Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-01953
Original file (BC-2009-01953.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-01953

INDEX CODE: 106.00

XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE

HEARING DESIRED: NO

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His Under Other Than Honorable Conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to General.

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

The circumstances surrounding his discharge are that he was involved in a civil check writing case. He was young and impressionable and did not understand the ramifications of his actions on the rest of his life. He truly regrets the incident and offers his apologies to the Air Force. Since his discharge, he has lived a moral and honest life, not committing any other violations of law. He has paid his debt to society and wants to clear his name before it’s too late and give his children the knowledge that their father was a good and decent man.

In support of his request, the applicant provides a letter of explanation and copies of his DD Forms 214, Report of Separation From the Armed Forces of the United States.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

Applicant’s military records indicate he enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 5 Jul 55 as an airman basic (E-1) for a period of four years and was progressively promoted to the grade of airman first class (E-4) effective and with a date of rank of 1 Jun 57. Applicant reenlisted on 12 Jul 57 for a period of six years.

On 21 Aug 58, the applicant’s commander recommended his involuntary discharge from the Air Force for his arrest and conviction by civil authorities for forgery.

On 3 Sep 58, the discharge authority approved the commander’s request, directing the involuntary discharge of the applicant. On 19 Sep 58, the applicant was involuntarily discharged from the Air Force with his service characterized as Under Other Than Honorable Conditions (UOTHC). He was credited with 2 years, 11 months and 25 days of total active service.

The applicant responded to the Board’s request for post-service information by providing a copy of his resume and two character references (Exhibit D).

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we find no evidence of an error or injustice that occurred in the discharge processing. Based on the available evidence of record, it appears the applicant’s UOTHC discharge for his criminal conviction by civil authorities was consistent with the substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and within the commander’s discretionary authority. He has provided no evidence which would lead us to believe the characterization of his service was improper or contrary to the provisions of the governing directive. We considered upgrading the discharge based on clemency; however, we do not find the evidence presented is sufficient to compel us to recommend granting the relief sought on that basis. In view of the foregoing, and in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we conclude that no basis exists to upgrade the applicant’s UOTHC discharge.

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2009-01953 in Executive Session on 20 Oct 09, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

Ms. Rita S. Looney, Panel Chair

Ms. Mary Jane Mitchell, Member

Ms. Glenda H. Scheiner, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 22 May 09, w/atchs.

Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.

Exhibit C.  Letter, AFBCMR, dated 4 Aug 09.

Exhibit D.  Post Service Documentation Provided by the

Applicant.

RITA S. LOONEY

Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-02237

    Original file (BC-2009-02237.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS Therefore, a majority of the Board concludes the applicant's discharge should be upgraded to honorable. The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that on 16 March 1983, he was honorably discharged and furnished an Honorable Discharge certificate.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02271

    Original file (BC-2004-02271.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: BC-2004-02271 INDEX CODE 106.00 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: Yes _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His 1958 Bad Conduct Discharge (BCD) with service characterized as Under-Other-Than-Honorable-Conditions (UOTHC) be upgraded. [Note: Court-martial records were obtained for the Board’s review--see Exhibit B.] After a thorough...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02048

    Original file (BC-2004-02048.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. Based on their review of the applicant’s complete military record, they did not locate any documentation verifying his entitlement to the requested awards. After reviewing the documentation submitted by the applicant with his rebuttal to the Air Force evaluation, we have determined he does not meet the requirements for award of either the Air Force Recognition Ribbon (AFRR) or NCO PME Graduate Ribbon (NCOPMER).

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01480

    Original file (BC-2004-01480.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Based on available documentation in the file, they found the discharge consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation. A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit D. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 1 Jul 04 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, no response has been received by this...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02023

    Original file (BC-2003-02023.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was credited with 1 year, 4 months, and 18 days of active duty service (excludes 126 days lost time due to being AWOL, extra duty and confinement). The applicant was properly evaluated for evidence of mental illness at the time of his discharge and none was found. A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-00256

    Original file (BC-2008-00256.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-00256 INDEX CODE: 110.00 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His undesirable discharge be upgraded to a general (under honorable conditions) discharge. The Board finds no impropriety in the characterization of applicant's discharge. RITA S. LOONEY Panel Chair AFBCMR...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02450

    Original file (BC-2004-02450.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02450 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The reason for his discharge be changed, and all references to “drug dependency” be removed from his records. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPRS recommended denial...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02125

    Original file (BC-2004-02125.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02125 INDEX NUMBER: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His bad conduct discharge be upgraded to an under honorable conditions (general) discharge. The military judge found him guilty on all charges and sentenced him to a bad conduct discharge (BCD), confinement for 18...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02429

    Original file (BC-2004-02429.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his request, applicant provided a copy of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge). Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPAPP, dated 24 Sep 04, w/atch. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 1 Oct 04.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01003

    Original file (BC 2014 01003.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01003 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He receive active duty credit for the period of time he spent in the Army National Guard (ANG) prior to enlisting in the Air Force. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at...