Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01714
Original file (BC-2007-01714.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:                       DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2007-01714
                                             INDEX CODE:  110.00
      XXXXXXXXXXXXX                     COUNSEL:  NONE

                                             HEARING DESIRED:  NO


MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE:  30 November 2008


________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His Reentry Code (RE) of 4E be changed to reflect a present code.

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

His RE Code of 4E is a separation code listed for Army  personnel  from  the
Korean War.

He had three Article 15s for underage drinking,  and  he  does  not  believe
this RE code adequately reflects the required entry  {sic}  code  for  minor
offenses or similar cases.

In support of his appeal, he has submitted a copy of his DD Form 214,  dated
15 March 2007.

Applicant’s complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A.

________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

Applicant enlisted in the Regular Air  Force  for  four  years  and  entered
active duty on 17 June 2003.  He served 3 years, 8 months, and  29  days  of
net active service as a heavy  equipment  and  pavements  specialist  before
being honorably released from active duty  in  the  grade  of  airman  first
class (E-3) on 15 March 2007.  He is presently  assigned  to  the  Obligated
Reserve Section (ORS) at the  Air  Reserve  Personnel  Center  (ARPC)  until
completion of his Military Service Obligation (MSO) of 17 June 2011.

Applicant  voluntarily  submitted  a  request  for  separation   under   the
provisions of AFI 36-3208, paragraph 3.15 (miscellaneous reasons) via an  AF
IMT 31, Airman’s Request for Early Separation/Separation Based on Change  in
Service Obligation.  He requested a separation date prior to his  Expiration
of Term of Service (ETS) date of 17 June 2007, in order to accept  full-time
employment  with  Raytheon  Technologies.   His   commander   approved   his
application on 5 February 2007, and he was separated on  15 March  2007  and
given an RE Code of “4E” (Grade is airman first class or  below  and  airman
completed 31 or more  months  if  a  first-term  airman)  IAW  AFI  36-2606,
Reenlistment in the United States Air Force, Table 3.4, Item 5.

________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPPRS recommends denial.  Based on the documentation  on  file  in  his
master personnel records, the discharge was consistent with  the  procedural
and substantive requirements of the discharge  regulation,  and  was  within
the discretion of the discharge authority.  He did not submit  any  evidence
or identify  any  errors  or  injustices  that  occurred  in  the  discharge
processing, and has provided no facts warranting a change to his RE code.

The AFPC/DPPRS evaluation is at Exhibit C.

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A complete copy of the evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 13  July
2007, for review and comment, within 30 days.  However, as of this date,  no
response has been received by this office.

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided  by  existing  law  or
regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been  presented  to  demonstrate  the
existence of  error  or  injustice.   We  took  notice  of  the  applicant's
complete submission in judging the merits of the  case;  however,  we  agree
with the opinion and recommendation of  the  Air  Force  office  of  primary
responsibility and adopt their rationale as the  basis  for  our  conclusion
that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or  injustice.  Based
on the documentation on file in his master personnel records,  the  RE  code
is correct in that he was a first-term airman serving in the pay grade of E-
3, and had completed more than 31  months  at  the  time  of  his  voluntary
separation.  Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we  find
no compelling  basis  to  recommend  granting  the  relief  sought  in  this
application.

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented  did  not  demonstrate
the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the  application  was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only  be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant  evidence  not
considered with this application.

________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered  Docket  Number  BC-2007-01714
in Executive Session on 30 August 2007, under  the  provisions  of  AFI  36-
2603:

                       Mr. Jay H. Jordan, Panel Chair
                       Mr. James L. Sommer, Member
                       Mr. Steven A. Cantrell, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 16 May 07, w/atch.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPPRS, dated 12 Jun 07.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 13 Jul 07.




                                   JAY H. JORDAN
                                   Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01342

    Original file (BC-2007-01342.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 20 April 2007, her commander notified her he was recommending she be discharged from the Air Force for fraudulent entry. The base legal office reviewed the case and found it legally sufficient to support separation and recommended the applicant be separated from the service with an entry-level separation. DPPRS states based on the documentation on file in the master personnel records; the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00579

    Original file (BC-2006-00579.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    He did his separation paperwork on 20 Jul 02, one month shy of the six months; therefore, he received a RE code of 4E, even though his military separation date with the United States Air Force was 5 Sep 02. He was assigned RE code “4E” which denotes “Grade is airman first class or below and airman completed 31 or more months (55 months for 6-year enlistees), if a first-term airman; or, grade is airman first class or below and the airman is a second-term or career airman.” He was assigned...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03919

    Original file (BC-2006-03919.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-03919 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 25 JUN 08 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. The discharge authority concurred with the recommendations and directed that he be discharged with...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02377

    Original file (BC-2006-02377.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 9 December 1981, the discharge authority directed that the applicant be discharged from the Air Force under the provisions of AFM 39-12, paragraph 2-78, for the good of the service, with a type of discharge as under other than honorable conditions. On 20 February 2007, a letter was forwarded to applicant suggesting that he consider providing evidence pertaining to his post-service activities. Exhibit C. FBI Identification Record Number 234583W5, dated 9 Feb 07.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-02314

    Original file (BC-2007-02314.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    At the time of his discharge on 16 December 2004, he was serving in the grade of airman first class (E-3), and had completed 5 years, 2 months, and 3 days of net active service. The AFPC/DPPAE evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A complete copy of the evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 31 August 2007, for review and comment, within 30 days. Novel, Panel Chair Mr. Reginald P....

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01255

    Original file (BC-2007-01255.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-01255 INDEX CODE: 100.03 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 26 OCT 2008 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 4E (Grade is A1C or below and the airman completed 31 or more months (55 months for six-year enlistees), if a first-term airman; or,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02562

    Original file (BC-2004-02562.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPRS states based on the fact applicant was serving in the grade of airman first class and had completed over 31 months of active duty, she was ineligible to reenlist or extend her enlistment. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinions and recommendations of the Air Force and adopt their rationale as the basis for the conclusion that the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01732

    Original file (BC-2007-01732.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 12 December 2006, the Secretary of the Air Force Personnel Council directed that he be separated from the Air Force for physical disability due to a condition that existed prior to service. He received an RE code of 2Q “Personnel Medically Retired or Discharged.” He served 28 days total active service. DPPD states the preponderance of evidence reflects that no error or injustice occurred during the disability process at the time of separation.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01578

    Original file (BC-2005-01578.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01578 INDEX NUMBER: 110.02 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: No MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 10 Nov 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed from “4H,” “Serving suspended punishment pursuant to Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) to “1J,”...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00044

    Original file (BC-2007-00044.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The complete DPPRS evaluation is at Exhibit D. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant states he was never notified of being discharged because he had opted for an early out. Applicants states he visited legal personnel concerning the issue of racism; however, he was told there was nothing that could be done and it was best if he just got out of the military. ...