Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-03041
Original file (BC-2007-03041.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-03041

            COUNSEL: NONE

            HEARING DESIRED:  YES

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His under  honorable  conditions  (general)  discharge  be  upgraded  to  an
honorable discharge.
_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

The  Gas  Chromatography/Mass  Spectrometry  was  faulty  at  the  time  his
specimen was processed.  After  his  first  urine  test  he  did  not  smoke
marijuana again.  The Civil Liberties Union proved  the  capillary  tube  in
the test equipment was subject to contamination  from  prior  samples.   His
sample was contaminated by the marijuana from prior samples.

Applicant's complete submission is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 28 Sep 81, as  an  airman
basic for a period of six years.

On  23  Apr  84,  the  applicant’s  commander  notified  him  that  he   was
recommending his discharge from the Air Force  for  failure  in  Drug  Abuse
Rehabilitation.  The specific reasons for the discharge action were:

      a.    On 24 Jun 83,  he  was  entered  into  the  drug  rehabilitation
program because his urine sample he submitted on 21 Apr 83  tested  positive
for marijuana.

      b.    On 27 Jun 83, he was reprimanded for drug use.

      c.    On 20 Oct 83, he was placed on the follow-on  support  phase  of
the drug rehabilitation program.

      d.    On 26 Oct 83, he submitted another  urine  sample  which  tested
positive for marijuana.

      e.    The random urine samples submitted  on  11  Jan  and  2  Feb  84
tested positive for marijuana.

The commander advised the applicant of his rights in this matter.

On 23 Apr 84, he waived his right to consult counsel and  submit  statements
in his own behalf.

On 18 May 84, the discharge authority directed the applicant  be  discharged
with a general discharge.

On 23 May 84, the applicant was discharged.  He served a total  of  2 years,
3 months and 15 days on active duty.

Pursuant to  the  Board’s  request,  the  Federal  Bureau  of  Investigation
provided an investigative report which is attached at Exhibit C.  On  1  Nov
07, the Board staff forwarded the applicant a copy of  the  FBI  report  for
review and comment within 30 days and  requested  he  provide  documentation
pertaining to his activities since leaving  military  service  (Exhibit  D).
As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit E).

In a letter, dated 16 Nov 07, the applicant stated  he  ceased  using  drugs
after his first drug analysis.  He decided his  Air  Force  career  was  too
important to himself and his country to continue using drugs.  Any  positive
tests afterwards, had to be contaminated from prior samples.

_________________________________________________________________

FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS OF THE BOARD:

1.    After careful consideration of applicant’s request and  the  available
evidence of record, we find the application  untimely.   Applicant  did  not
file within three years after the alleged error or injustice was  discovered
as required by Title 10, United States Code,  Section  1552  and  Air  Force
Instruction 36-2603.  Applicant has not shown a  plausible  reason  for  the
delay in filing, and we are not persuaded that the record raises  issues  of
error or injustice which require resolution on the merits.  Thus, we  cannot
conclude it would be in  the  interest  of  justice  to  excuse  applicant’s
failure to  file  in  a  timely  manner  and  agree  with  the  opinion  and
recommendation of the Staff Judge Advocate, that the application  should  be
rejected as untimely.

2.    The applicant's case is adequately documented and  it  has  not  been
shown that a personal appearance with or without  counsel  will  materially
add to our understanding of the issues involved.   Therefore,  the  request
for a hearing is not favorably considered.

_________________________________________________________________

DECISION OF THE BOARD:

The application was not timely filed and it would not be in the interest  of
justice to waive the  untimeliness.   It  is  the  decision  of  the  Board,
therefore, to reject the application as untimely.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number  BC-2007-
03041 in Executive Session on 10 Jan 08 under  the  provisions  of  AFI  36-
2603:

                 Mr. James W. Russell III, Panel Chair
                 Mr. Mark J. Novitski, Member
                 Mrs. Lea Gallogly, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

      Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 10 Sep 07.
      Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
      Exhibit C. FBI Investigative Report.
      Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBC, dated 1 Nov 07, w/atch.
      Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBC, dated 1 Nov 07, w/atch.
      Exhibit F. Letter, Applicant, dated 16 Nov 07.




                             JAMES W. RUSSELL III
                             Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-03301

    Original file (BC-2007-03301.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-03301 INDEX CODE: 110.02 XXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 3 Oct 78, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Air...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01440

    Original file (BC-2013-01440.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01440 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge for misconduct—drug abuse be upgraded to Honorable. The reason for the Article 15 was the applicant did, on diverse occasions between 1 Apr 79 and 1 Apr 80, wrongfully use marijuana. In the interest...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-03866

    Original file (BC-2007-03866.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-03866 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under honorable conditions (general) discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. On 22 Sep 86, the applicant received a Letter of Counseling (LOC) for failing to report at the prescribed time to a military doctor and his...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01473

    Original file (BC-2007-01473.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    After completion of the appellate review process, applicant was discharged with a BCD on 18 Mar 98. A BCD was an appropriate sentence and properly characterizes his service. Having found no error or injustice with regard to the actions that occurred while the applicant was a military member, we conclude that no basis exists to grant favorable action on his request.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00509

    Original file (BC-2006-00509.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPPRS complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 17 Mar 06 for review and comment within 30 days and on 17 Apr 2006, he was forwarded a copy of the FBI report. Novel, Panel Chair Mr. Grover L. Dunn, Member Mr. John E. B. Smith, Member The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 21 Feb...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00933

    Original file (BC-2005-00933.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-00933 INDEX CODE: 106.00 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: Yes MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 19 Sep 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His 1985 general discharge be upgraded to honorable. On 6 Nov 85, the commander recommended the applicant be separated with a general discharge for drug abuse. Accordingly, we recommend...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00454

    Original file (BC-2007-00454.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    We conclude, therefore, that the discharge proceedings were proper and characterization of the discharge was appropriate to the existing circumstances. Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPPRS, dated 21 Feb 07. Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 9 Mar 07.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00537

    Original file (BC-2007-00537.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant entered active duty in the Air Force on 18 Jan 82. DPPRS states that based on the documentation on file in the applicant’s master personnel records, the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-03192

    Original file (BC-2007-03192.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-03192 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under honorable conditions (general) discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge and the narrative reason for separation changed. DPSOS states the applicant has not submitted any evidence or identified any errors...

  • AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD00-00040

    Original file (FD00-00040.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ATR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD ‘NAME OF SERVICE MEMRAER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) ~ PERSONAL APPEARANCE AIC GRADE AYSN/S84N X RECORD REVIEW NAME GF COUNSEL AND OK ORGANZA THOM ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION GF COLINSEL — M EMBERS SITTING HON GEN OTHC OTHER DENY at peer “INDEX NUMBER“ "" ERE PRIBIIS SUUMIFTED TO THE BOAR AQLS7 A66.00 ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE LETTER OF NOTIFICATION HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER GRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE ae et 23...