Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02845
Original file (BC-2007-02845.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-02845
            INDEX CODE:  110.00

            COUNSEL:  NONE
            HEARING DESIRED:  NO

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His  bad  conduct  discharge  (BCD)  be  upgraded  to  an  under   honorable
conditions (general) discharge.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He was absent without authority (AWOL), and not drunk on duty.

He has been a productive citizen for years.

The applicant's complete submission is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

Applicant served on active duty in the Regular Air Force from    17  Aug  56
to 16 Aug 60, and was honorably released from active duty for expiration  of
term of service and transferred to the Air Force Reserve.  He served in  the
Air Force Reserve from 17 Aug 60 to  16  Aug  62;  and  was  discharged  for
expiration of term of service on 16 Aug 62.

Applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 5 Jun 67,  for  a  period  of
four years.

Applicant received an Article  15  on  23  Aug  69,  for  failure  to  obey.
Punishment imposed was reduction to the grade of airman  and  forfeiture  of
$50 pay for two months.  Previous  disciplinary  action  under  Article  15,
dated 23 Aug 68, for drunk  and  disorderly  behavior  on  station,  with  a
suspended reduction to airman was vacated 1 Jan 69, and  he  was  fined  $25
per month for two months.

On 22 Jun 70, applicant was tried and convicted by a  special  court-martial
for being AWOL from 18 Jul 69 – 28 Apr  70.   He  was  sentenced  to  a  bad
conduct discharge (BCD),  forfeiture  of  $50.00  pay  per  month  for  four
months, confinement at hard labor for four  months,  and  reduction  to  the
grade of airman basic.  The BCD and forfeiture was suspended  until  23  Mar
71, at which time, unless the suspension was sooner vacated,  the  suspended
portions  of  the  sentence  would  be  remitted  without  further   action.
Applicant  was  afforded  retraining  with  the  provision   for   automatic
remission of his discharge contingent on  a  successful  retraining  period.
However,  applicant  again  went  AWOL  while  in  retraining  status.   His
suspended discharge was vacated on  12  Jan  71.   On  25  Jan  71,  he  was
discharged with a BCD.  He was credited with 6 years, 4 months, and 20  days
of active military service (excludes 419 days lost  time  due  to  AWOL  and
confinement).

On 23 Oct 80, applicant applied to the  Air  Force  Discharge  Review  Board
(AFDRB) requesting that his BCD  be  upgraded  to  an  honorable  discharge.
After review of the  evidence  of  record,  the  AFDRB  concluded  that  the
discharge was consistent with the procedural  and  substantive  requirements
of the Uniform  Code  of  Military  Justice  and  that  the  individual  was
provided full  due  process.   The  Board  concluded  that  the  applicant’s
discharge should not be changed.  The Board further concluded the  applicant
did not establish the existence of any factor which  renders  his  discharge
improper or inequitable and no such factor was discerned by  the  Board.   A
copy of the AFDRB findings is attached at Exhibit B.

Pursuant to the Board’s  request  on  17  Sep  07,  the  Federal  Bureau  of
Investigation,  Clarksburg,  West  Virginia,   provided   a   copy   of   an
investigation report, which is attached at Exhibit C.

On 12 Oct 07, a copy of the FBI Report of  Investigation  was  forwarded  to
applicant for review and  comment.   At  the  same  time  the  AFBCMR  staff
offered the applicant an opportunity to provide  information  pertaining  to
his activities since leaving the service (Exhibit D).  To date,  a  response
has not been received.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided  by  existing  law  or
regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest  of
justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been  presented  to  demonstrate  the
existence of error or injustice.  The applicant’s discharge  had  its  basis
in his  trial  and  conviction  by  special  court-martial.   After  careful
consideration of the available evidence, we found  no  indication  that  the
actions taken to affect his discharge were  improper  or  based  on  factors
other than his own misconduct.  Likewise, the applicant has not  shown  that
the discharge was improper or that the  characterization  of  his  discharge
was inappropriate under the  circumstances.   We  considered  upgrading  the
discharge based on clemency; however, we do not find the evidence  presented
is sufficient to compel us to recommend the relief  sought  on  that  basis.
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the  contrary,  we  find  no  basis
upon which to recommend granting the relief sought.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented  did  not  demonstrate
the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the  application  was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only  be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant  evidence  not
considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the  Board  considered  Docket  Number     BC-2007-
02845 in Executive Session on 21 December 2007, under the provisions of  AFI
36-2603:

      Ms. Charlene M. Bradley, Panel Chair
      Ms. Audrey Y. Davis, Member
      Ms. Patricia R. Collins, Member

The following documentary evidence  pertaining  to  Docket  Number  BC-2007-
02845 was considered:


    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 28 Jun 07.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  FBI Report of Investigation.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, AFBCMR, dated 12 Oct 07.




                                             CHARLENE M. BRADLEY
                                             Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-00492

    Original file (BC-2008-00492.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Capt M started court-martial proceedings against him. Although he has no proof, he feels his discharge was based on the ill-feelings Capt M had towards him. The applicant submitted a similar application to the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) requesting his discharge be upgraded to honorable.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-01583

    Original file (BC-2008-01583.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was addicted to marijuana for many years of his life. Based on the available evidence of record, it appears the discharge was consistent with the substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and within the commander's discretionary authority. Exhibit F. Applicant’s Letter, dated 26 Jun 08, w/atchs.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01028

    Original file (BC-2007-01028.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-01028 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 2 OCTOBER 2008 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His undesirable discharge be upgraded to general (under honorable conditions). Applicant was discharged on 10 Jan 74, in the grade of airman basic, under the provisions of AFM 39-12,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03609

    Original file (BC-2005-03609.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant was discharged with a BCD on 27 Sep 74. Based on his overall record of service, and in view of the contents of the FBI Report of Investigation, we are not persuaded that an upgrade of the characterization of his discharge is warranted on the basis of clemency. Exhibit B.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2000 | 9900471

    Original file (9900471.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 21 Feb 57, the applicant was discharged from the Air Force in the grade of airman basic under the provisions of AFR 39-17 (Unfitness) with an undesirable discharge. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Military Personnel Management Specialist, AFPC/DPPRS, reviewed this application and indicated that the applicant did not identify any specific errors in the discharge proceedings nor provide facts warranting an upgrade of the discharge he received. Exhibit B.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02826

    Original file (BC-2007-02826.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-02826 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. On 1 Aug 81, the applicant was counseled for failure to go. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF FBI...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-1995-02072

    Original file (BC-1995-02072.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 30 January 1980, the applicant appeared, with counsel, before the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB), to appeal that his discharge be upgraded to honorable. We considered upgrading the discharge based on clemency; however, the applicant has not provided any information concerning his post- service activities and accomplishments for us to conclude that he has overcome the behavioral traits which caused the discharge, and we do not find the evidence presented is sufficient to compel...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02038

    Original file (BC-2007-02038.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-02038 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. A copy of the FBI report was forwarded to the applicant on 17 October 2007 for review and response within 30 days (See Exhibit D). We considered...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02773

    Original file (BC-2005-02773.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-02773 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 11 March 2007 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under honorable conditions (general) discharge be upgraded to honorable. Second, dated 9 September 1981, for failure to go. Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-01005

    Original file (BC-2008-01005.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-01005 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence...