Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02733
Original file (BC-2007-02733.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

      IN THE MATTER OF:            DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2007-02733
            INDEX CODE: 112.10
      XXXXXXX                     COUNSEL:  NONE
                                   HEARING DESIRED:  NO

MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 3 MARCH 2009

______________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His reentry code of "4L"  which  denotes  "Separated  commissioning  program
eliminee" be changed to "1A" which  denotes  "Ineligible  to  reenlist,  but
condition waived."

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

During his time at the US Air Force Academy (USAFA), there were no  adverse
actions in his Cadet Personnel Record (CPR-II).  He received  an  honorable
discharge from the Air Force and was highly recommended for future  officer
training by both his Air Officer Commanding  Officer  and  Group  Commander
when he left the USAFA.

In support of his request, the applicant submits copies  of  DD  Form  785,
Record of Disenrollment from Officer Candidate -  Type  Training;  DD  Form
214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty; DD Form 256  AF,
Honorable  Discharge  Certificate;   USAFA   IMT   34,   Cadet   Separation
Clearance/Referral and letters from the USAFA.

His complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

Applicant entered the USAFA on 30 June 2005.

On 17 August 2006, the applicant submitted his request for resignation from
the USAFA for personal reasons.

On 29 September 2006 his request was approved.

At the time of his resignation, there were no adverse actions in his CPR II
but the applicant was on academic probation.  His  cumulative  Grade  Point
Average was 1.76, his cumulative Military Performance Average was 2.63, and
his cumulative Physical Education Average was 2.62.

On 27 October 2006, the applicant was honorably discharged.

His service was not creditable for any purpose in  a  commissioned  officer
status.  In addition, he did not complete his first full term of service.

He was enrolled in the USAFA for a total of 1 year, 3 months and 28 days.

________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

USAFA/DPYQ provides no recommendation.  DPYQ states a memorandum  from  the
United States Secretary of Defense, directed that Cadets and Midshipmen who
eliminate from a service academy must receive a reentry code in block 27 of
their DD Form 214.  The USAFA continues to use the reentry code of "4L"  in
accordance with AFI 36-2606, Reenlistment in the United States  Air  Force.
In addition, AFI 36-2012, Record of  Disenrollment  from  Office  Candidate
Type Training, directs anyone disenrolled from a service  academy  for  any
reason will have a DD Form 785 completed.  Military  services  use  the  DD
Form 785 to exchange information on a person  previously  disenrolled  from
officer candidate training and Section IV  includes  an  evaluation  to  be
considered for acceptance into future training.  Therefore,  the  applicant
was given this code as a result of disenrolling from the USAFA  and  not  a
result of adverse actions.

The complete DPYQ evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit D.

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to  the  applicant  on  21
September 2007 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, this
office has received no response (Exhibit D).

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided  by  existing  law  or
regulations.

2.    The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented  to  demonstrate  the
existence of an error or injustice.  We  took  notice  of  the  applicant’s
complete submission in judging the merits of the case,  however;  we  agree
with the Air Force office of primary responsibility that  his  RE  code  is
correct in accordance with established  policy.   Therefore  we  adopt  its
rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has  not  been
the victim of an error or injustice.  In the absence  of  evidence  to  the
contrary, we find no compelling basis  to  recommend  granting  the  relief
sought in this application.

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented  did  not  demonstrate
the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the  application  was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only  be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant  evidence  not
considered with this application.

________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number  BC-2007-
02733 in Executive Session on 1 November 2007, under the provisions  of  AFI
36-2603:

            Mr. Michael K. Gallogly, Panel Chair
            Ms. Mary C. Puckett, Member
            Ms. Debra K. Walker, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

      Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 23 August 2007, w/atchs.
      Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
      Exhibit C.  Letter, USAFA/DPYQ, dated 31 August 2007 w/atchs.
      Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 21 September 2007.





                                   MICHAEL K. GALLOGLY
                                   Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01674

    Original file (BC-2006-01674.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-01674 INDEX CODE: 104.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 4 Dec 07 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The DD Form 785, Record of Disenrollment From Officer Candidate-Type Training, dated 29 Jun 05, be amended by changing the words in Section III to reflect “Cadet P voluntarily resigned while...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00747

    Original file (BC-2004-00747.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-00747 INDEX CODE: 104.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Record of Disenrollment from Officer Candidate - Type Training (DD Form 785) Section III be changed as follows: 1. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03720

    Original file (BC-2004-03720.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-03720 INDEX NUMBER: 104.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: Yes _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The DD Form 785, “Record of Disenrollment from Officer Candidate-Type Training,” prepared on him, dated 13 Jan 01, be amended in Section IV, “Evaluation to be Considered in the Future for Determining Acceptability...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00404

    Original file (BC-2012-00404.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    JA states the applicant’s DD Form 785 correctly states the circumstances surrounding his situation at the time of his disenrollment from the USAFA. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: He resigned because his Squadron Air Officer Commanding (AOC) and Academy Military Trainer (AMT) repeatedly told him that if he tried to stay and fight the charges, he would be punished with a “5” rating, “Definitely Not Recommended,”...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02117

    Original file (BC-2011-02117.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02117 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, Block 27, Reentry Code be changed from 4L, which denotes “Separated commissioning program eliminee (OTS, AECP, and so on)” to a code suitable for reentry into the armed services...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00774

    Original file (BC-2007-00774.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-00774 INDEX CODE: 104.00 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: Sep 14, 2008 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 785, Record of Disenrollment from Officer Candidate – Type Training, rating of a “5” be re-evaluated so that he can attempt to earn a commission in the U.S. Marine Corps...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-00047

    Original file (BC-2009-00047.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    As of this date, this office has received no response (Exhibit C). _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00294

    Original file (BC-2013-00294.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The procedures for completing a DD Form 785 are contained in AFI36- 2012, Record of Disenrollment from Officer Candidate-Type Training – DD Form785, and are quite specific; however, his DD Form 785 contains falsehoods and is written in a highly inflammatory and prejudicial manner. An MPA of 2.73 is impossible for a cadet that would have already been on aptitude and conduct probation prior to being found guilty of dating a Cadet 4th Class (C4C) and maintaining an off base residence. When...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01492

    Original file (BC 2013 01492.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01492 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: USAFA/A1A recommends denying the applicant’s request to change his RE code. The applicant’s attorney states the applicant did not have the right to counsel at his...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01309

    Original file (BC-2010-01309.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On the USAFA IMT Form 34, Cadet Separation Clearance/Referral, his AOC and Group AOC recommended a DD Form 785 rating of “2.” On 8 March 2010, the USAFA Superintendant, after having considered the DD Form 785 rating recommendations from the Cadet Wing chain-of-command, assigned a DD Form 785 rating of “3.” The remaining relevant facts extracted from the applicant’s available military records, are contained in the advisory opinion from the Air Force office of primary responsibility at Exhibit...