Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01844
Original file (BC-2010-01844.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01844 

COUNSEL: NO 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His DD Form 214, Report of Separation from Active Duty, be 
corrected to reflect his overseas service. 

 

Examiner’s Note: Per a telephone communication on 23 June 2010, 
between the applicant and the Air Force office of primary 
responsibility (OPR), the applicant specifically requests his 
service in Greenland and Vietnam be corrected in his record. He 
asserts he was stationed in Vietnam; however, he does not 
remember the dates. The AFBCMR staff verified with the OPR that 
the applicant’s record will be corrected to reflect the 
applicant’s service in Greenland, after Board consideration on 
his request for Vietnam service. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

He would like to join the Veterans of Foreign Wars (VFW); 
however, his DD Form 214 does not show his overseas service. 

 

In support of his appeal, the applicant provides copies of his DD 
Form 214 and two Temporary Duty (TDY) orders. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant is a former member of the Regular Air Force who 
served on active duty from 4 January 1971 through 12 December 
1974. He was progressively promoted to the grade of sergeant (E-
4) with a date of rank of 1 October 1972. The applicant served 
3 years, 11 months, and 9 days on active duty. His DD Form 214 
does not reflect any foreign service. 

 

On 3 September 2010, AFPC/DPAPP notified the applicant that they 
were able to verify his service at Thule Air Base, Greenland, 
from 1 August 1972 to 31 July 1973 and will correct his record 


once the Board has made their final determination on his request. 
However, they were unable to locate any official documentation to 
verify his service in Vietnam. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial of the applicant’s request to 
correct his records to reflect service in Vietnam. DPAPP states 
after a review of the applicant’s master personnel records and 
the documentation submitted, they found no evidence that he 
served in the Republic of Vietnam. 

 

The complete DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant 
on 22 October 2010 for review and response within 30 days 
(Exhibit D). As of this date, this office has received no 
response. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We note that 
AFPC/DPAP verified the applicant’s service in Thule, Greenland, 
and will correct the applicant’s record after Board action. 
After a thorough review of the applicant’s submission and the 
evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of any other 
overseas service including Vietnam. Therefore, we agree with the 
opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary 
responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our 
conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error 
or injustice in regard to overseas service in Vietnam. 
Accordingly, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find 
no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this 
application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 


THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2010-01844 in Executive Session on 26 January 2011, 
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 , Panel Chair 

 , Member 

 , Member 

 

The following documentary evidence was considered in connection 
with AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2010-01844: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 11 May 10, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPAPP, dated 7 Oct 10. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 22 Oct 10. 

 

 

 

 

Panel Chair 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00511

    Original file (BC 2014 00511.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. As of this date, no response has been received by this office. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00615

    Original file (BC-2011-00615.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOE recommends the applicant’s request be denied. Promotion boards selected individuals and the quotas received determined the number that could be promoted. Additionally, we note there is insufficient evidence that substantiates the applicant is entitled to a decoration for actions taken by him during a return flight from Thule, Greenland.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01791

    Original file (BC-2010-01791.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Based on the available master personnel record, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 2 Aug 54 for a period of 4 years. ________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial, stating, in part, after a thorough review of the applicant’s personnel records, there was no mention of a TDY to Thailand in 1962 and the applicant did...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02234

    Original file (BC-2010-02234.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02234 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His award of the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM), Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal (RVCM), and the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm (RVNGC w/P) (Administratively Corrected) be added to his DD Form 214, Report of Transfer or Discharge,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04218

    Original file (BC-2010-04218.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-04218 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect the following: 1. Credited for his service in the Republic of Vietnam. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02385

    Original file (BC 2014 02385.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02385 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. His DD 214 was administratively corrected to reflect seven months and nine days of foreign service. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03242

    Original file (BC 2014 03242.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his request, the applicant provided a personal letter, a copy of his DD Form 214, and copies of his medical records. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. After a thorough review of the applicant’s official...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02609

    Original file (BC-2012-02609.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    _______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States – Report of Transfer or Discharge, does not reflect his service time in Vietnam or Thailand. Although he has been unable to provide copies of the travel vouchers for these TDYs, in view of the fact the foreign service documented on his DD Form 214 exceeds his tour length in Taiwan, as confirmed by the OPR, by 3 months and 21 days, we find the evidence...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00239

    Original file (BC 2014 00239.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00239 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect the award of the Vietnam Service Medal. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSID recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. A complete copy of the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02885

    Original file (BC 2014 02885.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant states he was never permanently stationed in Vietnam but would fly into...