Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-01190
Original file (BC-2009-01190.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-01190 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His records be corrected to reflect that his service-connected 
medical conditions were caused by an instrumentality of war. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

He did not understand the importance of stating that he was 
involved in an aircraft battle damage repair operation during a 
simulated combat exercise. 

 

In support of his request, applicant provides copies of a denial 
letter pertaining to his claim for Combat-Related Special 
Compensation (CRSC), AF Form 356, Findings and Recommended 
Disposition of USAF Physical Evaluation Board, DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, and two 
statements of support. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

A Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) convened on 11 Jan 94, to 
determine whether he should be continued on active duty due to 
the diagnosis of major depression and associated Ganzer’s 
syndrome, and seizure disorder. The MEB referred him to an 
Informal Physical Evaluation Board (IPEB). 

 

On 27 Jan 94, an IPEB convened and determined he was unfit for 
continued active duty service and recommended temporary 
retirement with a compensable disability rating of 60 percent. 
He agreed with the findings and recommendations of the IPEB and 
his name was placed on the Temporary Disability Retired List 
(TDRL). On 21 Aug 95, during a TDRL re-evaluation, he was again 
diagnosed with major depression, recurrent, moderated, associated 
with Ganzer’s Syndrome, and partial complex seizures. On 12 Sep 
95, the IPEB recommended the applicant’s name be removed from the 
TDRL and that he be permanently disability retired with a 
combined disability rating of 60 percent. The applicant accepted 
the decision of the IPEB, which included the notation that his 


medical conditions were not the direct result of armed conflict, 
nor the direct result of a combat-related injury, nor caused by 
an instrumentality of war. On 7 Oct 95, he was permanently 
disability retired under the provisions of AFI 36-3212, Physical 
Evaluation for Retention, Retirement and Separation, due to major 
depressive disorder associated with Ganzer’s Syndrome, with 
considerable industrial impairment, and partial complex seizures 
with secondary generalization. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

The BCMR Medical Consultant recommends denial of the applicant’s 
request to change his records to reflect that his service-
connected disabilities were caused by an instrumentality of war. 

 

The BCMR Medical Consultant indicates the applicant reportedly 
sustained an accidental fall from an aircraft wing in 1979. 
After a self-inflicted injury to his hand with a hammer he then 
passed out and fell to the floor striking his head. Although 
there is a nexus between the applicant’s secondary unfitting 
diagnosis and his military service, the major depression and 
partial complex seizures were not the direct result of combat or 
caused by an instrumentality of war. 

 

The BCMR Medical Consultant acknowledges the aircraft upon which 
the applicant worked, in this instance, was indeed an 
instrumentality of war. However, the applicant’s disabling 
conditions, which began with striking his hand with a hammer, 
were not caused by the instrumentality of war. The hammer which 
struck the applicant’s hand, followed by his accidental fall to 
the floor, is not considered the direct result of or caused by an 
instrumentality of war. Additionally, there is no evidence that 
the applicant’s delayed onset of major depression and complex 
partial seizures were the direct result of his combat training 
experiences, notwithstanding the fact the applicant was a 
participant in an exercise in 1979, when he struck his hand and 
fell to the floor. The Medical Consultant opines the applicant 
has not met the burden of proof of an error or injustice that 
warrants the requested change of the record. 

 

The complete BCMR Medical Consultant’s Evaluation, with 
attachments, is at Exhibit C. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant 
on 12 Mar 10, for review and comment within 30 days. As of this 
date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D). 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was timely filed. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. After a 
thorough review of the available evidence of record, it is our 
opinion that the service-connected medical conditions the 
applicant believes are combat-related were not incurred as the 
direct result of armed conflict, while engaged in hazardous 
service, in the performance of duty under conditions simulating 
war, or through an instrumentality of war. Therefore, we agree 
with the opinion and recommendation of the BCMR Medical 
Consultant and adopt his rationale as the basis for our 
conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or 
injustice. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find 
no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this 
application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2009-01190 in Executive Session on 4 Aug 10, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 , Panel Chair 

 , Member 

 , Member 

 


The following documentary evidence was considered under Docket 
Number BC-2009-01190: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 20 Mar 09, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, BCMR Medical Consultant, dated 9 Mar 10, 

 w/atchs. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 12 Mar 10. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC 2009 01190

    Original file (BC 2009 01190.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant recommends denial of the applicant’s request to change his records to reflect that his service- connected disabilities were caused by an instrumentality of war. Additionally, there is no evidence that the applicant’s delayed onset of major depression and complex partial seizures were the direct result of his combat training experiences, notwithstanding the fact the applicant...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00395

    Original file (BC 2014 00395.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00395 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His retirement order be corrected to reflect his disabilities were received in the line of duty as the direct result of armed conflict, caused by an instrumentality of war, incurred in the line of duty during a period of war, or were the direct result of a combat related injury. While we note the applicant’s...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01541

    Original file (BC-2005-01541.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 14 Sep 88, the IPEB recommended that the applicant be permanently retired from the Air Force with a combined disability rating of 100%. The DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant recounts his previous contentions and requested his case be administratively closed (see Exhibit E). Based upon a review of the available evidence of record and the documentation provided in support...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-00552

    Original file (BC-2007-00552.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Both Boards recommended permanent retirement with a disability rating of 40 percent. DPPD therefore recommends his record be corrected to show he was retired by reason of physical disability for fibromyalgia with a permanent disability rating of 60 percent. AFPC/DPPD’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Counsel for the applicant states while the BCMR Medical Consultant’s advisory...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-1999-00390-2

    Original file (BC-1999-00390-2.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    BC-1999-00390, the applicant requested that his record be corrected to reflect that his compensable disability rating of 60 percent be changed to 75 percent on the basis of unemployability. He maintains that these findings should have been reflected in his Air Force medical evaluation for permanent and total disability and should have been separately rated at the PEB. The applicant’s complete responses, with attachments, are at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9900820

    Original file (9900820.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Regarding award of the DFC, prior to 14 Aug 43, this decoration was awarded on the basis of 35 missions of operational flight against the enemy. A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Counsel reviewed the advisory opinion and stated the applicant’s injury was the result of damage to the aircraft by enemy flak during a bomb run, and, therefore, was a direct result of...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00145

    Original file (PD2009-00145.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    Discussion: The CI was diagnosed with PTSD and was found unfit for PTSD at 10%. VARD (diagnosed as Tinnitus) 20080516 and rated it at 10% based on exam of 20080107: The condition is noted in your service treatment records as of May 3, 2007; We have assigned a 10 percent evaluation based on examination findings that has determined, your tinnitus is persistent in nature; the diagnosis that has been given is ringing in the left ear. There is no hearing loss present on the right and there is...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01909

    Original file (PD-2013-01909.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The seizure condition, characterized as “PCS (partial complex seizures) with secondary generalization,” was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501 with no other conditions submitted by the MEB.ThePEB adjudicated “partial complex seizure disorder with secondary generalization,” rated 40%,citing criteria of the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) and placed the CI on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) effective on 13 December 1998 to allow the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00677

    Original file (BC-2007-00677.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant disagreed with the IPEB findings and requested a Formal Physical Evaluation Board (FPEB). FPEB findings, dated 5 July 1991, found the applicant’s condition was stable and recommended permanent disability retirement at seventy (70) percent. After a thorough review of the available evidence of record, it is our opinion that the service-connected medical conditions that resulted in the applicant’s disability retirement were not combat-related or through an instrumentality of war.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019991

    Original file (20140019991.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Whether the applicant was exposed to lead during active duty, including while employed as a rifle instructor, which involved working with rifles and ammunition; b. if yes, whether the source of any such lead exposure constitutes an "instrumentality of war" within the definition of Title 10, U.S. Code, subsection 1413a(e)(2)(D) (10 USC 1413a(e)(2)(D)); and c. if yes, whether any of the applicant's service-connected disabilities, including his central nervous system dysfunction, constitute a...