Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01357
Original file (BC-2010-01357.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01357 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED 

 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His bade conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded to honorable. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

The reasons the applicant believes the records to be in error or 
unjust and the evidence submitted in support of the appeal is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from 
the applicant's military records, are contained in the letter 
prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force. 
Accordingly, there is no need to recite these facts in this 
Record of Proceedings. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AFLOA/JAJM reviewed this application and recommends denial. A 
complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant 
on 2 Jul 10 for review and response within 30 days. As of this 
date, no response has been received by this office. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 


 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice. We are 
not persuaded by the evidence presented that the characterization 
of service received by the applicant should b changed. The 
applicant’s discharge was based on his trial and conviction by a 
special court-martial. While law precludes us from reversing a 
court-martial conviction, we are authorized to correct the 
records to reflect actions taken by reviewing officials and to 
take action on the sentence of a military court based on 
clemency. There is nothing in the available record that would 
cause us to disturb the actions of the reviewing officials in 
this case. Therefore, we find no basis to favorably consider 
this application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered this application in 
Executive Session on 19 Aug 10, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603: 

 

 , Panel Chair 

, Member 

 , Member 

 


The following documentary evidence for Docket Number BC-2010-
01357 was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 8 Jan 10, w/atch. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, AFLOA/JAJM, dated 3 Jun 10. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 2 Jul 10. 

 

 

 Panel Chair 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-02418

    Original file (BC-2010-02418.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS We find no evidence which indicates the applicant’s service characterization, which had its basis in his court-martial conviction and was a part of the sentence of the military court, was improper or that it exceeded the limitations set forth in the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ). Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 23 Dec 10.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-04506

    Original file (BC-2010-04506.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS However, while convening authority subsequently approved the findings of guilty with regard to the violations of Article 134, the finding of guilty for the charge and second specification of the Article 113 violation was not approved and approved only so much of the sentence as provided for the BCD, six months of confinement, forfeiture of $249.00 pay per month for six months and a reduction to the grade of airman basic. There is no...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-02191

    Original file (BC-2010-02191.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force. We find no evidence which indicates the applicant’s service characterization, which had its basis in his court-martial conviction and was a part of the sentence of the military court, was improper or that it exceeded the limitations set forth in the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ).

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00020

    Original file (BC-2010-00020.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00020 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His bad conduct discharge be upgraded to a general (under honorable conditions) discharge or an honorable discharge. The Air Force Court of Military Review affirmed the findings and sentence on 2 March 1984. The applicant was...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00715

    Original file (BC-2010-00715.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) provided a copy of an Investigative Report, which is at Exhibit C. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force which is attached at Exhibit D. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFLOA/JAJM recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice in the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00440

    Original file (BC-2010-00440.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The members evaluated the evidence and determined that the appropriate punishment for the offense committed by the applicant was a BCD, three months confinement, forfeiture of $400.00 pay per month for three months, and reduction to airman basic. While clemency may be granted, the applicant has not provided any justification for his request, and clemency is not warranted. His submission does not include a letter or document to show rehabilitation since the time of his court-martial.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00742

    Original file (BC-2010-00742.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The commander filed the second Article 15 in his UIF. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 2 Apr 10 for review and comment within 30 days. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and applicant's submission, we are not persuaded that his uncorroborated assertions, in and by themselves, sufficiently persuasive to override the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00873

    Original file (BC-2010-00873.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00873 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His bad conduct discharge be upgraded. Based on this error, the Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals overturned the individual’s conviction and ordered a new trial. Further, we note the applicant’s case differs from U.S. v. Steen and; therefore,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01738

    Original file (BC-2011-01738.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01738 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded. We find no evidence which indicates the applicant’s service characterization, which had its basis in his court- martial conviction and was a part of the sentence of the military court, was improper or that...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-03648

    Original file (BC-2010-03648.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-03648 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded to honorable. The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. However, while we commend the applicant on his many accomplishments, when considering his overall record of service, the seriousness of the...