Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01184
Original file (BC-2010-01184.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: BC-2010-01184 

COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His Airman Performance Report (APR), rendered for the period 
18 September 1968 through 17 March 1969, be corrected to reflect 
that he was stationed in Guam (3rd Munitions Maintenance 
Squadron) (3 MSMS) rather than San Francisco, California (4133 
Bomb Wing) (4133 BW). 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

He was stationed in Guam but his records reflect he was stationed 
in California. He believes this error has denied him eligibility 
for certain decorations. 

 

In support of his appeal, the applicant provides a personal 
statement, copies of two of his APRs, a performance certificate, 
and excerpts of Air Force Pamphlet 900-2, Unit Decorations, 
Awards and Campaign Participation Credits. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force effective 
13 April 1966. He was progressively promoted to the grade of 
sergeant (E-4) with a date of rank of 1 February 1969. He was 
honorably released from active duty effective 12 February 1970. 
He served three years and ten months on active duty with eleven 
months and three days foreign service. 

 

The applicant appealed to the Board in 2009 (Docket Number BCMR-
2009-00668) to correct his records to reflect entitlement to the 
Air Force Outstanding Unit Award (AFOUA), Air Force Good Conduct 
Medal (AFGCM), Small Arms Expert Marksmanship Ribbon (SAEMR), 
Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm (RVGC w/P), and the 
Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal (RVCM). The Chief, Career 
Development Branch, Air Force Personnel Center, was able to 
verify the applicant’s entitlement for the AFOUA with three Oak 
Leaf Clusters, the AFGCM, and the RVGC w/P. However, they were 
unable to verify his entitlement to the SAEMR and the RVCM. On 
21 July 2009, the Board considered and denied the applicant’s 


request for the SAEMR and the RVCM. On 5 November 2009, the 
Board denied the applicant reconsideration of his request as the 
applicant did not provide any new relevant evidence. 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AFPC/DPSIDEP recommends denial. DPSIDEP states the applicant is 
not eligible to file an appeal through the Evaluation Reports 
Appeal Board. After reviewing the applicant’s records, they 
cannot confirm whether or not he or his evaluator was actually 
assigned to the 3 MMS or the 4133 BW. It appears the 4133 BW was 
a unit under the 3 MMS, stationed at Andersen Air Force Base 
(AFB), Guam; however, it is quite possible for the applicant to 
have worked directly with his evaluator and be assigned to the 
4133 BW while his evaluator was assigned to the 3 MMS. 
Nevertheless, while the applicant believes his APR reflects he 
was stationed in San Francisco, California, it does not. “APO 
San Francisco 96334” is the Army Post Office (APO) designation 
for Andersen AFB, Guam; therefore, it is accurately reflected on 
the contested APR. 

 

DPSIDEP notes the applicant’s APR closing 24 March 1968 reflects 
his assignment as Andersen AFB, Guam, rather than APO San 
Francisco 96334; however, either designation is acceptable. 

 

The complete DPSIDEP evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

He does not agree with the Air Force advisory opinion. All the 
awards his unit received are on the copies of the AFP 200-2 
excerpts he has provided. He has been wearing these awards since 
he received them and will continue to wear them until he dies. 

 

The applicant’s complete rebuttal, with attachments, is at Exhibit 
E. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We note the 
applicant is requesting a change to the contested EPR in an 
effort to qualify for certain awards. However, after reviewing 


the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the 
case, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air 
Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as 
the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the 
victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the absence of 
evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting 
the relief sought. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2010-01184 in Executive Session on 19 January 2011, 
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 , Panel Chair 

 , Member 

 , Member 

 

The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2010-01184 was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 17 Mar 10, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSIDEP, dated 3 Jun 10. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 9 Dec 10. 

 Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, dated 29 Dec 10. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03890

    Original file (BC-2012-03890.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03890 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His record be corrected to reflect he was awarded the following: a. Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He served in Guam with the 3960th Strategic Wing for 176...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC 2009 00668

    Original file (BC 2009 00668.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-00668 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect award of the Air Force Outstanding Unit Award (AFOUA), the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross (RVGC), the Air Force Good Conduct Medal (AFGCM), the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal (RVCM), the Small Arms Expert...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-04076

    Original file (BC-2008-04076.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS The AFPC/DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit C. We note that AFPC has taken action to have the applicant’s DD Form 214 corrected to reflect award of AFOUA w/1 OLC, AFGCM, VSM, AFLSA, and the RVGC w/P; therefore, the only remaining issue before this Board is his request for entitlement to the RVCM.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-02009

    Original file (BC-2005-02009.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-02009 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: Yes MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 25 Dec 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records reflect he was assigned to the 4133 Bomb Wing (4133 BW), Provisional, at Anderson AFB, Guam, for the period 17 Jul - 26 Oct 67, and was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). ...

  • AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0039

    Original file (FD2002-0039.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    (Change Discharge to Honorable & Change the RE Code) Issue 1: I would like you to review the case of my discharge from the Air Force on November 8th 1 9 8 9 . Force for a pattern of misconduct, conduct prejudicial to good order and discipline, The authority for this action is AFB 39-10, paragraph 5-47b- If my recommendation is approved, your service I am recommending will be characterized as honorable or general- that your service be characterized as general. 2 - My reasons for this action...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01932

    Original file (BC-2010-01932.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He be awarded the Air Force Combat Action Medal (AFCAM). Only one award per operation is authorized. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2010-01932 in Executive Session on 21 Oct 10, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: , Panel Chair , Member , Member The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 22 May 10.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04964

    Original file (BC 2013 04964.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04964 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect he was awarded the Vietnam Service medal (VSM) and any other awards that he may be eligible for. To be eligible, a service member must have served on TDY for 30 consecutive or 60 non-consecutive days. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The application was not timely filed and it would...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-01876

    Original file (BC-2010-01876.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS Because he is not entitled to the VSM and his service was outside the inclusive period of the award, the applicant is not eligible for the RVCM. We note the Air Force OPR has determined the applicant’s eligibility for the Air Force Outstanding Unit Award with Valor (AFOUA w/V) and will correct his records administratively.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01978

    Original file (BC-2012-01978.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force, which are at Exhibit C and D. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of his request for the RVCM and states that there is insufficient evidence in the applicant’s official military personnel record to support his claim that he served in the area of eligibility for the award....

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01030

    Original file (BC-2005-01030.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01030 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: Yes MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 27 Sep 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214 reflect award of the Joint Service Commendation Medal (JSCM), the Air Force Outstanding Unit Award with Valor (AFOUA w/V), the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM), the...