Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00694
Original file (BC-2010-00694.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
 

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00694 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His reentry (RE) code of 2Q (Personnel medically retired or 
discharged) be changed to a code that would allow him to 
reenlist. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

He believes he was misled during his separation process as to his 
eligibility to reenlist. 

 

In support of his request, the applicant provides personal 
statements and a copy of his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release 
or Discharge from Active Duty. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 2 May 2006. 

 

During Basic Military Training (BMT) on 7 May 2006, the applicant 
fell while marching and started to feel pain in his right elbow. 
He was medically treated and placed on medical hold on 8 May 
2006. He was later diagnosed with a radial head fracture. 

 

A Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) convened on 1 August 2006 and 
referred his case to an Informal Physical Evaluation Board (IPEB) 
with a diagnosis of right radial head fracture. On 18 August 
2006, the IPEB found him unfit for further military service and 
recommended discharge with severance pay. The applicant agreed 
with the findings and recommended disposition of the IPEB. On 
21 August 2006, the Office of the Secretary of the Air Force 
directed the applicant be separated from active service for 
physical disability. He served 3 months and 23 days on active 
duty. 


 

Airman are given entry-level separation/uncharacterized service 
characterization when separation is initiated in the first 
180 days continuous active service. The Department of Defense 
(DOD) determined if a member served less than 180 days continuous 
active service, it would be unfair to the member and the service 
to characterize their limited service. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial. DPSOA states the RE code is 
correct based on SAF directed discharge for physical disability 
with severance pay. 

 

The DPSOA complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

 

AFPC/DPSD recommends denial. DPSD states the correct RE code 
for a person who is approved for a medical retirement or 
separation is 2Q. The preponderance of evidence reflects that no 
error or injustice occurred during the disability process or at 
time of separation 

 

The DPSD complete evaluation is at Exhibit D. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

The applicant reviewed the evaluation and states that an 
injustice occurred during his discharge processing. He was 
misled (not necessarily intentionally) into making a decision 
that significantly changed his life and completely ended his 
lifelong dream to serve in the military. He would not have ended 
his career had he known that it would have been 100 percent 
permanent. He thought he was making an informed decision when in 
fact he was acting on incorrect information. 

 

The applicant's complete response, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit F. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 

 


3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice 
of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of 
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation 
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its 
rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not 
been the victim of an error or injustice. The RE code “2Q” was 
the appropriate code given the circumstances of the applicant’s 
discharge. A “2” series RE code bars immediate reenlistment. 
However, it is at the discretion of any branch of service to 
determine if a waiver is appropriate. Therefore, in the absence 
of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend 
granting the relief sought in this application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2010-00694 in Executive Session on 30 September 2010, 
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 

 

 

The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2010-00694 was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 17 February 2010, w/atch. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant’s Master Personnel Record. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 5 April 2010. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPSD, dated 12 April 2010. 

 Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 11 June 2010. 

 Exhibit F. Letter, Applicant, 6 April 2010, w/atchs. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 

 

 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00670

    Original file (BC-2011-00670.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00670 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry code (RE) 2Q (approved medical retirement or separation) be changed to allow him to reenter the Armed Services. On 6 November 2006, the Secretary of the Air Force directed the applicant be separated from the service for physical disability...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00915

    Original file (BC-2010-00915.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPSOA states the applicant’s RE code should have been changed to “2Q.” As such, his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, will be corrected to reflect the RE code “2Q” unless the Board directs otherwise. The complete DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS: During the time of his recommended discharge, he was confused and had no guidance. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02882

    Original file (BC-2010-02882.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02882 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 2Q (personnel medically retired or discharged) be changed to a code that allows him to reenlist. On 31 Oct 06, the IPEB concurred with the MEB findings and determined the applicant’s injury existed prior to service and was...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC 2010 02760

    Original file (BC 2010 02760.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02760 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 2Q (Personnel medically retired or discharged) be changed to a code that would allow him to reenlist. On 29 September 2009, the Office of the Secretary of the Air Force directed the applicant be separated from active service...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC 2010 02762

    Original file (BC 2010 02762.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02762 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry code (RE) 2Q (approved medical retirement or separation) be changed to allow him to reenlist in the Air Force. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-02945

    Original file (BC-2010-02945.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS On 20 Aug 04, a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) found the applicant unfit for continued military service based on his diagnosis of delusional disorder and referred him to the Informal Physical Evaluation Board (IPEB). AFPC/DPSD recommends denial, indicating the preponderance of the evidence reflects that no error or injustice occurred during the disability process or at the time of separation.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01244

    Original file (BC-2010-01244.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01244 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code of 2Q (Personnel Medically Retired or Discharged) be changed to a code that will allow him to reenlist in the Air Force Reserve. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00092

    Original file (BC-2010-00092.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00092 INDEX CODE: 112.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 2Q (Personnel medically retired or discharged) be changed to RE code 1Q (Eligible to reenlist, career airmen with more than 20 years TAFMS, selected by the commander under the SRP, and either 13 months or...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01015

    Original file (BC-2010-01015.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01015 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 2Q (Personnel medically retired or discharged) and separation code JFL (Disability, Severance Pay) be changed to allow him to reenter military service. The MEB referred his case to the Informal Physical Evaluation Board...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00348

    Original file (BC-2011-00348.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00348 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His separation code JFL (Discharge – Disability, Severance Pay) and his reentry code (RE) 2Q (personnel medically retired or discharged) be changed to a code that qualifies him to reenter the service. The applicant’s complete letter is at Exhibit...