RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-00219
INDEX NUMBER: 107.00
XXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or
Discharge, be corrected to reflect his previously awarded Air Medal, Sixth
Oak Leaf Cluster (AM, 6 OLC).
_________________________________________________________________
THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He was awarded the AM, 6OLC; however, the requested decoration is not
reflected on his DD Form 214, issued 30 Nov 62. His former commander’s
letter, dated 4 Mar 45 and his flight records attest to the fact that he
completed 35 combat missions over enemy territory.
In support of the appeal, the applicant submits a statement from the former
303rd Bombardment Group commander recommending him for an assignment, which
listed his decorations as the AM, 5OLCs, and a list of his combat missions.
Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant is a former member of the Army Air Corps who served in the
European Theatre of Operation, as a pilot. He completed a total of 30
combat missions and participated in the Ardennes and Germany campaigns.
His DD Form 214, issued in conjunction with his 1 Dec 62 retirement from
active duty, reflects that he was awarded the AM, with five OLCs.
On 14 September 2000, his record was administratively corrected to reflect
award of the European-African-Middle Eastern Campaign Medal, with 3 bronze
service star (EAME, w/3BSS), American Campaign Medal, w/1BSS, the
Distinguished Unit Citation, and the World War II Victory Medal.
On 26 June 2003, his record was administratively corrected awarding him the
Distinguished Flying Cross for heroism while participating in aerial flight
during the period of 22 January 1945.
The DFC was established by Congress on 2 July 1926 and is awarded for
heroism or extraordinary achievement while participating in aerial flight.
The performance of the act of heroism must be evidenced by voluntary action
above and beyond the call of duty.
The AM is awarded for heroic or meritorious achievement while participating
in aerial flight.
During World War II, the 8th Air Force had an established policy whereby a
DFC was awarded upon the completion of tour of combat duty, and an AM was
awarded upon the completion of every five heavy bomber missions. In 1942,
the length of a tour was the completion of 25 combat missions. In 1944,
the tour length was increased to 35 combat missions, and the number of
combat missions required for award of an additional AM was increased to
six.
In 1943, General “Hap” Arnold ordered theater commanders not to award the
AM or DFC based solely on the number of combat missions completed, but
rather for acts of heroism in combat flight or extraordinary achievement
while participating in aerial flight. However, it appears the policy of
automatically awarding the DFC and AM based solely on the number of
missions completed was not discontinued until 1946.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPPR recommends the application be denied, and states, in part, that
based on the applicant’s record and provided documentation, they were able
to verify the applicant’s entitlement to the AM, 5OLCs; however, no
official documentation was provided or located that verifies his
entitlement to the AM, w/6OLC.
The HQ AFPC/DPSIDR complete evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Through his member of congress, the applicant states the evaluation
contained many errors and/or omission of facts. Additionally, he provides
a list of 35 missions he flew which he believes entitles him to the AM,
6OLC, and a copy of his retirement order.
The applicant’s complete response, with attachments, is at Exhibit E.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of
justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice warranting award of an additional AM. In
this respect, the available evidence of record reflects the applicant
completed a total of 35 combat missions while assigned to the Eighth Air
Force as a B-17 pilot. During the contested period, Eighth Air Force had
an established policy whereby an AM was awarded upon the completion of
every five heavy bombardment missions. In support of the appeal, the
applicant has provided copies of orders and flight records validating his
completion of 35 combat missions. Based on the evidence presented, we are
convinced the applicant should be entitled to the AM, 6OLCs. In view of
the above, and given the total number of missions the applicant completed,
we believe he should be awarded an additional AM. Therefore, we recommend
his records be corrected to the extent indicated below.
4. Additionally, the Board notes that on 26 June 2003, the applicant’s
records were administratively corrected awarding him the DFC.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating
to APPLICANT be corrected to show that on 11 March 1945, he was awarded the
Air Medal, Sixth Oak Leaf Cluster, for extraordinary achievement, while
serving as a Pilot on B-17 airplanes on many bombardment missions over
enemy occupied Continental Europe.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2009-00219
in Executive Session on 11 June 2009, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Michael K. Gallogly, Panel Chair
Ms. Martha J. Evans, Member
Mr. James W. Russell, III, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The following
documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 14 Jan 09, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPSIDR, dated 25 Feb 09.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 6 Mar 09.
Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant’s Member of Congress, dated
23 Mar 09, w/atchs.
MICHAEL K. GALLOGLY
Panel Chair
AFBCMR BC-2009-00219
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force
Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section
1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to XXXXXXX, XXXXXXX, be corrected to show that on 11 March 1945,
he was awarded the Air Medal, Sixth Oak Leaf Cluster, for extraordinary
achievement, while serving as a Pilot on B-17 airplanes on many bombardment
missions over enemy occupied Continental Europe.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00386
AFPC/DPPPR states, in part, that although the applicant’s records indicate that he completed a total of 35 combat missions and he has submitted a DFC recommendation signed by his former commander, in 1946, General “Hap” Arnold ordered theater commanders not to award the AM or DFC based solely on the number of combat missions completed, but rather for acts of heroism in combat flight or extraordinary achievement while participating in aerial flight. Applicant’s records do not indicate he was...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00916
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-00916 INDEX NUMBER: 107.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: ROBERT L. ASTON XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross (DFC) and Fifth and Sixth Oak Leaf Clusters to the Air Medal (AM, 5 & 6 OLCs). In 2001, the AFBCMR awarded a DFC and additional AMs to an applicant who had...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00538
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-00538 INDEX NUMBER: 107.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: ROBERT L. ASTON XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 20 Aug 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded three additional oak leaf clusters to the Air Medal (AM). _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01247
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-01247 INDEX CODE: 107.00 XXXXXX (DECEASED) COUNSEL: DR ASTON HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 27 OCT 2007 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her deceased husband’s records be corrected to show he was awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross (DFC) and awarded the Air Medal (AM) with five Oak Leaf Clusters...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00420
_________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: In view of his completion of a total of 37 combat missions and based on the Eighth Air Force established policy of awarding an AM upon the completion of every five heavy bomber missions and awarding a DFC upon the completion of 35 combat missions, he should be awarded the DFC and an additional AM. In view of the above, and since the applicant never received a DFC for his completion of a combat...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-02179
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-02179 INDEX NUMBER: 107.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: ROBERT L. ASTON XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 12 Jan 07 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross (DFC) and two additional oak leaf clusters to the Air Medal (AM). In addition, based on the Eighth Air Force policy...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | bc-2004-00787
Under the revised policy, the DFC could be awarded for acts of heroism in combat flight or extraordinary achievement while participating in aerial flight (Exhibit C). _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Counsel for applicant states, among other things, that the requested relief should be favorably considered based on the recommendation of the applicant’s former commanding officer and in view of the established...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03794
In BC-2004-02294, the AFBCMR awarded a DFC to an applicant who had also completed more than the required ten missions as a lead navigator and an additional oak leaf cluster for completion of a tour of 32 combat missions. AFPC/DPPPR states, in part, that although the applicant’s records indicate that he completed a total of 35 combat missions and he has submitted a DFC recommendation signed by his former commander, in 1946, General “Hap” Arnold ordered theater commanders not to award the AM...
He be promoted to the grade of captain in 1945 upon separation from active duty or in 1950 after serving an additional five years in the Reserve. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He should have been awarded a DFC since he and the pilot were recommended at the same time and for the same mission and the pilot received his DFC; or in the alternative, he should be awarded the DFC based on the completion of 35 combat missions. A complete...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01548
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-01548 INDEX NUMBER: 107.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: ROBERT L. ASTON HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 13 November 2008 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded two oak leaf clusters to the Distinguished Flying Cross (DFC) and three additional oak leaf clusters to the Air Medal (AM). In view of the above,...