Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00092
Original file (BC-2010-00092.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00092 

 INDEX CODE: 112.00 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: YES 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His reentry (RE) code of 2Q (Personnel medically retired or 
discharged) be changed to RE code 1Q (Eligible to reenlist, 
career airmen with more than 20 years TAFMS, selected by the 
commander under the SRP, and either 13 months or less remain 
before original ETS, or the airmen are serving on an extension of 
enlistment (don’t separate airmen with this RE code)) or to a 
code that would allow him to reenlist. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

At the time of his lower back injury, Air Force doctors chose to 
put his results forward for a medical board without allowing him 
sufficient time to heal. After the package was submitted, the 
physical therapy began easing the pain. Before he was discharged 
pending the medical evaluation board, his pain settled to around 
a two on the 1-10 scale. His pain is now at a zero, five months 
after discharge. If his case is approved, he understands that he 
would be obligated to refund the severance pay he received. 

 

In support of his request, the applicant provides a personal 
statement and documents extracted from his military personnel 
records. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 26 April 2000. 

 

A Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) convened on 15 January 2009 and 
referred his case to an Informal Physical Evaluation Board (IPEB) 
with a diagnosis of Degenerative Disk Disease with chronic low 
back pain. On 6 May 2009, the IPEB found him unfit for further 
military service and recommended discharge with severance pay 
with a disability rating of 20%. The applicant agreed with the 


findings and recommended disposition of the IPEB. On 5 June 
2009, the Office of the Secretary of the Air Force directed the 
applicant be separated from active service for physical 
disability. He served 9 years, 3 months and 29 days on active 
duty with 3 years, 11 months and 18 days of Foreign service. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AFPC/DPSD recommends denial. DPSD states the correct RE code for 
a person who is approved for a medical retirement or separation 
is 2Q. The preponderance of evidence reflects that no error or 
injustice occurred during the disability process or at time of 
separation. 

 

The DPSD complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

 

AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial. DPSOA states the applicant is 
questioning his discharge processing based on his pain now being 
at “0” (5 months after discharge). The applicant concurred with 
the IPEB’s findings and chose not to appeal their decision. The 
RE code is correct based on the SAF directed discharge for 
physical disability with severance pay. 

 

The DPSOA complete evaluation is at Exhibit D. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

On 11 June 2010, copies of the Air Force evaluations were 
forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days 
(Exhibit E). As of this date, this office has received no 
response. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was timely filed. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. After a 
thorough review of the evidence of record, it is our opinion that 
given the circumstances surrounding his separation from the Air 
Force, the RE code assigned was proper and in compliance with the 
appropriate instructions. In addition, the applicant has not 
provided any evidence which would lead us to believe that a 
change to his RE code to allow him to reenlist is warranted. 


Therefore, we agree with the opinion and the recommendation of 
the Air Force offices of primary responsibility and adopt their 
rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has 
failed to sustain his burden of proof of the existence of an 
error or injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the 
contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief 
sought in this application. 

 

4. The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not 
been shown that a personal appearance with or without counsel 
will materially add to our understanding of the issues involved. 
Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably considered. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2010-00092 in Executive Session on 21 September 2010, 
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 

 

 

The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2010-00092 was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 7 January 2010, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant’s Master Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSD, dated 24 February 2010. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 9 April 2010. 

 Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 11 June 2010. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2007-00092

    Original file (BC-2007-00092.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-00092 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 2Q, which denotes “personnel medically retired or discharged”, be changed to one which will allow him to reenlist in the military. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC 2010 02760

    Original file (BC 2010 02760.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02760 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 2Q (Personnel medically retired or discharged) be changed to a code that would allow him to reenlist. On 29 September 2009, the Office of the Secretary of the Air Force directed the applicant be separated from active service...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00694

    Original file (BC-2010-00694.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00694 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 2Q (Personnel medically retired or discharged) be changed to a code that would allow him to reenlist. A Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) convened on 1 August 2006 and referred his case to an Informal Physical Evaluation Board...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01015

    Original file (BC-2010-01015.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01015 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 2Q (Personnel medically retired or discharged) and separation code JFL (Disability, Severance Pay) be changed to allow him to reenter military service. The MEB referred his case to the Informal Physical Evaluation Board...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-00936

    Original file (BC-2009-00936.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-00936 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code of 2Q (Personnel Medically Retired or Discharged) be changed to a code that reflects his current medical condition, allowing him to be eligible to reenlist. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSD evaluation is at...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC 2009 00936

    Original file (BC 2009 00936.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-00936 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code of 2Q (Personnel Medically Retired or Discharged) be changed to a code that reflects his current medical condition, allowing him to be eligible to reenlist. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSD evaluation is at...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01244

    Original file (BC-2010-01244.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01244 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code of 2Q (Personnel Medically Retired or Discharged) be changed to a code that will allow him to reenlist in the Air Force Reserve. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00915

    Original file (BC-2010-00915.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPSOA states the applicant’s RE code should have been changed to “2Q.” As such, his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, will be corrected to reflect the RE code “2Q” unless the Board directs otherwise. The complete DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS: During the time of his recommended discharge, he was confused and had no guidance. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC 2009 01203

    Original file (BC 2009 01203.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-01203 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His 4K (Medically disqualified for continued service, or the airman is pending evaluation by a Medical Evaluation Board/Physical Evaluation Board (MEB/PEB)) reentry (RE) code be changed to allow him to reenlist. The DD Form 214 reflects the status...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-01203

    Original file (BC-2009-01203.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-01203 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His 4K (Medically disqualified for continued service, or the airman is pending evaluation by a Medical Evaluation Board/Physical Evaluation Board (MEB/PEB)) reentry (RE) code be changed to allow him to reenlist. The DD Form 214 reflects the status...