RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-02289
INDEX CODE: 110.00
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 23 JAN 09
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed from 4G (No AFSC skill
commensurate with grade), to allow him to reenter the Air Force.
_________________________________________________________________
THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
His discharge was part of a large drawdown program going on at that time.
Applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 11 Jun 91 as an airman
for a period of six years. On 19 Mar 94, he was honorably discharged from
active duty with an RE code of 4G. He served two years, nine months and
nine days on active duty.
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from
the applicant's military records, are contained in the letter prepared by
the appropriate office of the Air Force (Exhibit C)
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ AFPC/DPPAE recommends the requested relief be denied. DPPAE states the
applicant was provided an opportunity to retrain but chose to voluntarily
separate without a valid ASFC, which resulted in the RE code he received.
The complete AFPC/DPPAE evaluation is attached at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 31 Aug
07, for review and response within 30 days. As of this date, no response
has been received by this office.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of
justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of an error or an injustice. After careful consideration of this
case, we are not persuaded that the RE code he received upon separation
from active duty is in error or unjust. Applicant’s contentions are duly
noted; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air
Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis
for our conclusion that the applicant has failed to sustain his burden of
proof that he has suffered either an error or an injustice. Therefore, in
view of the above and in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find
no compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this
application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not
considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2007-02289
in Executive Session on 8 Nov 07, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Laurence M. Groner, Panel Chair
Mr. Reginald P. Howard, Member
Ms. Teri G. Spoutz, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 17 Jul 07.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPAE, dated 15 Aug 07.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 31 Aug 07.
LAURENCE M. GRONER
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01601
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-01601 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: Nov 24, 2008 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 2B be changed to a code which will allow him re-entry into the military. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-02488
Based on the member’s Enlistment Date of 17 May 05, the 1C431 was not a bonus AFSC at that time. He signed an Air Force Form 3008, Supplemental to Enlistment Agreement – United States Air Force, dated 17 May 2005, that guaranteed him training in AFSC 1T231, Pararescue Apprentice, for a $6,000 IEB. The Board notes the applicant signed and initialed an enlistment agreement for payment of a $6,000 IEB upon completion of technical training in AFSC 1T123.
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01296
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPPAE recommends the applicant’s request be denied. DPPAE states the applicant failed to comply with NCORP requirements and, as such, the RE code of 3E is correct. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02443
The applicant has not submitted any new evidence, and the Board does not find sufficiently persuasive evidence to override the decision made by the SAFPC. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02716
On 24 Sep 90, the applicant was honorably discharged under the provisions of AFR 39-10, with separation code HDG (Inability to perform prescribed duties due to parenthood), and was issued an RE code of 2C (Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge). A review of the applicant’s military records revealed that she was recommended for discharge from the Air Force for failure to fulfill dependent care responsibilities. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01857
The applicant responded by stating he “did not have a copy of his DD Form 214…you, the Air Force have responsibility to maintain these records….” The AFPC/DPPPR complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant provided a handwritten chronology of his time spent in the military without official documents. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-02224
After hearing the facts and circumstances of the investigations, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) upgraded his discharge from under other than honorable conditions to honorable. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02415
The purpose stated on his extension request is “retire during a requested extension period.” The extension request was approved on 19 April 2004, establishing a date of separation of 10 February 2005. On 22 February 2006, the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records (AFBCMR) considered and approved the applicant’s request to void and remove from his records, his Senior Enlisted Performance Report rendered for the period 31 May 2003 through 30 May 2004. In fact, the...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-02509
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-02509 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 10 FEB 09 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect he was awarded the Meritorious Service Medal first Oak Leaf Cluster (1 OLC), Air Force Commendation Medal (3 OLC) with Valor, the Kosovo Campaign Medal...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01370
On 13 Mar 03, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force for a period of four years in the grade of airman first class (E-3). _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPAE recommended denial noting that at the time of the applicant’s enlistment in the Regular Air Force on 13 Mar 03, she both initialed and signed an AF Form 3006 indicating she was enlisting in the pay grade of E-3, and that she had no claim to a higher grade. ...