RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-03878
INDEX CODE: 112.00
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His reentry code of "2X - First-term, second-term, or career airman
considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective
Reenlistment Program (SRP)" be changed to a code that would allow him to
reenlist.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He has nearly 10 years of distinguished service. His military records are
pristine, excluding the blemishes received at his last command, which he
feels were wrongfully warranted by his supervisor and commander. His
appeal for nonselection of reenlistment was denied. He believes it is
unjust that an unfortunate experience at a single command should end the
career he has devoted so much of his time and effort to.
In support of his request, the applicant provided documentation extracted
from his military personnel record.
Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant with four years of prior active service in the Navy, entered
active duty in the Regular Air Force on 26 February 2001.
The applicant was honorably discharged on 25 September 2006, in the grade
of staff sergeant. He served 5 years and 7 months on active duty. He
received a reentry code of 2X.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial. DPSOA states although there is no
documentation remaining in the applicant's records surrounding his denial
of reenlistment, the applicant clearly confirms he was denied reenlistment
by his commander. Commanders make selection or non-selection based on
Enlisted Performance Reports (EPRs), unfavorable information from any
substantiated source, the airman's willingness to comply with Air Force
standards, and the airman's ability (or lack of) to meet required training
and duty performance levels.
The applicant's commander as the authority on recommendations for
reenlistment or non-reenlistment of squadron members, recommended non-
reenlistment of the applicant. Partial documentation submitted by the
applicant, along with his statement confirms he was denied reenlistment.
Finally, documentation from the Military Personnel Flight (MPF) on
Separating or Retiring Personnel and the Records review printout, dated 2
September 2006 confirms the applicant was denied reenlistment.
AFPC/DPSOA’s complete evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
On 29 February 2008, the evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for
review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). As of this date, this
office has received no response.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of an error or an injustice. After a thorough review of the
evidence of record and the applicant’s submission, it is our opinion that
given the circumstances surrounding his separation from the Air Force, the
reentry code assigned was proper and in compliance with the appropriate
directives. The applicant has not provided any evidence which would lead
us to believe otherwise. Therefore, we agree with the opinion and
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt
its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not
been the victim of an error or injustice. In the absence of evidence to
the contrary, we find no compelling basis to recommend granting the relief
sought.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the
existence of an error or injustice; the application was denied without a
personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2007-
03878 in Executive Session on 8 April 2008, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Ms. Rita S. Looney, Panel Chair
Ms. Karen A. Holloman, Member
Mr. Garry G. Sauner, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 8 October 2007, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 10 December 2007,
w/atchs.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBC, dated 29 February 2008.
RITA S. LOONEY
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-01993
On 12 February 2007, the applicant's supervisor initiated an AF Form 418, Selective Reenlistment Program Consideration, and non-recommended him for reenlistment. DPSOA found no evidence of error or injustice. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03414
________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial stating, in part, the applicant did not provide any evidence of an error or injustice that would warrant a change of his RE code. At the time members are separated from the Air Force, they are furnished an RE code predicated upon the quality of their service and the circumstances of their separation. ________________________________________________________________ The...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02848
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-02848 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) code of 2X (first-term, second term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP)) be upgraded so that he can reenlist in the US Marine Corps (USMC). ...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01711
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01711 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 2X (First-term, second term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the SRP) be changed to a code that would allow him to reenlist. In support of his request, the applicant provides a letter...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-00553
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She voluntarily separated from the military under the Date of Separation (DOS) Rollback Program and received an honorable discharge. Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 11 April 2008. The Air Force office of primary responsibility (AFPC/DPSOA) notes that AFI 36-2606, Reenlistment in the United States Air Force, provides commanders Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP) selection or nonselection...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05487
Block 8b, Station Where Separated, of his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect Andrews Air Force Base, Maryland, instead of Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 1. The applicants commander indicated the applicant identified himself as eligible for separation under the DOS Rollback program and it was his intention to deny the applicant reenlistment...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-03383
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-03383 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 2X (First-term, second term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP) be changed in a manner to allow him to enter the Air National Guard. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02391
On 7 September 2010, he was notified that his supervisor not recommended him for reenlistment. The applicant was discharged on 31 May 2011 under the FY11 Air Force Shaping Rollback Program after serving 3 years, 9 months and 3 days. The applicant provides no proof of an error or injustice in reference to his RE code and his non-selection for reenlistment was in accordance with current guidance.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01132
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01132 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry code of 2X (First-term, second term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP)) be changed to a code that would allow him to reenlist. On 1 March 2006, the applicant was...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03037
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03037 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code 2X First-term, second term, or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP) be changed to allow reentry in the military. We took notice of the applicant's complete...