Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01757
Original file (BC-2010-01757.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01757 

 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

___________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His reentry (RE) code of “4D” (Grade is senior airman or sergeant, 
completed at least 9 years of total active federal military (TAFMS) 
service, but fewer than 16 years of TAFMS, and has not been 
selected for promotion to staff sergeant) be changed to one that 
will allow him to reenter the military. 

 

___________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

He realizes now that he made a mistake by getting out of the Air 
Force and he wishes to be given another chance by serving in the 
Air National Guard (ANG). 

 

In support of his request, the applicant provides a copy of his 
DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, 
and a personal statement. 

 

His complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. 

 

___________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant enlisted into the Regular Air Force on 28 Aug 86. He 
received an honorable discharge on 10 Dec 95 after serving 9 years, 
3 months, and 13 days on active duty. 

 

Additional relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted 
from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter 
prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force. Accordingly, 
there is no need to recite these facts in this Record of 
Proceedings. 

 

___________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial. DPSOA states the “4D” is the only RE 
code for the applicant. The applicant has not provided any 
evidence of an error or injustice, he just states he hopes the 
Board will see his mistake and allow him to reenter in the ANG. 


 

The DPSOA complete evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit B. 

 

___________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant 
on 17 Sep 10 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this 
date, this office has received no response. 

 

___________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice 
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of 
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of 
the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its 
rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has 
not been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the 
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend 
granting the relief sought in this application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly 
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number 
BC-2010-01757 in Executive Session on 18 Nov 10, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 , Panel Chair 

 , Member 

 , Member 

 

The following documentary evidence for Docket Number BC-2010-01757 
was considered: 


 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 5 May 10, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 23 Apr 10. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 17 Sep 10. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 

 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-01016

    Original file (BC-2009-01016.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-01016 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 4D (Grade is Senior Airman or Sergeant, completed at least nine years Total Active Federal Military Service (TAFMS), but fewer than 16 years of TAFMS, and has not been selected for promotion to Staff Sergeant) be changed...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC 2009 01016

    Original file (BC 2009 01016.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-01016 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 4D (Grade is Senior Airman or Sergeant, completed at least nine years Total Active Federal Military Service (TAFMS), but fewer than 16 years of TAFMS, and has not been selected for promotion to Staff Sergeant) be changed...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00287

    Original file (BC-2011-00287.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00287 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry code (RE) 4D (grade is Senior Airman or Sergeant, completed at least 9 years TAFMS, but fewer than 16 years TAFMS, and has not been selected for promotion to Staff Sergeant) be changed to a code that will not bar him from enlisting in...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02969

    Original file (BC 2013 02969.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-02969 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. The applicant requested early separation from the Air Force with an effective date of 17 December 2012. Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 13 December 2013.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02844

    Original file (BC-2002-02844.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant has provided no evidence of a clear error or injustice related to the nonjudicial punishment action. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04397

    Original file (BC-2010-04397.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, indicates his narrative reason for separation as “Reduction in Force” and his RE code as “4D.” The remaining relevant facts, extracted from the military personnel records, are contained in the evaluations from the Air Force offices of primary responsibility at Exhibits C, D, E, and F. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOE recommends denial of the applicant’s...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02151

    Original file (BC-2004-02151.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    c. Block 27 - Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code be changed from a “4D” to “1A.” EXAMINER’S NOTE: The applicant’s record has been administratively corrected to add an Air Force Achievement Medal and the Jumpmaster Course. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPRS states AFI 36-2606, Reenlistment in the United States Air Force, airmen in the grade of SrA and Sgt may not reenlist if the new date of separation (DOS) will exceed the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01640

    Original file (BC 2014 01640.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. The applicant was demoted based on his own action of underage drinking and again doing the same while still serving the suspended punishment for his first offense. We took notice of the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-03281

    Original file (BC-2010-03281.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-03281 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of “4H” (serving suspended punishment pursuant to Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ)) be changed to allow him to join the Air Force Reserves. Because he was serving a suspended punishment that would not have...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04278

    Original file (BC-2011-04278.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFLOA/JAJM recommends denial of the applicant’s request to set aside his court-martial conviction and sentence. His allegation is based on a time discrepancy between a photograph showing a truck driving through the base gate alleged to be his and the blotter entry as well as the incident report. The complete DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit...