RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00926
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be
upgraded to a general (under honorable conditions) discharge.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He made a serious judgment mistake due to poor impulse control
and this resulted in his discharge.
He will be forever ashamed of his actions; however, he has since
learned to be more patient and is now a mature person.
He has devoted the last 20 years of his life to teaching youth
from inner city areas the principles and philosophy of taekwondo
so they can make more mature and healthy decisions than he did
in his youth.
In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of his
DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active
Duty, NA Form 13041, Statement of Service, and letters of
support.
The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
During the contested period, the applicant entered the Regular
Air Force on 2 Apr 85. He had three previous enlistments with
honorable discharges.
On 5 Jun 89, the applicant was notified of pending discharge
action. Specifically, the commander cited misconduct, conduct
prejudicial to good order and discipline, as the basis for
discharge.
The applicants misconduct included an Article 15, Record of
Nonjudicial Punishment, for failure to obey a lawful order; two
Letters of Reprimand for being absent without authority from his
unit and attempting to cover up a government motor vehicle
accident and trying to conceal the damage by attempting to fix
the vehicle; a civilian arrest for soliciting a male undercover
policeman to commit an indecent sexual act for money; two
instances of failure to report to his appointed place of duty
without authority, and failure to remain on standby duty.
The applicant consulted counsel, waived his rights to an
administrative discharge board hearing, and submitted statements
in his own behalf. He offered an unconditional waiver for the
suspension of his discharge for a period of probation and
rehabilitation.
The staff judge advocate found the case legally sufficient and
recommended discharge without probation and rehabilitation. On
7 Jul 89, the discharge authority directed discharge. The
applicant was discharged on 19 Jul 89 with a UOTHC discharge.
He was credited with 12 years, 1 month, and 26 days of active
service.
Pursuant to the Boards request, the Federal Bureau of
Investigations (FBI) provided an investigative report which is
at Exhibit C. On 10 Sep 10, a copy of the FBI report and a
request for post-service information was forwarded to the
applicant for review and response within 30 days (Exhibit D).
In response to the Boards request, he states the FBI report
contains inaccurate information regarding his social security
number, birth date, and arrest locations. He states he never
lived in nor has he been to Florida and his birthplace was in
Arkansas.
He provides additional support letters and employment
verification in his request for clemency.
The applicant's complete response, with attachments, is at
Exhibit E.
Based on the applicants response to the Boards request, a new
FBI report was ordered; however, the report reflected the same
information as the original FBI report (Exhibit F).
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an error or an injustice. We find
no impropriety in the characterization of applicant's discharge.
It appears that responsible officials applied appropriate
standards in effecting the separation, and we do not find
persuasive evidence which indicates pertinent regulations were
violated or the applicant was not afforded all the rights to
which he was entitled at the time of his discharge. Therefore,
we conclude the discharge proceedings were proper and
characterization of the discharge was appropriate to the
existing circumstances. Further, although the applicant states
he has been a productive member of society and has provided a
letter of explanation regarding the charges referred to in the
FBI report, the Board finds these statements insufficient to
warrant an upgrade of his discharge on the basis of clemency.
In view of the above and absent any evidence to the contrary, we
find no basis to warrant favorable action on this application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered
with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number
BC-2010-00926 in Executive Session on 26 October and 2 December
2010, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 26 Feb 10, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. FBI Report, dated 14 Jul 10.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 10 Sep 10, w/atch.
Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, dated 30 Sep 10, w/atchs.
Exhibit F. FBI Report, dated 28 Oct 10.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02190
ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-02190 INDEX CODE 106.00 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His appeal to have his 1957 general discharge upgraded to honorable be reconsidered. An FBI Report revealed a 1963 Arrest 001 for weapons possession with no disposition indicated, a 1964 Arrest 002 for unauthorized use...
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1998-01606
On 5 Apr 89, the applicant was notified by the commander that he was recommending the applicant be discharged from the Air Force under the provisions of AFR 39-10, paragraph 5-50.1, for drug abuse with service characterized as general. On 6 Jul 90, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) considered and denied applicant’s request to upgrade his discharge to honorable. Therefore, the Board recommends his discharge be upgraded to honorable and a majority of the Board recommends his RE...
On 5 Apr 89, the applicant was notified by the commander that he was recommending the applicant be discharged from the Air Force under the provisions of AFR 39-10, paragraph 5-50.1, for drug abuse with service characterized as general. On 6 Jul 90, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) considered and denied applicant’s request to upgrade his discharge to honorable. Therefore, the Board recommends his discharge be upgraded to honorable and a majority of the Board recommends his RE...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01750
In 1983, he was discharged as an Air Force Fire Fighter. On 7 Jul 83, the applicant was discharged from the Air Force with a general (under honorable conditions) discharge in the grade of airman. We have considered the applicant’s overall record of service, and the events which precipitated the discharge, and his post service information; however, we do not find the evidence presented is sufficient to compel us to recommend granting the relief sought on that basis.
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00722
On 22 Mar 04, applicant applied to the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) requesting his discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. The Board further concluded that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of the discharge. Exhibit B.
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02390
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-02390 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: CVSO HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 13 FEBRUARY 2008 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. A copy of the FBI request provided stated they were unable to identify any arrest record on the applicant, which is...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03771
For this incident, he received a record of counseling. Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPRS, dated 22 Dec 05. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 29 Dec 05.
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-02491
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 13 Dec 85, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force for a period of six years. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00868
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00868 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His undesirable (other than honorable conditions) (OTHC) discharge be upgraded to honorable. However, as of this date, no response has been received by this office. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02832
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02832 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. Furthermore, we do not find clemency is appropriate in this case since the applicant has not provided any evidence concerning his post- service activities. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of...