Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01353
Original file (BC-2010-01353.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

 AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01353 

 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His reenlistment eligibility (RE) status be changed to 
“eligible.” 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

He ended his enlistment in the West Virginia Air National Guard 
(WVANG) after completing three years with an honorable 
discharge. He satisfactorily participated in all of his drills, 
had no disciplinary problems, claims, actions against him, or 
medical issues which would have rendered him ineligible for 
reenlistment. He does not understand the “ineligible” code and 
would like to have it changed so that he can enlist in the Coast 
Guard. 

 

In support of his appeal, the applicant provides a personal 
statement and a copy of his National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22, Report of Separation and Record of Service, issued in 
conjunction with his 4 April 2000 discharge. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission is attached. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

Based on the available evidence of record, the applicant 
enlisted in the WVANG on 5 Apr 97 in the grade of senior airman 
(SrA/E-4), his grade at discharge. 

 

On 4 April 2000, he was honorably discharged from the WVANG and 
the Reserve of the Air Force under the provisions of AFI 36-
3209, with a reason for separation of expiration term of service 
and a RE status of ineligible. He was credited with 3 years of 
service during this period and 9 years, 4 months, and 27 days of 
total service for pay. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 


THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. Based upon the 
presumption of regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs 
and without evidence to the contrary, we must assume the 
applicant's discharge and reenlistment status was proper and in 
compliance with appropriate directives. While we note the 
applicant’s contentions that he is not certain as to the reasons 
surrounding his reenlistment status, should he provide 
additional information from his former unit commander or chain 
of command to support his appeal, we may be inclined to 
reconsider his petition. Therefore, based on the available 
evidence of record, we find no basis upon which to favorably 
consider this application. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2010-01353 in Executive Session on 18 November 2010, 
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

The following documentary evidence was considered: 

 

 DD Form 149, dated 7 Apr 10, with attachments. 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 

 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2004-01292

    Original file (BC-2004-01292.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 25 November 1987, his commander notified him he was being involuntarily discharged with a general (under honorable conditions) discharge. DPFOC contends no error or injustice occurred during the discharge and in the absence of evidence to the contrary, DPFOC recommends relief be denied ANG/DPFOC’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04132

    Original file (BC-2010-04132.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. ________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: NGB/A1PS recommends denial, stating, in part, based on information from the subject matter expert (SME), the applicant was discharged in accordance with (IAW) AFI 36-3209, Separation and Retirement Procedures for Air National Guard and Air Force Reserve Members, para 3.16., “Entry Level Performance and Conduct,” not a medical...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03094

    Original file (BC 2013 03094.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03094 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He receive retirement points for the period 27 Sep 10 through 1 Apr 12 rather than Incapacitation Pay (INCAP Pay). In support of his appeal, the applicant provides a personal statement; active duty orders for the period, 2 Jun – 26 Sep...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02205

    Original file (BC-2012-02205.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02205 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry Code (RE) of 2X (1st term, 2nd term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment) be changed to 3V (Separated w/Vol Sep Incentive) so he can enlist in the Utah Air National Guard. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02983

    Original file (BC-2005-02983.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-02983 INDEX CODE: 100.06 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 2C be changed to 1C allowing him the opportunity to reenlist. A1POF states he was discharged from the DEANG as a result of an Air Force Evaluation Report of his BMT experience and...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01086

    Original file (BC-2004-01086.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS: AFPC/DPPAE states, in part, that the RE code of 4J issued at the time of his discharge accurately identifies him as being in Phase I of the WBFMP and ineligible to reenlist. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00401

    Original file (BC-2012-00401.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00401 IN THE MATTER OF: COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility status of "Ineligible" be changed to allow him to enlist in the Air National Guard (ANG). We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01317

    Original file (BC-2005-01317.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005- 01317 INDEX CODE: 100.06, 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 21 OCTOBER 2006 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code be changed from “3A” to “1” to permit reentry into the military without a waiver. On 15 Jan 05, applicant was honorably released from...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02165

    Original file (BC 2013 02165.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 16 Jun 10, the applicant’s supervisor non-recommended him for reenlistment and, on the same day, the applicant’s commander non-selected him for reenlistment. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial, indicating the applicant has...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00574

    Original file (BC-2010-00574.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00574 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) code of 4I (serving on the Control Roster) be changed to allow him to reenter military service. On 10 Jul 06, he received a Letter of Reprimand (LOR), for failure to provide a proper family care plan. The applicant was discharged...