Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01816
Original file (BC-2010-01816.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01816 

 INDEX CODE: 110.02, 107.00 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His records be corrected to reflect award of the: 

 

1. Air Force Commendation Medal (AFCM). 

 

2. Combat Readiness Medal (CRM). 

 

3. Presidential Unit Citation (PUC). 

 

4. Air Force Outstanding Unit Award with Valor (AFOUA w/V), 
(administratively corrected with two additional oak leaf 
clusters). 

 

5. Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross (RVNGC)(administratively corrected with Palm added). 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

While assigned to the 56th Security Police Squadron, the squadron 
earned the AFOUA w/V, RVNGC, and PUC during the Vietnam War. 

 

While assigned to the 17th Security Police Squadron, the squadron 
earned the Combat Readiness Medal. 

 

He was never awarded the AFCM for his end of tour recognition. 

 

In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of 
personal statements and extracts from his military personnel 
records. 

 

The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant entered the Regular Air Force on 17 December 1970 
and was progressively promoted to the grade of sergeant. 

 


Records reflect the applicant was assigned to the 17th Security 
Police Squadron (17 SPS), Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio, 
from 17 August 1971 to 16 August 1972; and the 56th Security 
Police Squadron (56 SPS), Nakhon Phanom, Royal Thai Air Force 
Base, Thailand, from 4 August 1972 to 11 September 1972. 

 

The AFCM is awarded to members of the Armed Forces of the United 
States who, while serving in any capacity with the Air Force 
after 24 March 1958, shall have distinguished themselves by 
meritorious achievement or service. The degree of merit must be 
distinctive, though it need not be unique. Acts of courage 
which do not involve the voluntary risk of life required for the 
Soldier’s Medal (or the Airman’s Medal now authorized for the 
Air Force may be considered for the AFCM. 

 

The CRM was authorized by the Secretary of the Air Force on 
9 March 1964, and amended 28 August 1967. The CRM is awarded to 
members of the Air Force and Air Force Reserve, and to member of 
other services 1 August 1960, for sustained individual combat or 
mission readiness or preparedness for direct weapon-system 
employment. For the purpose of this award, direct weapon-system 
employment is defined as a aircrew whose wartime mission places 
them into enemy territory or in the threat envelope of ground 
enemy defenses, a missile operation which could employ weapons 
to destroy enemy targets, individuals who directly control 
in-flight manned aircraft whose wartime mission is to seek and 
destroy enemy targets. Additionally, an individual must meet 
the following criteria: a) be a member of a unit subject to 
combat readiness reporting under Joint Chiefs of Staff 
Publication 6, Volume V (MAJCOMs, Direct Reporting Units, and 
Forward Operating Units designate qualifying duty positions and 
units), b) Complete basic and initial training and be formally 
certified as combat or mission ready in performing the command 
or unit operational mission. The individual must be subject to 
a continuous individual positional evaluation program, and c) 
Have completed 24 months of sustained combat mission readiness 
with no more than 120-calendar day break. 

 

The PUC is awarded to units of the Armed Forces of the United 
States and of cobelligerent nations, for extraordinary heroism 
in action against an armed enemy on or after 7 December 1941. 
The unit must display such gallantry, determination, and esprit 
de corps in accomplishing its mission as to set it apart from 
and above other units participating in the same campaign. The 
degree of heroism required is the same that which would warrant 
award of the Distinguished Service Cross to an individual. An 
individual assigned or permanently attached to, and also present 
for duty with a unit in the action for which the PUC is awarded 
may wear the emblem as a permanent part of their uniform. 

 

HQ AFPC/DPSIDR verified the applicant’s entitlement to the 
AFOUA w/V and two Bronze Oak Leaf Clusters, Vietnam Service 
Medal with one Bronze Service Star, the Air Force Longevity 
Service Award, the Noncommissioned Officer Professional Military 


Education Graduate Ribbon, the RVNGC with Palm, and indicated 
the applicant’s records will be administratively corrected to 
reflect these entitlements. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

HQ AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial for award of the AFCM, CRM, and 
PUC. DPSIDR states they are unable to verify the applicant was 
assigned to the 56th SPS after the PUCs were awarded nor were 
they able to locate Special Orders for the AFCM. Further, no 
official documentation was located within the applicant’s master 
personnel records verifying he was combat or mission status 
ready while assigned to Nakhon Phanom Air Base. 

 

Unit Decorations, Awards, and Campaign Participation Credits, 
AFPC 900-2, Volume II, dated 23 November 1981, reflects the 
56 SPS received the PUC for the period 1 November 1968 to 1 May 
1969 and 1 October 1969 to 30 April 1970. 

 

The complete HQ AFPC/DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

The applicant provides a Reserve Special Order and an e-mail 
from the Air Force Historical Research Agency, with attachment, 
showing the lineage and honors history of the 320th Expeditionary 
Security Forces Squadron. 

 

The applicant's complete response is at Exhibit E. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. The 
applicant’s response to the Air Force evaluation is noted; 
however, after a thorough review of the available evidence and 
the applicant’s complete submission, we find no evidence that 
his records should be corrected to show he was awarded the 
Presidential Unit Citation, Air Force Commendation Medal, or the 
Combat Readiness Medal. As such, with the exception of the 
awards that will be administratively added to his records, he 
has not provided sufficient evidence he is entitled to the 


remaining awards; therefore, we agree with the opinion and 
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility 
and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the 
applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. In 
the absence of persuasive evidence to the contrary, we find no 
basis to recommend favorable consideration of his application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered Docket Number 
BC-2010-01816 in Executive Session on 4 November 2010, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 

 

The following documentary evidence was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 15 May 10, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPSIDR, dated 24 Aug 10. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 17 Sep 10. 

 Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, undated, w/atchs. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 

 

 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-00340

    Original file (BC-2009-00340.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPSIDR states that after review of the applicant’s master personnel records, they were able to verify that the units he was assigned to during the periods in question did not receive the PUC. After a thorough review of the applicant’s submission and the available evidence of record, the Board was not persuaded that he should be awarded the PUC. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 20 Mar 09.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-01811

    Original file (BC-2008-01811.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-01811 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded all medals to which entitled, including but not limited to, the Air Force Commendation Medal (AFCM), the Combat Action Ribbon (CAR), the Presidential Unit Citation (PUC), and other combat action awards, i.e., the Combat...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-03697

    Original file (BC-2010-03697.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was informed by other military personnel that he is entitled to the requested awards based on his service in Phan Tang Air Base (AB), Republic of Vietnam. DPSIDR states that after a thorough review of the applicant’s military service records and Air Force Pamphlet 900- 2, Unit Decorations, Awards and Campaign Participation Credits, they were unable to verify his entitlement for award of the PUC. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01035

    Original file (BC-2011-01035.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01035 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Report of Separation from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect entitlement to the following medals: 1. The Combat Readiness Medal (CRM). DPSIDR states the applicant provided Flight Records, dated 3 Aug 77, that indicate combat...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01805

    Original file (BC-2012-01805.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Presidential Unit Citation (PUC). The Air Force Outstanding Unit Award with Valor (AFOUA w/V) (ADMINISTRATIVELY CORRECTED). The 8th SPS was not awarded the PUC during the applicant’s tenure of service with that unit.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03427

    Original file (BC-2011-03427.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Air Force Commendation Medal (AFCM) – administratively corrected. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05444

    Original file (BC 2013 05444.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Vietnam Service Medal with a Silver Service Star (VSM w/SSS) Army Noncommissioned Officer Professional Development Ribbon Small Arms Expert Marksmanship Ribbon with one Bronze Service Star (SAEMR w/1BSS) Air Force Training Ribbon (AFTR) ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He is authorized the requested awards and it is unclear as to why the awards from his original DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00078

    Original file (BC-2012-00078.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00078 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. Addressing the applicant’s request to be awarded the AM 1/OLC, the applicant did not provide any documentation that supports this request. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02424

    Original file (BC-2004-02424.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPPR recommends the application for award of the Purple Heart (PH) and the Air Force Commendation Medal (AFCM) be denied. We do not wish to deprive the applicant of awards to which he is entitled; however, based on the evidence before us, we have no recourse but to conclude that his request for the PH, AFCM and CRM should be denied. As to the Cold War Victory Medal, Senior...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01884

    Original file (BC-2010-01884.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His DD Form 214 issued in conjunction with his 22 August 1967 discharge reflects he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) and the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal (RVCM). The complete HQ AFPC/DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 15 Oct 10 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). ...