RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-02069
INDEX NUMBER: 107.00
XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His records be corrected to reflect award of the Air Medal.
_________________________________________________________________
THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
Based on his service during the period of 1 April 1964 through 20 March
1966, he was awarded the Air Medal. In spite of having the certificate and
citation for the award in his possession, it was never reflected in his
military personnel records. He can obtain sworn statements from six or
more former members who served with him during this period.
In support of the appeal, applicant submits a personal statement and a copy
of the certificate and citation for the AM.
The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 12 June 1962 for a
period of four years. He was progressively promoted to the rank of airman
first class (A1C/E-4) with a date of rank of 1 October 1965. He served as
a Voice Interceptor Operator Specialist, with an assignment with the Air
Force Security Services. He successfully completed the Russian Language
Course and a tour in Germany from 27 March 1964 until his discharge. His
Enlisted Record and Report of Separation, issued in conjunction with his 24
March 1966 release from active duty, reflects that he was awarded the Air
Force Good Conduct Medal.
The Air Medal is awarded to U.S. and civilian personnel for single acts of
heroism or meritorious achievements while participating in aerial flight
and foreign military personnel in actual combat in support of operations.
Required achievement is less than that required for the Distinguished
Flying Cross, but must be accomplished with distinction above and beyond
that expected of professional airmen. It is not awarded for peace time
sustained operational activities and flights.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial, stating, in part, they informed the
applicant of what document (special order) was needed to validate his AM
certificate and citation. However, he did not provide the special order.
They were unable to verify the applicant’s entitlement to the requested
award without the special order.
The HQ AFPC/DPSIDR complete evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 16
September 2008 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, no
response has been received by this office (Exhibit D).
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of
justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant's
complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree
with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary
responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that
the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore,
should the applicant provide additional documentation, to include a copy of
the special order or statements from his former commander and supervisor to
substantiate his claim, we would be inclined to reconsider his request for
award of the AM. In view of the above, and in the absence of evidence to
the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in
this application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not
considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2008-02069
in Executive Session on 11 June 2009, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Michael K. Gallogly, Panel Chair
Ms. Martha J. Evans, Member
Mr. James W. Russell III, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 27 May 08, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPSIDR, 16 Sep 08.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 26 Sep 08.
MICHAEL K. GALLOGLY
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-04145
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-04145 INDEX NUMBER: 107.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His WG AGO Form 53-55, Enlisted Record and Report of Separation, issued in conjunction with his honorable discharge on 29 November 1945, reflect his Air Medal that he was previously awarded. The applicant’s WG AGO 53-55...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-04138
_________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Based on the Eighth Air Force established policy of awarding a DFC upon the completion of 35 combat missions, he is entitled to the award. Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. No official documentation was provided or located that verifies the DFC being awarded to the applicant; or a written recommendation submitted requesting consideration for the DFC.
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-00219
In 1943, General “Hap” Arnold ordered theater commanders not to award the AM or DFC based solely on the number of combat missions completed, but rather for acts of heroism in combat flight or extraordinary achievement while participating in aerial flight. In this respect, the available evidence of record reflects the applicant completed a total of 35 combat missions while assigned to the Eighth Air Force as a B-17 pilot. Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant’s Member of Congress, dated 23 Mar 09, w/atchs.
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-04104
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-04104 INDEX NUMBER: 107.00 XXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her late father’s records be corrected to reflect award of the Distinguished Flying Cross (DFC). Although the Secretary of the Air Force Personnel Council (SAFPC) Awards and Decorations Board could not process the...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-03475
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial of the applicant's request for the AFGCM. Other than his own assertions, the applicant has provided no documentary evidence that would establish his entitlement to the...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-00460
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: After separating from the Air Force he was not issued a DD Form 214. After a thorough review of the available evidence and the applicant’s complete submission, we find no evidence which would persuade us that his records should be corrected to show he was awarded the SAEMR. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 7 March 2008.
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-01480
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-01480 INDEX CODE: 107.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214 be corrected to reflect award of the Air Force Combat Action Medal (AFCAM). ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIDR was advised on 20 November 2007...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-02399
It also recognizes single acts of merit or meritorious service if the achievement or service is of a lesser degree than that deemed worthy of the Legion of Merit; but such service must have been accomplished with distinction. The timeline for submitting a decoration is two years from the date of the act or achievement. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02560
After a through review of the applicant's military record, DPSIDR was unable to locate documentation which verified he was qualified or awarded the SAEMR. Other than his own assertions, the applicant has provided no documentary evidence that would establish his entitlement to the Small Arms Expert Marksmanship Ribbon with Bronze Service Star; therefore, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-03898
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial, noting there are no special order, recommendation, proposed citation, or any other evidence provided by the applicant or located within his limited official military personnel file to support that he was submitted for the AM. All military decorations require a recommendation from a recommending official within the member’s chain of command at the time of the act or...