RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-00537
INDEX CODE: 110.00
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 2Q (Medically Retired or
Discharged) be changed to a code that would allow him to enlist in the
Army.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He suffered a mental breakdown and depression because of marital problems.
After drinking and taking sleeping pills, he woke up in a hospital. Tests
and exams were performed and his medication was changed. He was restricted
from working on the flight line. He felt alienated, ridiculed and received
childlike treatment from his friends and coworkers. He was constantly
reprimanded by his supervisors. When asked by the medical board if he
wanted to be released from military service, he felt it was his only
choice.
He now has a decent job, a nice apartment and a beautiful fiancé. His
prior military training would make him a great asset to the Army. He has
never felt better and is fit for duty.
In support of the application, he submits his personal statement, copies of
his DD Form 293, Application for the Review of Discharge from the Armed
Forces of the United States, his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or
Discharge from Active Duty, his AF Form 618, Medical Board Report, his AF
Form 1185, Statement of Record Data, and his Physician's Addendum to the
Assessment, dated 6 Apr 08.
The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 20 Aug 04, the applicant was honorably discharged and released from
military service for disability with severance pay. He had served 9 years,
1 month and 2 days on active duty, to include 3 years, 10 months and 21
days of foreign service.
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from
the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letters prepared by
the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C and E.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ AFPC/DPSD recommends denial. DPSD states the applicant concurred with
the findings of the IPEB.
The complete DPSD evaluation is at Exhibit C.
The BCMR Medical Consultant recommends denial. Applicant met a Medical
Evaluation Board (MEB) on 6 Apr 04. Results of the MEB reflect the
applicant’s initial self-referral to the Life Skills Support Center on 9
May 03 following his return from a 4-month deployment to Saudi Arabia. He
had reportedly been prescribed an anti-depressant and a sleep aid by his
primary care manager. He reported experiencing a 2-year history of
“worsening” depressed mood, decreased interest, social withdrawal, guilt,
poor concentration, low self-esteem, and thoughts of death, among other
symptoms. He also described a “similar episode” approximately five years
prior associated with “worries” regarding his marriage and work
performance. He has been twice divorced and currently resides with his
fiancée. A significant aspect of his clinical history relates to his
attempted suicide on 31 May 03 by taking “one to two bottles” of Tylenol PM
along with alcohol following an argument with his spouse. He also
described a previous suicide attempt, via an overdose, five to six years
before for which he reportedly did not receive any medical or psychiatric
treatment. A report of his more recent suicide attempt of record
highlighted his compliance and positive response to treatment during a
period of inpatient and outpatient follow-up care. However, he continued
to carry a restrictive duty profile prohibiting both his deployability and
further work on the flight line. Although the evaluating psychiatrist
opined that he “would be fully deployable” if cross-trained into an
alternate career field, his commanding officer took the position that his
medical condition “[was] not compatible with military service.”
The applicant submitted an “addendum” assessment conducted on 4 Aug 06 by a
civilian psychiatrist, reportedly for the purpose of obtaining a medical
clearance to enter the US Army. The evaluating psychiatrist found “no
active diagnosis” and expressed the view that the applicant had no
psychopathology that would interfere with a “regular profession or job,
including service in the US Army.”
The Medical Consultant opines the applicant remains at risk for an acute
exacerbation or recurrence of his illness upon re-exposure to the stressors
associated with military service, to include those associated with fighting
wars and training for war.
The BCMR Medical Consultant’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit D.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 28
Mar 08 and 25 Jul 08, respectively, for review and comment within 30 days.
As of this date, this office has received no response (Exhibit E).
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of
justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant's
complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree
with the opinion and recommendation of the BCMR Medical Consultant and
adopt his rationale as the basis for the conclusion that the applicant has
not been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the absence of
evidence to the contrary, we find no compelling basis to recommend granting
the relief sought in this application.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not
considered with this application.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive
Session on 9 Sep 08, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. James W. Russell, III, Panel Chair
Ms. Jan Mulligan, Member
Ms. Lea Gallogly, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered in AFBCMR BC-2008-00537:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 16 Oct 08 [sic], w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant’s Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPSD, dated 21 Feb 08.
Exhibit D. Letter, BCMR Medical Consultant, dated 24 Jul 08.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 28 Mar 08.
JAMES W. RUSSELL, III
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-04050
She requested a medical separation; however, the Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) stated her medical conditions were “pre-existing". The Medical Consultant states the record reflects that the applicant has experienced depression and anxiety since the age of 13. The applicant was discharged from the Air Force due to a medical condition that was determined to have existed prior to entering military service.
AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD 2014 02036
SEPARATION DATE: 20040423 Depressive Disorder Condition . I have carefully reviewed the evidence of record and the recommendation of the Board.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01981
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-01981 INDEX CODE: 100.03, 100.06 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed. The Medical Consultant evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPAE reviewed applicant’s request and recommends denial. Additionally, she provided no facts warranting a change...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04514
The IPEB reviewed his case and found the applicant unfit for continued military and recommended discharge with severance pay with a disability rating of 10 percent for a diagnosis of Anxiety Disorder, NOS. The complete DPSD evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: He does not understand how his PTSD diagnosis would be blatantly ignored when two separate professional mental health...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01334
DPPD states that his medical records show he was treated for various conditions while on active duty, however, none were identified to be serious or life threatening enough to require referral through the Air Force military disability evaluation system. The DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Counsel states that the focus of the applicant's contention is that his current diagnosis of...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03480
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant opines no change in the records is warranted. The complete BCMR Medical Consultant evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03087
The OSA has responded well to CPAP. On 4 June 2010, the applicant non-concurred with the IPEB findings and requested a formal hearing with counsel, contending she was unfit for duty and should receive a 30 percent disability rating for her Depression with Anxiety and another 30 percent for migraine headaches for a combined disability rating of 50 percent and a permanent retirement. The FPEB considered her OSA as a condition that could be unfitting but was not currently compensable or...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02626
There is no documentation that reflects further evaluation of this history at the time of her enlistment. The applicant states that it was her depression resulting from the death of her 87 year-old father, in July 1996, and from mistreatment at work by her supervisors that caused her to abuse alcohol and hallucinogenic mushrooms. An April 1995 emergency room entry reported use of alcohol on the day of the incident leading to her emergency care.
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-01816
The FPEB recommended permanent disability retirement with a 10% disability rating. The BCMR Medical Consultant’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit F. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS: In response to the AFPC/DPSD evaluation, counsel responds that the applicant’s rating has to be based on the rating criteria, in other words, the DVA rating chart, rather than pulling a percentage of out thin air and applying it to...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-00904
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00904 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His discharge be upgraded from general to honorable and the narrative reason be changed to medical reasons. There is no evidence that the history, symptoms and signs as recorded in his medical records at that time are in error. This...