RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01757
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
___________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His reentry (RE) code of 4D (Grade is senior airman or sergeant,
completed at least 9 years of total active federal military (TAFMS)
service, but fewer than 16 years of TAFMS, and has not been
selected for promotion to staff sergeant) be changed to one that
will allow him to reenter the military.
___________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He realizes now that he made a mistake by getting out of the Air
Force and he wishes to be given another chance by serving in the
Air National Guard (ANG).
In support of his request, the applicant provides a copy of his
DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty,
and a personal statement.
His complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
___________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant enlisted into the Regular Air Force on 28 Aug 86. He
received an honorable discharge on 10 Dec 95 after serving 9 years,
3 months, and 13 days on active duty.
Additional relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted
from the applicants military records, are contained in the letter
prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force. Accordingly,
there is no need to recite these facts in this Record of
Proceedings.
___________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial. DPSOA states the 4D is the only RE
code for the applicant. The applicant has not provided any
evidence of an error or injustice, he just states he hopes the
Board will see his mistake and allow him to reenter in the ANG.
The DPSOA complete evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit B.
___________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant
on 17 Sep 10 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this
date, this office has received no response.
___________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of
the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its
rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has
not been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend
granting the relief sought in this application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number
BC-2010-01757 in Executive Session on 18 Nov 10, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence for Docket Number BC-2010-01757
was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 5 May 10, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 23 Apr 10.
Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 17 Sep 10.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-01016
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-01016 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 4D (Grade is Senior Airman or Sergeant, completed at least nine years Total Active Federal Military Service (TAFMS), but fewer than 16 years of TAFMS, and has not been selected for promotion to Staff Sergeant) be changed...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC 2009 01016
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-01016 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 4D (Grade is Senior Airman or Sergeant, completed at least nine years Total Active Federal Military Service (TAFMS), but fewer than 16 years of TAFMS, and has not been selected for promotion to Staff Sergeant) be changed...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00287
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00287 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry code (RE) 4D (grade is Senior Airman or Sergeant, completed at least 9 years TAFMS, but fewer than 16 years TAFMS, and has not been selected for promotion to Staff Sergeant) be changed to a code that will not bar him from enlisting in...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02969
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-02969 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. The applicant requested early separation from the Air Force with an effective date of 17 December 2012. Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 13 December 2013.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02844
The applicant has provided no evidence of a clear error or injustice related to the nonjudicial punishment action. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04397
His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, indicates his narrative reason for separation as Reduction in Force and his RE code as 4D. The remaining relevant facts, extracted from the military personnel records, are contained in the evaluations from the Air Force offices of primary responsibility at Exhibits C, D, E, and F. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOE recommends denial of the applicants...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02151
c. Block 27 - Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code be changed from a “4D” to “1A.” EXAMINER’S NOTE: The applicant’s record has been administratively corrected to add an Air Force Achievement Medal and the Jumpmaster Course. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPRS states AFI 36-2606, Reenlistment in the United States Air Force, airmen in the grade of SrA and Sgt may not reenlist if the new date of separation (DOS) will exceed the...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01640
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. The applicant was demoted based on his own action of underage drinking and again doing the same while still serving the suspended punishment for his first offense. We took notice of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-03281
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-03281 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 4H (serving suspended punishment pursuant to Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ)) be changed to allow him to join the Air Force Reserves. Because he was serving a suspended punishment that would not have...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04278
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFLOA/JAJM recommends denial of the applicants request to set aside his court-martial conviction and sentence. His allegation is based on a time discrepancy between a photograph showing a truck driving through the base gate alleged to be his and the blotter entry as well as the incident report. The complete DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit...