RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-01661
INDEX CODE: 112.10
XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
______________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His reenlistment (RE) code of “4C” which denotes "Separated for concealment
of juvenile records, failure to meet physical standards for enlistment,
failure to attain a 9.0 reading level as measured by the Air Force Reading
Abilities Test (AFRAT), or void enlistments" be changed to any "3" RE code
that allows him to enlist in the US Navy.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
AFI 148-123, Volume 2, Medical Examination and Standards paragraph
A3.24.3.8 states Osgood-Schlatter's disease is disqualifying if
symptomatic. He participated in organized athletics before and after
enlisting in the Air Force and has not had symptoms, pain or discomfort.
He did not realize this condition was disqualifying at the time of
enlistment. His knees were looked at several times before basic training
and no reasons to deny entry into the military were found. He is currently
trying to join the Navy and believes he is fully qualified to perform any
job. He does not believe the "4C" RE code correctly justifies his reason
for discharge.
In support of his request, the applicant submits a copy of his application
for employment examination and copies of his DD Form 214, Certificate of
Release or Discharge from Active Duty.
His complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Applicant enlisted in the Air Force on 24 February 2004 in the grade of
airman basic.
On 16 March 2004, he was notified by his commander that he was recommending
his discharge for Erroneous Enlistment. The specific reason for this
action was that during basic training, he was diagnosed with Osgood
Schlatters disease.
On 10 March 2004, it was determined he did not meet the minimum medical
standards and should not have been allowed to join the Air Force because of
his medical condition.
On 23 March 2004, he was discharged in the grade of airman basic with
uncharacterized service.
His narrative reason for separation was "Failed Medical/Physical
Procurement.
He served one month on active duty.
________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ AETC/SGPS states the applicant had a history of Osgood Schlatter's
disease that appears to have become symptomatic during basic training. On
9 March 2004, he was evaluated at Wilford Hall Medical Center and the
diagnosis was confirmed by x-ray. The evaluation also notes the condition
was interfering with his training. On the same day he was asked if he
wanted to pursue a waiver to remain in the military; however, he requested
he be released from military service. SGPS states, although they cannot
support the applicant's request to have his RE code changed to allow re-
entry based on the information they received, they can support the Board
changing his RE code if he is able to produce current medical documentation
reflecting his prior condition has been fully resolved.
The complete SGPS evaluation is at Exhibit C.
HQ AFPC/DPPAE recommends denial. DPPAE states they did not find evidence
of error or injustice; nor did the applicant submit evidence of any. The
RE code for this discharge is "4C". The Board may wish to consider
changing the applicant's RE code at such time when the applicant submits
medical documentation to support his claims and documentation from the
enlisting service that confirms acceptance. Once the applicant has
submitted these documents, the Board should direct the applicant's RE code
be changed to "3K"--"Reserved for use by HQ AFPC or the Air Force Board for
Correction of Military Records (AFBCMR) when no other reenlistment
eligibility code applies or is appropriate." The applicant has a favorable
recommendation from the medical provider for reenlistment after his
condition is resolved as stated on the SF Form 600, Chronological Record of
Medical Care.
The complete DPPAE evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit D
HQ AFPC/JA recommends approval. JA states to obtain relief from the
AFBCMR, the applicant must show by preponderance of the evidence that there
exists some error or injustice warranting corrective action. An airman may
be discharged from an erroneous enlistment if the airman would not have
been accepted for service if, through no fault of the airman, facts exist
unknown to the Air Force at the time of enlistment that, if known, might
have resulted in rejection to enlistment. In this case, the applicant had
never been medically treated for Osgood Schlatters disease prior to his
enlistment. The medical condition manifested during basic training. At
the time of discharge, the RE code placed on the applicant's record was
appropriate. However, in light of the medical evidence presented, the
applicant has demonstrated that he may no longer suffer from Osgood
Schlatters disease. Therefore in the interest of fairness, his current
medical condition, not the RE code, should control whether he should be
eligible for reenlistment in the service. JA opines for the reasons
discussed above, corrective action could be taken with regard to his RE
code.
The complete JA evaluation is at Exhibit E.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 2
November 2007 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, this
office has received no response (Exhibit F).
______________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of an injustice warranting corrective action. Even though the
applicant has provided no evidence to show that his separation was improper
or not in compliance with the appropriate regulations, it is the Board's
opinion that relief is warranted in this case. In this respect, after
careful review of the applicant's available military personnel records and
the fact his current medical evaluation suggests that he no longer suffers
from the effects of Osgood Schlatters disease, the Board believes that a
good probability exists that he may be able to provide effective and
meaningful service to our nation as a member of the armed forces.
Accordingly, the Board believes that correction of his RE code to a
waiverable code is warranted based on the merits of this case. Whether or
not he is successful in his attempts to return to the military will depend
on the needs of the service and our recommendation in no way guarantees
that he will be allowed to return to any branch of service. Therefore, the
Board recommends that his records be corrected to the extent indicated
below.
______________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating
to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that on 23 March 2004, he was discharged
under the provisions of AFI 36-3208, paragraph 1-2, (Secretarial Authority)
with a reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 3K.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2007-01661
in Executive Session on 3 January 2008, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Mr. Michael K. Gallogly, Panel Chair
Mr. Joseph D. Yount, Member
Ms. Teri G. Spoutz, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The following
documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 29 May 2007, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AETC/SGPS, dated 23 August 2007.
Exhibit D. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPSOA, dated 27 September 2007.
Exhibit E. Letter, HQ AFPC/JA, dated 26 October 2007.
Exhibit F. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 2 November 2007.
MICHAEL K. GALLOGLY
Panel Chair
[pic]
[pic]
Office of the Assistant Secretary
AFBCMR BC-2007-01661
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force
Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of
Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed
that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to XXXXXXX, XXXXXXX, be corrected to show corrected to show that
on 23 March 2004, he was discharged under the provisions of AFI 36-3208,
paragraph 1-2, (Secretarial Authority) with a reenlistment eligibility (RE)
code of 3K.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC2007-02179
It appears the specific reasons for this action was that she had back problems prior to entry on active duty but failed to disclose these problems until she was in BMT. In addition, SGPS states if the findings of the Board are in favor with the applicant, they can support her request to change her RE Code from “Fraudulent Entry” to "Not Medically Qualified.” The complete SGPS evaluation is at Exhibit C. HQ AFPC/DPPAE recommends denial. The applicant was discharged from the Air Force for...
If the applicant is desirous of seeking a waiver for this condition, then he must provide thorough evidence of complete lack of such residual effects, in keeping with these medical standards for enlistment, something he has not provided with the current application. A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. The Military Personnel Management Specialist, AFPC/DPPRS, reviewed the application and states that they concur with the AFBCMR Medical Consultant’s recommendation that...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03407
On 11 September 2007, the applicant was notified of his commanders intent to recommend the applicant for an entry-level separation for fraudulent enlistment under the provisions of Air Force Policy Directive 36-32 and Air Force Instruction 36-3208, Chapter 5, Section C. The commander indicated the reason for his recommendation was that he received a medical narrative summary on the applicant, dated 7 September 2007, that indentified the applicant as not meeting minimum medical standards to...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03930
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant enlisted into the Regular Air Force on 5 Jul 11. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinions and recommendations of the Air Force offices of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01975
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01975 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 2C (entry-level separation without character of service) on his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be changed to 1A (ineligible to reenlist, but condition waived). On 7 Dec 11, the applicant was...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-01417
SGPS advises they support the applicant’s request to change his RE code from “fraudulent entry” to “not medically qualified.” The AETC/SGPS complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSOA recommends approval. The AFPC/JA complete evaluation is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 2 Nov 07 for review and comment within 30 days. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03674
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-03674 INDEX CODE: 110.00, 112.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 3 JUN 08 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. Based on the confirmatory results, the Board should direct correction of his RE code to 3K — Reserved for use by HQ Air Force Personnel Center or the Air Force Board for...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00196
Based on the documentation on file in the master personnel records, the discharge, to include the character of service, and assigned separation and RE codes, was appropriately administered and was within the discretion of the discharge authority. The applicants DD Form 214 will be administratively corrected to reflect the correct RE code 2C unless otherwise directed by the Board. The complete AFPC/DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC2006-03798
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-03798 INDEX CODE: 112.10 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 16 JUNE 2008 ______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment (RE) code of “4F” be changed to a code that allows him to enlist in the US Coast Guard. Normally, members selected for reenlistment but failing to rank high enough...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01850
Although the discharge was proper, the applicant may now meet enlistment medical standards and the evidence warrants a change of RE code. The Consultant recommends approval but adds that a change of RE code by the Board is not equivalent to a finding of medically qualified for enlistment and does not guarantee acceptance by the Air Force for enlistment. A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit D. HQ AFPC/DPPAE advises the 4C RE code was applied in accordance with governing...