RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00760
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active
Duty, be corrected as follows:
1. Item 7a, Place of Entry Into Active Duty, be corrected to
reflect St. Louis MO, rather than Wiesbaden GE.
2. Item 12a, Date Entered AD This Period, be corrected to
reflect 1965 SEP 29, rather than 1973 JUL 06.
3. Item 13, Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations, and
Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized, be corrected to reflect
he was awarded the Meritorious Service Medal (MSM) on 1 Oct 91.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
His DD Form 214 is erroneous. He enlisted in the Air Force on
29 Sep 65, not 6 Jul 73. He enlisted in St. Louis, MO, not
Wiesbaden, GE. He needs his DD Form 214 to reflect 26 years of
service so he can prove his length of military service to the
Social Security Administration in order to increase his annuity.
In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of his
DD Form 214, DD Form 13, Statement of Service, AF Form 909, A1C,
A2C, A3C and AB Performance Report, as well as his MSM
Certificate and Citation.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
According to the applicants DD Form 214, dated 6 Jul 69, he
enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 29 Sep 65 in the grade of
airman basic (E-1) for a period of four years. Item 20, Place
of Entry Into Current Active Service, of his DD Form 214
indicates ST. LOUIS MO.
He was progressively promoted to the grade of senior master
sergeant (E-8), effective and with a date of rank of 1 Jan 87.
According to his most recent DD Form 214, he was relieved from
active duty on 30 Sep 91 and retired for length of service,
effective 1 Oct 91. He was credited with 26 years and 2 days of
total active service. Item 13, Decorations, Medals, Badges,
Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized, of his
DD Form 214 does not reflect he is entitled to the MSM.
On 9 Sep 10, AFPC/DPSOA notified the applicant that his
DD Form 214 covering his service from 29 Sep 65 through 9 Jul 69
already reflects his point of entry as St. Louis MO.
________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSIDRA recommends denial of the applicants request for
the MSM, indicating they were unable to locate official
documentation within the applicants military personnel record
concerning award of the MSM. The applicant provided a copy of
the MSM certificate and citation; however, a copy of the special
order awarding him the MSM was not provided or located within
his official military personnel records. In correspondence
dated 9 Jul 10, he states he has been unable to locate the
special order. AFPC/DPSIDRA is unable to verify his entitlement
to the MSM without it.
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIDRA evaluation is at Exhibit C.
AFPC/DPSOA indicates the applicants DD Form 214, which
documents his service from 29 Sep 65 through 6 Jul 69, already
reflects his point of entry (POE) as St. Louis MO.
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit D.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the
applicant on 15 Oct 10 for review and comment within 30 days.
As of this date, no response has been received by this office
(Exhibit D).
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the requirement to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice to warrant
changing the date and place of entry into active duty reflected
on the applicants last DD Form 214. After a thorough review of
the evidence of record and the applicants complete submission,
we are not persuaded he has been the victim of an error or
injustice. In this respect, we note that at the time of the
applicants service, the procedures for reenlistment required
him to be discharged for the purpose of immediate reenlistment
at various points throughout his career. As such, the contested
DD Form 214 correctly reflects the date and place of entry into
active duty for that particular period of service. We also note
that his initial DD Form 214, documenting his service from
29 Sep 65 through 6 Jul 69, already reflects the requested
corrections. Notwithstanding the above, sufficient relevant
evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an
error or injustice warranting correction to the contested
DD Form 214 to reflect award of the MSM. In this respect, we
note the MSM certificate and citation provided by the applicant
in support of his appeal. They reflect that he was awarded the
MSM for meritorious service during the period 26 May 89 to
30 Sep 91. Having no basis to question the validity of the
certificate and the accompanying citation, we recommend the
applicants records be corrected as indicated below.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to show that he was
awarded the Meritorious Service Medal (MSM) for meritorious
service during the period 26 May 1989 to 30 September 1991.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2010-00760 in Executive Session on 16 Nov 10, under
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
All members voted to correct the records as recommended. The
following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2010-00760 was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 22 Feb 10, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSIDRA, dated 4 Aug 10.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 9 Sep 10.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 15 Oct 10.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04002
(Entitlement verified will be administratively corrected) _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The applicant asserts that other members of his units received the AFOUA w/V &1OLC and the RVNGC w/P and two Bronze Service Stars, while serving in Vietnam. A letter from the Air Force Historical Research Agency (AFHRA) to a member of his unit clearly states the AFOUA w/2 Vs is authorized because all detachments to this unit share...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-01828
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01828 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The applicant requests that her late father’s records be corrected to reflect his entitlement to the following awards and decorations: 1. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIDRA recommends...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-03659
His Airman Performance Reports (APR), rendered for the periods 7 Feb 69 through 30 Sep 69 and 1 Oct 69 through 31 Mar 70, be removed from his records, or the overall rating for each be upgraded to a 9. 2. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC 2010 02708
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02708 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His deceased fathers records be corrected to reflect he was awarded the following awards: 1. While the applicant could not provide a copy of the order awarding the deceased member the JSCM, we believe the applicant has raised reasonable doubt that...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02893
He was awarded a decoration in recognition of his long and outstanding service to the Air Force; by amendment the applicant requests award of the Air Force Achievement Medal (AFAM). He wants the Air Force Achievement Medal (AFAM) for his long outstanding service. Since it appears the SDN number is correct as presently constructed and the applicant has not provided sufficient evidence to show otherwise, we find no basis to recommend changing it.
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01739
The AFOSR-S and the AFOSR-L were authorized on 12 Oct 80, and awarded to Air Force active duty, Reserve, and National Guard personnel who have been awarded credit for an OS tour after 1 Sep 80. In this regard, the AFOSR-S and the AFOSR-L were authorized on 12 Oct 80 for those members who had been credited with an OS tour after 1 Sep 80. The applicant did not complete an OS tour after that date.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02808
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He received an MSM upon his retirement. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03124
The PH is awarded for wounds received as a direct result of enemy actions (i.e., gunshot or shrapnel wounds, hand-to-hand combat wounds, forced aircraft bailout injuries, etc.). On 20 Sep 11, AFPC/DPSIDRA notified the applicant of their determination of his entitlement to four Bronze Service Stars (BSS) to his previously awarded Vietnam Service Medal (VSM), the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm (RVNGC w/P), the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal (RVCM), and their action...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03069
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIDRA recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of error or injustice. According to the applicants official military records, he served in Vietnam from 31 Mar 69 to 24 Sep 69, for a total of 5 months and 24 days. A...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2001-03610
A complete copy of the Medical Consultant’s evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPD recommended denial, indicating that a review of the disability processing records does not show any variances from normal procedures for a member in the Air Force Disability Evaluation System (DES). Applicant’s complete response, with attachment, is at Exhibit G. _________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: DFAS-POCC indicated that their records show that...