RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02114
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His uncharacterized entry level separation be upgraded.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
His time in the military helped him to shape his core values and
develop discipline, which has made him successful as a
professional in the field of finance.
The applicant's complete submission is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 17 Dec 92, the applicant entered the Regular Air Force.
On 7 Jun 93, the applicant was notified of pending discharge
action. Specifically, the commander cited minor disciplinary
infractions as the basis for discharge.
The applicants misconduct included an Unfavorable Information
File, two Letters of Reprimand, four Letters of Counseling for
offenses of failing to update his locator card in a timely
manner, and failing to report to the military training monitor
within 72 hours as required; violating Phase I requirements by
wearing civilian clothes outside his bay area and not being in
the dormitory during curfew hours; failing to appear for Air
Force Instruction details; failing to appear for door guard
duty, and taking a break inside when the temperature exceeded
50 degrees.
The applicant waived his rights to consult counsel and to submit
statements in his own behalf.
On 8 Jun 93, the commander directed discharge. On 9 Jun 93, the
applicant was discharged with an uncharacterized entry level
separation. He was credited with 5 months and 24 days of active
service.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ AFPC/DPSOS recommends denial. DPSOS states that based on the
documentation on file in the master personnel records, the
discharge, to include the service characterization, was
appropriately administered and within the discretion of the
discharge authority. Further, the applicant did not provide any
evidence that an error or injustice occurred in the processing
of his discharge warranting a change to his character of
service.
The complete HQ AFPC/DPSOS evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy Of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant on 19 Nov 10 for review and comment within 30 days
(Exhibit C). As of this date, this office has not received a
response.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its
rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not
been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered
with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number
BC-2010-02114 in Executive Session on 15 February 2011, under
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 28 May 10.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPSOS, dated 10 Nov 10.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 19 Nov 10.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02716
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR) which are attached at Exhibits C and D. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOS recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. The applicant did not provide any evidence that an error or injustice that occurred in the processing of his discharge...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03316
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005- 03316 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 01 MAY 2007 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His uncharacterized entry level separation be changed to an honorable discharge. The discharge was within the discretion of the discharge authority. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-02525
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02525 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. On 20 Oct 08, the applicant’s commander notified him that he was recommending his discharge from the Air Force for Erroneous Enlistment. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03010
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03010 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her narrative reason for separation be changed from Miscellaneous/General Reasons to For the Convenience of the Government. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: An injury she received in Jun 93...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-01945
In support of his request, the applicant provided a copy of his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, DD Form 293, Application for the Review of Discharge from the Armed Force of the United States, documents extracted from his military personnel records and an extract from Army Regulation (AR) 601-210. On 9 Dec 02, his commander notified him that he was recommending his discharge from the Air Force for fraudulent entry. AFPC/DPSOA's complete evaluation is...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC 2010 02763
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02763 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His uncharacterized service be changed to honorable. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOS recommends denial, stating, in part, based on the documentation in the master personnel records, the...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01042
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01042 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty be corrected as follows: 1. The applicant did not provide any evidence of an error or injustice that occurred in the processing of his discharge warranting a change to his...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00703
As a result, on 6 Sep 01, she was convicted by court martial for wrongful use of marijuana and wrongful introduction of marijuana onto base with the intent to distribute. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibits C and D. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSOS recommends...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-01636
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01636 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His narrative reason for separation “Fraudulent Entry into Military Service” and, his Reenlistment (RE) code “2C” (involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge, or entry level separation without characterization of service) be changed to allow...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02825
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02825 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her uncharacterized entry level separation be changed to honorable. DPSOS states that based on the documentation on file in the master personnel records, the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge...