RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-02340
INDEX CODE: 135.03
XXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His reassignment to inactive status be changed to indicate reassignment to
the Inactive Status List Reserve Section (ISLRS), and that his two
deferrals for promotion to the grade of major be removed from his record.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He was erroneously placed in the Non-Affiliated Reserve Section (NARS), and
should have been placed in the ISLRS.
He was unaware that when he was reassigned to the NARS, he would be
considered for promotion to the grade of major, and therefore did not rush
to complete his Professional Military Education (PME). He did not find out
he had been considered for promotion to the grade of major until after his
second promotion deferral.
He was not given any documentation, and he did not receive any counseling
advising him as to the consequences of being placed in the NARS versus the
ISLRS. He was led to believe that when assigned to the NARS, he would not
automatically be considered for promotion. He would like for the two
deferrals to be removed from his record in order to have the opportunity to
complete his PME before again being considered for promotion to the grade
of major.
In support of his appeal, he has provided copies of a personal statement, a
memorandum signed by the 482 OG/CC approving his reassignment, and a letter
from ARPC/DPP notifying him of his second deferral for promotion to the
grade of major, the fact he must now be discharged, and that his adjusted
mandatory separation date is 1 October 2007.
Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
A review of the applicant’s record indicates he was assigned to the Air
Force Reserve Unit Program from 2 February 2000 through 9 March 2007, and
that he requested transfer to the NARS on 9 September 2006. Since he did
not indicate that he had a hardship (personal/community), was not in or
eligible for sanctuary and was not yet twice-deferred for promotion, and
was not pending discharge for cause, he did not meet the criteria required
by AFI 36-2115, Assignments Within the Reserve Components, for an
assignment to the NARS.
Air Force Reserve members requesting voluntary reassignment to an inactive
status are assigned to either the Obligated Reserve Section (ORS) if their
Military Service Obligation (MSO) has not been completed, or to the Non-
obligated Non-participating Ready Personnel Section (NNRPS) once their MSO
has been completed. Since the applicant was not eligible for reassignment
to the NARS and did not have an outstanding MSO, he was assigned to the
NNRPS on 10 March 2007. His final Unit Training Assembly (UTA) was
performed on 14-15 September 2006, and the six months between the date of
request and effective date of transfer to the NNRPS was in compliance with
AFI 36-2115, paragraph 3.6.1.
The NNRPS is partially comprised of officers and enlisted personnel without
MSOs who volunteer for reassignment to ARPC. They are still qualified for
worldwide duty and are subject to mobilization by the President or
congressional authority. Members cannot participate for pay or points
(they do earn membership points while assigned), but they have a higher
priority for assignment to a participating program than members assigned to
the Standby Reserve. Members are normally retained in the NNRPS for two
years and, since it is not considered a break in service or active status,
are still eligible for promotion consideration.
After being assigned to the NNRPS for two years, officers who have not
resigned their commissions are normally next assigned to the ISLRS, where
they are retained for three years before being discharged. Assignment to
the ISLRS is considered a break in active status, but is not a break in
service. Officers cannot be considered for promotion while in the ILSRS,
and their date of rank is adjusted accordingly.
________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
ARPC/DPA recommends denial of the applicant’s request for direct assignment
to the ISLRS and removal of his two deferrals for promotion. His
assignment to the NNRPS was processed in accordance with the requirements
set forth in AFI 36-2115, and they advise that the promotion deferrals
occurred during boards that convened on 6 March 2006 and 12 February 2007
while he was still assigned to the Reserve Unit Program, and not after his
reassignment to the NNRPS.
The ARPC/DPA evaluation is at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
On 15 October 2007, the applicant requested an extension of time to gather
additional information to respond to the advisory opinion and/or add to the
documents that accompanied his application. He was advised on 16 October
2007, that in order to comply with a statutory mandate to process all
applications in a more expeditious manner, extensions of time in which to
respond to an advisory opinion or to gather additional information cannot
be honored, and if he needed more time, he could request that his case be
administratively closed until such time as he is able to proceed.
In December 2005, he decided that it would be in his and the Air Force’s
best interests for him to stop participating as a reservist due to growing
commitments with his civilian employment of running a small aircraft
charter business. These civilian commitments precluded him from dedicating
the time necessary to participate in a more satisfactory level to meet the
squadron requirements or to complete Squadron Officer School. With his
commander’s concurrence, he asked to be placed in a non-drilling status in
order to put his Air Force career on-hold until the business matured and
stabilized, at which time he would be able to recommit his focus back to
the military.
During his transition out of the military, he did not do the proper
research as to the long-term career implications of being assigned to the
NARS versus the ISLRS, and asked to be placed in the NARS. It was his
understanding that by being placed in the NARS, he would not be considered
by subsequent promotion boards until he re-affiliated with another reserve
unit. In retrospect, and with further education regarding inactive reserve
obligations, he should have initially requested to be placed into the ISLRS
rather than the NARS in order to stop his “promotion clock.”
In June 2007, he was offered a position as an Instructor Pilot at a U.S.
Navy Adversary Squadron based at NAS, Key West, and now wishes to continue
his military career. He hopes the technical errors he made when requesting
assignment to the inactive reserves do not end his career.
The applicant’s complete response, with attachment, is at Exhibit G.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant's
complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree
with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary
responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that
the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. He was not
eligible for voluntary reassignment to the NARS or the ISLRS, and his
assignment to the NNRPS was processed in accordance with the requirements
of the governing AF Instruction. Additionally, his promotion deferrals
occurred during boards that convened while he was still assigned to the Air
Force Reserve Unit Program, and not after his reassignment to the NNRPS.
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no
compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this
application.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not
considered with this application.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2007-02340
in Executive Session on 4 December 2007, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Ms Kathleen F. Graham, Panel Chair
Mr Richard K. Hartley, Member
Mr Reginald P. Howard, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 19 Jul 07, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, ARPC/DPA, dated 5 Sep 07.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 14 Sep 07.
BC-2007-02340
Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, dated 15 Oct 07.
Exhibit F. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 16 Oct 07.
Exhibit G. Letter, Applicant, dated 10 October 07 {sic},
w/atch.
KATHLEEN F. GRAHAM
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01909
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He began the process to get back into the military as an Active Guard and Reserve (AGR) member prior to being moved from the Non- obligated/Non-participating Ready Personnel Section (NNRPS) to ISLRS. The effective date of the applicant’s AGR assignment was 17 months after he was assigned to ISLRS. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-02302
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-02302 INDEX CODE: 100.03 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 26 January 2009 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Effective Date of Change of Strength Accountability (EDCSA) date be changed from 15 January 2006 to 13 February 2006. It is important to note that his first...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 04553
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04553 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. His record be further corrected to account for his denied promotion opportunities to lieutenant colonel and colonel, in that he was not considered by promotion board for which he would have been eligible had he been accessed in the correct rank. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01162
The time he was retained in the Inactive Status List Reserve Section (ISLRS) from 1 Mar 99 through 9 Nov 05 be removed. When discharged, the applicant received separation pay and was transferred to the NNRPS for a period of three years. If the Board approves, the applicants record should be corrected to show a 1 Mar 02 to 9 Nov 05 break in service and reappointment into his new position on 10 Nov 05.
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04464
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTS recommends the requested relief be denied. However, these assertions and the documentation provided are not sufficient to convince us the applicant...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02389
The applicant originally submitted his request for correction of his date of promotion to captain to the AFBCMR on 2 July 2010. Additional relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 1. The applicant was considered but not selected by the CY09 and CY10 Line of the Air Force Major Promotion Board...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-01411
When applicant was subsequently promoted to the grade of lieutenant colonel by the FY07 ANG Line and Non-line Lieutenant Colonel Promotion Board, he was considered by this board on-time and selected at his first eligibility. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03466
In response to the Air Force advisory, he amended his requests to include that his Assignment Action Reason (AAR) be changed to reflect Hardship/Death of Family Member, rather than QL/Civilian Airline Industry. The applicant contends that he was incorrectly assigned to the Inactive Ready Reserve with an inaccurate Assignment Action Reason. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02170
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02170 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He receive credit for all or some of the period served in Inactive Status List Reserve Section (ISLRS) to adjust his Total Federal Commissioned Service Date (TFCSD) and Mandatory Separation Date (MSD). The AFBCMR Legal Advisor recommends the Board...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03440
Although assignment to ISLRS is a break in active Reserve status, and an officer’s date of rank is adjusted accordingly, since they are ineligible for promotion consideration, it is not a break in service. Although applicant had four years, four months, and 12 days of non- participating service, he has had no break in service, and no error or injustice occurred with his assignment to ISLRS and subsequent change to his R/R date. ...