Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01015
Original file (BC-2010-01015.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01015 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: YES 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His reentry (RE) code of 2Q (Personnel medically retired or 
discharged) and separation code JFL (Disability, Severance Pay) 
be changed to allow him to reenter military service. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

He was informed by separations that if his condition could be 
corrected he could reenter military service. When he attempted 
to reenter he was told that he could not due to his RE code. 

 

In support of his request, the applicant provides a copy of his 
DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge From Active 
Duty, and a letter from his physician and congressman. 

 

The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

On 13 Jan 00, the applicant contracted his enlistment in the 
Regular Air Force. He was progressively promoted to the grade of 
staff sergeant, having assumed the grade effective and with a 
date of rank of 1 Jun 03. He served as an Aerospace Maintenance 
Journeyman. 

 

While on active duty the applicant was involved in a motor 
vehicle accident. He was treated and diagnosed with chronic 
thoracic back pain. He underwent a Medical Evaluation Board 
(MEB) on 12 Oct 04. The MEB referred his case to the Informal 
Physical Evaluation Board (IPEB). The IPEB found the applicant 
unfit and recommended discharge with severance pay with a 10 
percent disability rating. On 23 Dec 04, the applicant concurred 
with the findings and recommendation of the IPEB. 

 

On 21 Jan 05, the Secretary of the Air Force (SAF) directed the 
applicant be discharged for a physical disability with severance 
pay. 

 


On 19 Mar 05, he was honorably discharged with severance pay with 
a 10 percent disability rating. He served five years, two months 
and seven days of active service. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AFPC/DPSD recommends denial. DPSD notes the AF Form 356, Findings and Recommended Disposition of USAF Physical Evaluation 
Boards, dated 1 Nov 04, stated the applicant’s medical condition 
prevented him from reasonably performing the duties of his 
office, grade, rank or rating. DPSD states the RE code 2Q is the 
correct code for an individual who was approved for a medical 
retirement or separation. DPSD further states the preponderance 
of evidence reflects that no error or injustice occurred during 
the disability process or at the time of separation. 

 

The complete AFPC/DPSD evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

 

AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial. DPSOA notes the applicant’s 
narrative reason for separation was “Disability, Severance Pay”, 
and he received $20,607.00 in severance pay. DPSOA further 
states it is not the RE code that is preventing the applicant 
from reentering military service, but each military component’s 
policies regarding RE codes; as each service component decides 
what they will and will not waive. 

 

The complete AFPC/DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit D. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the 
applicant on 2 Jul 10, for review and comment within 30 days. As 
of this date, no response has been received by this office. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or an injustice. We took 
notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the 
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinions and 
recommendations of the Air Force offices of primary responsibility 
and adopt their rationale as the basis for our decision that the 


applicant has failed to sustain his burden of proof of the 
existence of either an error or injustice. Therefore, in the 
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend 
granting the relief sought in this application. 

 

4. The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not 
been shown that a personal appearance with or without counsel 
will materially add to our understanding of the issue(s) 
involved. Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably 
considered. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant is notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly 
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2010-01015 in Executive Session on 1 Sep 10, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 , Panel Chair 

 , Member 

 , Member 

 

The following documentary evidence was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 10 Mar 10, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSD, dated 14 Apr 10. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 28 May 10. 

 Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 2 Jul 10. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01244

    Original file (BC-2010-01244.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01244 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code of 2Q (Personnel Medically Retired or Discharged) be changed to a code that will allow him to reenlist in the Air Force Reserve. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01547

    Original file (BC-2011-01547.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 17 Dec 04, the Informal Physical Evaluation Board (IPEB) found the applicant unfit for continued service and recommended discharge with severance pay with a 10 percent disability rating for asthma. The complete DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 26 Aug 11, copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days. We took...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00348

    Original file (BC-2011-00348.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00348 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His separation code JFL (Discharge – Disability, Severance Pay) and his reentry code (RE) 2Q (personnel medically retired or discharged) be changed to a code that qualifies him to reenter the service. The applicant’s complete letter is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04254

    Original file (BC-2010-04254.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 18 Sep 07, a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) found the applicant unfit for continued military service for inflammatory bowel disease, most likely Crohn’s disease, and referred him to the Informal Physical Evaluation Board (IPEB). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force, which are attached at Exhibits C, D, and E. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04902

    Original file (BC-2010-04902.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 18 Sep 07, a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) found the applicant unfit for continued military service for inflammatory bowel disease, most likely Crohn’s disease, and referred him to the Informal Physical Evaluation Board (IPEB). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force, which are attached at Exhibits C, D, and E. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC 2009 01203

    Original file (BC 2009 01203.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-01203 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His 4K (Medically disqualified for continued service, or the airman is pending evaluation by a Medical Evaluation Board/Physical Evaluation Board (MEB/PEB)) reentry (RE) code be changed to allow him to reenlist. The DD Form 214 reflects the status...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-01203

    Original file (BC-2009-01203.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-01203 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His 4K (Medically disqualified for continued service, or the airman is pending evaluation by a Medical Evaluation Board/Physical Evaluation Board (MEB/PEB)) reentry (RE) code be changed to allow him to reenlist. The DD Form 214 reflects the status...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-00936

    Original file (BC-2009-00936.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-00936 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code of 2Q (Personnel Medically Retired or Discharged) be changed to a code that reflects his current medical condition, allowing him to be eligible to reenlist. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSD evaluation is at...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC 2009 00936

    Original file (BC 2009 00936.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-00936 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code of 2Q (Personnel Medically Retired or Discharged) be changed to a code that reflects his current medical condition, allowing him to be eligible to reenlist. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSD evaluation is at...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00694

    Original file (BC-2010-00694.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00694 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 2Q (Personnel medically retired or discharged) be changed to a code that would allow him to reenlist. A Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) convened on 1 August 2006 and referred his case to an Informal Physical Evaluation Board...