RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-02845
INDEX CODE: 110.00
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded to an under honorable
conditions (general) discharge.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He was absent without authority (AWOL), and not drunk on duty.
He has been a productive citizen for years.
The applicant's complete submission is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Applicant served on active duty in the Regular Air Force from 17 Aug 56
to 16 Aug 60, and was honorably released from active duty for expiration of
term of service and transferred to the Air Force Reserve. He served in the
Air Force Reserve from 17 Aug 60 to 16 Aug 62; and was discharged for
expiration of term of service on 16 Aug 62.
Applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 5 Jun 67, for a period of
four years.
Applicant received an Article 15 on 23 Aug 69, for failure to obey.
Punishment imposed was reduction to the grade of airman and forfeiture of
$50 pay for two months. Previous disciplinary action under Article 15,
dated 23 Aug 68, for drunk and disorderly behavior on station, with a
suspended reduction to airman was vacated 1 Jan 69, and he was fined $25
per month for two months.
On 22 Jun 70, applicant was tried and convicted by a special court-martial
for being AWOL from 18 Jul 69 – 28 Apr 70. He was sentenced to a bad
conduct discharge (BCD), forfeiture of $50.00 pay per month for four
months, confinement at hard labor for four months, and reduction to the
grade of airman basic. The BCD and forfeiture was suspended until 23 Mar
71, at which time, unless the suspension was sooner vacated, the suspended
portions of the sentence would be remitted without further action.
Applicant was afforded retraining with the provision for automatic
remission of his discharge contingent on a successful retraining period.
However, applicant again went AWOL while in retraining status. His
suspended discharge was vacated on 12 Jan 71. On 25 Jan 71, he was
discharged with a BCD. He was credited with 6 years, 4 months, and 20 days
of active military service (excludes 419 days lost time due to AWOL and
confinement).
On 23 Oct 80, applicant applied to the Air Force Discharge Review Board
(AFDRB) requesting that his BCD be upgraded to an honorable discharge.
After review of the evidence of record, the AFDRB concluded that the
discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements
of the Uniform Code of Military Justice and that the individual was
provided full due process. The Board concluded that the applicant’s
discharge should not be changed. The Board further concluded the applicant
did not establish the existence of any factor which renders his discharge
improper or inequitable and no such factor was discerned by the Board. A
copy of the AFDRB findings is attached at Exhibit B.
Pursuant to the Board’s request on 17 Sep 07, the Federal Bureau of
Investigation, Clarksburg, West Virginia, provided a copy of an
investigation report, which is attached at Exhibit C.
On 12 Oct 07, a copy of the FBI Report of Investigation was forwarded to
applicant for review and comment. At the same time the AFBCMR staff
offered the applicant an opportunity to provide information pertaining to
his activities since leaving the service (Exhibit D). To date, a response
has not been received.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of
justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice. The applicant’s discharge had its basis
in his trial and conviction by special court-martial. After careful
consideration of the available evidence, we found no indication that the
actions taken to affect his discharge were improper or based on factors
other than his own misconduct. Likewise, the applicant has not shown that
the discharge was improper or that the characterization of his discharge
was inappropriate under the circumstances. We considered upgrading the
discharge based on clemency; however, we do not find the evidence presented
is sufficient to compel us to recommend the relief sought on that basis.
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis
upon which to recommend granting the relief sought.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not
considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2007-
02845 in Executive Session on 21 December 2007, under the provisions of AFI
36-2603:
Ms. Charlene M. Bradley, Panel Chair
Ms. Audrey Y. Davis, Member
Ms. Patricia R. Collins, Member
The following documentary evidence pertaining to Docket Number BC-2007-
02845 was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 28 Jun 07.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. FBI Report of Investigation.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 12 Oct 07.
CHARLENE M. BRADLEY
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-00492
Capt M started court-martial proceedings against him. Although he has no proof, he feels his discharge was based on the ill-feelings Capt M had towards him. The applicant submitted a similar application to the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) requesting his discharge be upgraded to honorable.
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-01583
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was addicted to marijuana for many years of his life. Based on the available evidence of record, it appears the discharge was consistent with the substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and within the commander's discretionary authority. Exhibit F. Applicant’s Letter, dated 26 Jun 08, w/atchs.
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01028
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-01028 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 2 OCTOBER 2008 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His undesirable discharge be upgraded to general (under honorable conditions). Applicant was discharged on 10 Jan 74, in the grade of airman basic, under the provisions of AFM 39-12,...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03609
Applicant was discharged with a BCD on 27 Sep 74. Based on his overall record of service, and in view of the contents of the FBI Report of Investigation, we are not persuaded that an upgrade of the characterization of his discharge is warranted on the basis of clemency. Exhibit B.
On 21 Feb 57, the applicant was discharged from the Air Force in the grade of airman basic under the provisions of AFR 39-17 (Unfitness) with an undesirable discharge. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Military Personnel Management Specialist, AFPC/DPPRS, reviewed this application and indicated that the applicant did not identify any specific errors in the discharge proceedings nor provide facts warranting an upgrade of the discharge he received. Exhibit B.
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02826
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-02826 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. On 1 Aug 81, the applicant was counseled for failure to go. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF FBI...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-1995-02072
On 30 January 1980, the applicant appeared, with counsel, before the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB), to appeal that his discharge be upgraded to honorable. We considered upgrading the discharge based on clemency; however, the applicant has not provided any information concerning his post- service activities and accomplishments for us to conclude that he has overcome the behavioral traits which caused the discharge, and we do not find the evidence presented is sufficient to compel...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02038
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-02038 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. A copy of the FBI report was forwarded to the applicant on 17 October 2007 for review and response within 30 days (See Exhibit D). We considered...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02773
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-02773 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 11 March 2007 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under honorable conditions (general) discharge be upgraded to honorable. Second, dated 9 September 1981, for failure to go. Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-01005
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-01005 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence...