medical Consultant evaluation is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicants counsel responded that the BCMR Medical Consultant states the applicant is requesting a change to his discharge to Honorable, Medical. It was a year and almost four months from the time of his surgery to his enlistment and the new injury. The applicants counsel asserts the applicants knee...