Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-01212
Original file (BC-2008-01212.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2008-01012
            INDEX CODE:  108.07
            COUNSEL:  NONE
            HEARING DESIRED:  YES

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His residuals of frostbite be reevaluated  as  combat-related  in  order  to
qualify for compensation  under  the  Combat  Related  Special  Compensation
(CRSC) Act.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He developed frostbite while participating in  field  living  conditions  in
preparation for an assignment to Germany.

In support of his request, he provided  documentation  associated  with  his
CRSC application.

Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

On 17 Dec 80,  the  applicant  contracted  his  initial  enlistment  in  the
Regular Air Force.  He was progressively promoted to  the  grade  of  master
sergeant having assumed the grade effective and with a date  of  rank  of  1
Feb 00.  He was honorably retired on 1 Nov 02.

Available Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) records  reflect  a  combined
compensable rating of 40% for his unfitting conditions.

The applicant submitted an application for  CRSC  for  traumatic  arthritis,
hallux  valgus,  lumborsacral  and  cervical   strains,   hemorrhoids,   and
residuals of frostbite.  On 30 Oct 07, his claim was disapproved because  no
evidence was submitted to substantiate his claim that  his  conditions  were
the direct result of armed conflict, hazardous service,  instrumentality  of
war, or simulating war.  Service connection for his residuals  of  frostbite
was denied by the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA).

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPPD recommends denial.  DPPD states there is no evidence  to  indicate
his residuals of frostbite was directly caused by armed conflict,  hazardous
service, instrumentality of war, or simulating war.  His  medical  condition
does not meet  the  mandatory  criteria  for  compensation  under  the  CRSC
program.

APFC/DPPD’s complete evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 20 Jun
08, for review and response within 30 days.  As of this date,  no  response
has been received by this office.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided  by  existing  law  or
regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been  presented  to  demonstrate  the
existence of error or injustice.  The available evidence of record does  not
support  a  finding  that  the  service-connected  medical   condition   the
applicant believes is combat-related was incurred as the  direct  result  of
armed conflict, while engaged in hazardous service, in  the  performance  of
duty under conditions simulating war, or through an instrumentality of  war;
and, therefore, does not qualify for compensation under the  CRSC  Act.   We
agree with the opinion  and  recommendation  of  the  Air  Force  office  of
primary responsibility  and  adopt  its  rationale  as  the  basis  for  our
conclusion that the applicant has  not  been  the  victim  of  an  error  or
injustice.  In  the  absence  of  evidence  to  the  contrary,  we  find  no
compelling  basis  to  recommend  granting  the  relief   sought   in   this
application.

4.  The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not been shown
that a personal appearance with or without counsel will materially  add  to
our understanding of the issues involved.  Therefore,  the  request  for  a
hearing is not favorably considered.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented  did  not  demonstrate
the existence of an error or injustice; the application was  denied  without
a personal appearance; and the application will only  be  reconsidered  upon
the submission of newly discovered relevant  evidence  not  considered  with
this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number  BC-2008-
01012 in Executive Session on 19 Aug 08, under the  provisions  of  AFI  36-
2603:

                 Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Chair
                 Mr. Michael V. Barbino, Member
                 Mr. Alan A. Blomgren, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 10 Mar 08, w/atchs.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPPD, dated 27 May 08, w/atch.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 20 Jun 08.




                                        THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
                                        Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-00813

    Original file (BC-2008-00813.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-00813 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected disability of sleep apnea syndrome be reevaluated as combat-related in order to qualify for compensation under the Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC) Act. On 16 Jul 07, his claim was disapproved due to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-01009

    Original file (BC-2008-01009.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    For hypertension to qualify for CRSC, it must be secondary to diabetes mellitus contracted due to exposure to Agent Orange or presumptive to prisoner of war internment, and this must be stated in the applicable Veterans Affairs (VA) Rating Decision. The DVA rating decision dated 6 Aug 85 notes he received medication for hypertension in 1981 and the rating decision dated 25 Jun 07 reflects he was diagnosed with diabetes mellitus in November 2006. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-00724

    Original file (BC-2008-00724.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The DVA office has admitted making an error in the rating and effective date of his service-connected medical condition. Available DVA records reflect a combined compensable rating of 40% for his unfitting conditions. With respect to the portion of his request regarding the increased DVA disability rating; since we have determined that his knee disabilities are not combat-related, a correction to his...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-02056

    Original file (BC-2008-02056.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-02056 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical condition, migraine headaches, be reevaluated as combat-related in order to qualify for compensation under the Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC) Act. He submitted a application for...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-01969

    Original file (BC-2004-01969.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his request, applicant provided documentation associated with his CRSC application an aircraft loss record, and witness statements. He served 21 years, 2 months, and 19 days on active duty Available Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) records reflect a combined compensable rating of 80% for his unfitting conditions. DPPD states a review of his service and DVA medical records show his post-op residuals, left knee, has not been rated by the DVA as service connected.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03676

    Original file (BC-2006-03676.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    A review of the records provided by the applicant show no cause for the hypothyroidism. After a thorough review of the available evidence of record, it is our opinion that the service-connected medical condition the applicant believes is combat-related was not incurred as the direct result of armed conflict, while engaged in hazardous service, in the performance of duty under conditions simulating war, or through an instrumentality of war, and therefore, does not qualify for...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-03916

    Original file (BC-2008-03916.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    His DVA award was 50 percent, his CRSC award was 40 percent with Special Monthly Compensation. In this respect, it appears that while the DVA increased his combined service-connected disability rating to 50 percent, the particular disability that has been determined combat-related remains rated at 40 percent. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-01938

    Original file (BC-2008-01938.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-01938 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical condition, invertebral disc syndrome be reevaluated as combat-related in order to qualify for compensation under the Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC) Act. His medical records reflect he hurt...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01088

    Original file (BC-2006-01088.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Available Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) records reflect a combined compensable rating of 20% for his unfitting conditions. DPPD states the applicant initially requested review of his service-connected disabilities of back strain, degenerative arthritis of the hands and knees, and bursitis of the shoulder. We agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-01224

    Original file (BC-2008-01224.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-01224 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical condition of intervertebral disc syndrome be reevaluated as combat-related in order to qualify for compensation under the Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC) Act. His medical records reflect he...