RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-00485
INDEX CODE: 128.05
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: YES
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
He be paid his Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) according to his written
contract.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
At the time of his reenlistment and subsequent retraining into Air Force
Specialty Code (AFSC) 1N335A (Arabic Linguist), he was told his
reenlistment bonus would be paid upon his successful completion of
technical school and his arrival at his next permanent duty station.
However, after meeting the requirements of his contract and submitting his
request for the bonus through his Military Personnel Flight (MPF), the Air
Force Personnel Center (AFPC) denied his request and would not honor his
contract citing that in accordance with Air Force Instruction 36-2606, he
was not entitled to receive a bonus even though his contract stated he was.
He should receive the SRB indicated in his reenlistment contract even
though the Air Force is denying payment due to their administrative error.
He has fulfilled every bit of his part of the contract by working and
serving his country for every day of that contract. Had he known the Air
Force was not going to uphold their part of the contract, he would not have
reenlisted for the additional six years required. If his contract is
deemed invalid, not only will he lose the over $50,000 promised, he will
also be ineligible for a Zone A SRB upon his next reenlistment, which means
he will lose even more bonus money.
In support of his appeal, the applicant submits a personal statement, and
copies of the electronic notification of his ineligibility for the SRB, and
his reenlistment contract.
The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
According to the Military Personnel Data System, the applicant is currently
serving on active duty in the grade of staff sergeant (E-5) with a date of
rank of 1 August 2006. He has a Total Active Federal Military Service Date
of 2 January 2002 and a projected Date of Separation of 26 July 2011.
On 27 December 2005, he reenlisted for a period of five years and seven
months. At the time of his reenlistment, he held the AFSC 1N255
(Cryptologic Linguist). His Air Force IMT 901, Reenlistment Eligibility
Annex to DD Form 4, indicates he was approved for retraining into AFSC
1N315A and that he would be paid a Zone A, Multiple 5 bonus based on five
years and 7 months of continued service.
Upon completion of technical school and arrival at his next permanent duty
station, the applicant applied for his SRB through his MPF. According to
an electronic transmission dated 9 January 2008, AFPC denied the
applicant’s SRB citing he was not entitled at the time of his reenlistment.
AFPC stated in the message that even though the AFSC the applicant was
retraining into (1N3X5A) was on the 23 April 2005 SRB listing, the AFSC
(1N251) he held at the time he reenlisted was not. Therefore, in order for
him to qualify for the bonus, he would have to have held the 1N3X5A AFSC at
the time he reenlisted.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSOA recommends the applicant’s request be denied; however,
recommends the Board direct the applicant’s AF IMT 901 form be
administratively corrected. DPSOA states the contract was an
administrative error and must be corrected. The applicant reenlisted while
in the 1N2X1 AFSC which, at the time, was not on the SRB listing. He has
not received any payment and has not been negatively affected by the error;
therefore, it should be corrected. Integrity clearly mandates the
applicant acknowledge the error as it is.
The DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit B.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The basis for his request is not only the fact he was instructed that he
was eligible for the retraining SRB, it is also the fact that his
reenlistment contract clearly states that he would be receiving an SRB. He
signed the contract as did the MPF representative and the section
commander. The contract took two weeks to complete and was confirmed by
the MPF and his squadron commander. These Air Force personnel were
responsible for ensuring his contract was not in error. If his contract is
found to be invalid, he will lose the money which he had been expecting and
had plans for, not to mention the money he could have made in the private
sector by not reenlisting for six years – a significant opportunity lost.
Many people read his contract and two additional people signed it;
therefore, to use “administrative error” is a poor excuse. The Air Force
has an obligation to fulfill his contract by paying the bonus that was
originally promised.
The applicant’s rebuttal is at Exhibit D.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of an error or injustice. Based on the evidence of record, it
appears the applicant was miscounseled by MPF representatives and that his
reenlistment contract was erroneously prepared, indicating he would be
entitled to an SRB based on five years and seven months of continued
service, upon completion of technical school, and arrival at his next
permanent duty station. In our opinion, he contracted his reenlistment in
the Air Force in good faith and the error in this case appears to have been
made by MPF representatives. We believe it would be an injustice for him
to suffer the consequences of a contractual error, over which he had no
control. We note the rationale provided by the Air Force advisory opinion;
however, it is our opinion that the applicant should not be penalized
because of this error. In view of the foregoing, and to preclude any
further injustice to the applicant, we believe any doubt in this matter
should be resolved in his favor. Accordingly, in order to effect the relief
he is seeking, we recommend his records be corrected as indicated below.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating
to APPLICANT be corrected to show that at the time of his reenlistment in
the Regular Air Force on 27 December 2005, for a period of five (5) years
and seven (7) months, competent authority approved his entitlement to a
Zone A, Multiple 5, Selective Reenlistment Bonus as an exception to policy.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive
Session on 29 May 2008, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Wayne R. Gracie, Panel Chair
Mr. Vance E. Lineberger, Member
Mr. Garry G. Sauner, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The following
documentary evidence for AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2008-00485 was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 28 Jan 08, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 28 Feb 08.
Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 4 Apr 08.
Exhibit D. Applicant’s Rebuttal, dated 17 Apr 08.
WAYNE R. GRACIE
Panel Chair
AFBCMR BC-2008-00485
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force
Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section
1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, be corrected to show that at the time
of his reenlistment in the Regular Air Force on 27 December 2005, for a
period of five (5) years and seven (7) months, competent authority approved
his entitlement to a Zone A, Multiple 5, Selective Reenlistment Bonus as an
exception to policy.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03802
According to AF Form 1411, Extension or Cancellation of Extension of Enlistment in the Regular Air Force, on 17 Mar 04, the applicant extended his 3 May 00 enlistment for 18 months for the purpose of having sufficient retainability for Career Airmen Reenlistment Reservation System (CAREERS) retraining into Air Field Management (AFSC 1C7X1). As pointed out by HQ USAF/JAA, the applicant is “better off” with the existing 17-month extension plus a four-year reenlistment, with a four-year SRB,...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02904
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-02904 INDEX CODE: 128.05 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment contract be changed to reflect the 1A131, Flight Engineer Air Force Specialty Code (AFSC) so he can qualify for a Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB). To meet retainability requirements and complete the...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03878
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The Air Force admitted to making a mistake on his reenlistment contract; they reflected an SRB multiplier of 5.0 in Section III, Item D, of his Air Force IMT 901, Reenlistment Eligibility Annex to DD Form 4. On 1 September 2011, over four years after his contract was signed and approved, he was notified by his Support Squadron Reenlistments office that his contract was in error and that it was changed...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01199
AFI 36-2626, Airman Retraining Program, Attachment 8, SRB Provisions for Retraining, requires the enlistee to acknowledge understanding that if he retrains from a non-SRB skill to an SRB skill or vice-versa, he would not receive an SRB if he reenlists to obtain the retraining retainability, and if he remains eligible to reenlist, he is entitled to the SRB multiple level in effect when final approval is received. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03595
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-03595 INDEX CODE: 128.05 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: May 25, 2008 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to show he reenlisted into the 1N531 (intelligence) Air Force Specialty Code (AFSC) instead of the 3P071 (security forces) AFSC. AFPC Reenlistments advised the...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01813
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01813 INDEX CODE: 128.05, 112.05 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 11 Dec 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) be paid based on the full four years she reenlisted for on 23 Dec 04 and not be reduced by the time remaining on the 23-month extension she was...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00708
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His reenlistment date needs to be changed to allow him to meet the requirement for the Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) Zone A and to be within 30 days of his retraining technical school Class Graduation Date (CGD). On 13 Dec 13, DFAS notified him that he should have been allowed to reenlist within the 30 day window (even though his AFSC/CJR was not updated) with a 2.0 multiplier. He was further advised that DFAS could only remit the debt and to file BCMR to have...
Based on input from the Retraining Section at AFMPC, the applicant received approved CAREERS retraining into AFSC 115x0 (which was authorized a Zone A, Multiple One-Half SRB) on 4 February 1993, prior to his reenlistment in AFSC 361x1. DPMAPE recommended denial of the applicant's request to have the recouped SRB reinstated. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit E).
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02964
Recoupment of the unearned portion of the applicant’s SRB should not be recouped, as she was removed due to medical reason. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOA evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation, with attachments, was forwarded to applicant on 15 Feb 08 for review and response within 30 days. Accordingly, we recommend her records be...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05612
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. However, that extension or reenlistment in Aug 2012 still would not have made the applicant eligible for the SRB because member's have to be a 3-skill level in the SRB career field at the time...