RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-01492
INDEX CODE: 112.10
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 13 November 2008
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed to permit his reentry
into the military.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He was given an RE code of “4C” (failed to meet physical standards for
enlistment) when he was separated from the Air Force; however, his ankle
injury was not serious enough to prevent him from being a productive member
of the military, nor did it prevent him from performing his job. He has
been separated from the Air Force for 15 years and hasn’t been bothered by
his ankle. He would like to join another branch of service.
In support of his appeal, the applicant provides copies of medical
documents concerning his ankle.
The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 3 September 1992, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force at the
age of 18 in the grade of airman basic (E-1).
On 7 October 1992, the applicant was seen at the dispensary complaining of
left ankle pain. Patient history along with X-rays taken found evidence of
past severe ankle strains in 1991 with persistent symptoms since then. The
orthopedic clinic diagnosed the applicant with recurrent instability of the
left ankle and placed him on medical hold pending further medical
evaluation. A Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) Report, dated 8 October 1992,
diagnosed the applicant with chronic instability of the left ankle and that
his condition was not incurred while entitled to basic pay; existed prior
to service; and was not aggravated permanently by service. The MEB’s
recommendation was the applicant be discharged from the service by reason
of physical disability.
On 16 October 1992, his commander notified the applicant that he was being
recommended for discharge for erroneous enlistment, because he did not meet
minimum medical standards to join the Air Force. The applicant
acknowledged receipt of the notification and waived his right to consult
counsel and to submit statements in his own behalf. The discharge
authority approved the applicant’s discharge on 16 October 1992.
On 20 October 1992, the applicant was discharged with an uncharacterized
entry level separation with an RE code of “4C.” He served 1 month, and 18
days on active duty.
________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AETC/SGPS supports changing the applicant’s RE code to allow future
military duty if he is interested in reapplying. SGPS states that although
the applicant did have a medical condition that kept him from participating
and completing basic training, his symptoms were more related to a recent
injury versus a past problem. Per his statements and supporting orthopedic
evaluation, dated 21 October 2005, he appears to be fully recovered, and
does not have any chronic problems with his ankle. Even though, his
condition appears to be resolved, and he currently has no physical activity
limitations, the decision to medically separate him in 1992 was correct.
The SGPS evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 27
July 2007 for review and response within 30 days (Exhibit D). As of this
date, this office has received no response.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of
justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of probable injustice. After a thorough review of the
applicant’s submission and the evidence of record we are persuaded that
relief is warranted. We find no evidence to show that the applicant’s
discharge was erroneous or unjust; however, we note the applicant has
provided a medical evaluation letter from his civilian physician attesting
to the fact that his physical condition is no longer deficient to withstand
the rigors of military service. Since the applicant will have to pass a
physical prior to his reentry into the military, we feel the applicant
should be afforded the opportunity of having a waiverable RE code if the
service is interested in his skills. Therefore, we recommend that the
applicant’s records be corrected as indicated below.
_________________________________________________________________
RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating
to APPLICANT be corrected to show that at the time of his discharge on 20
October 1992, his reenlistment eligibility (RE) code was 3K.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive
Session on 4 October 2007, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Laurence M. Groner, Panel Chair
Ms. Mary C. Puckett, Member
Ms. Josephine L. Davis, Member
By a majority vote, the Board recommended to grant the application. Ms.
Davis voted to deny the applicant’s request but did not wish to submit a
minority report. The following documentary evidence for AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2007-01492 was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 7 May 07, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AETC/SGPS, dated 9 Jul 07.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 27 Jul 07.
LAURENCE M. GRONER
Panel Chair
AFBCMR BC-2007-01492
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force
Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section
1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, be corrected to show that at the time
of his discharge on 20 October 1992, his reenlistment eligibility (RE) code
was 3K.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01198
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-01198 INDEX CODE: 110.00, 112.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 19 OCT 08 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AETC/SGPS recommends the applicant’s separation code, RE code, and narrative reason be...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03407
On 11 September 2007, the applicant was notified of his commanders intent to recommend the applicant for an entry-level separation for fraudulent enlistment under the provisions of Air Force Policy Directive 36-32 and Air Force Instruction 36-3208, Chapter 5, Section C. The commander indicated the reason for his recommendation was that he received a medical narrative summary on the applicant, dated 7 September 2007, that indentified the applicant as not meeting minimum medical standards to...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011- 00800
Based on a review of the records provided, the applicant entered the service on 1 Jun 10 and was separated 23 Jun 10. The complete AETC/SGPS evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSOA recommends changing the applicant’s RE code to 2C, - "Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service. Therefore, we recommend his records be corrected as indicated below.
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04753
The complete SGPS evaluation is at Exhibit D. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 6 May 2011, for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit E). However, a recent medical evaluation submitted by the applicant indicates she does not present symptoms or reaction to bananas. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC2007-02179
It appears the specific reasons for this action was that she had back problems prior to entry on active duty but failed to disclose these problems until she was in BMT. In addition, SGPS states if the findings of the Board are in favor with the applicant, they can support her request to change her RE Code from “Fraudulent Entry” to "Not Medically Qualified.” The complete SGPS evaluation is at Exhibit C. HQ AFPC/DPPAE recommends denial. The applicant was discharged from the Air Force for...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-00291
SGPS states that although the applicant enlisted in the Air Force following her enlistment physical on 23 February 1989, her medical defect should have rendered her disqualified for military service at the time of her examination and still today. Under this criteria and because of her medical diagnosis, and the unpredictability of her medical condition, she was certified medically disqualified for military service. Mechanisms are in place to grant waivers for individual cases when the best...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04534
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-04534 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) code of 4C (Separated for concealment of juvenile records, minority, failure to meet physical standards for enlistment, failure to attain a 9.0 reading grade level as measured by the Air Force Reading Abilities Test, or...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02366
His correct RE code is 2C (Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service) as required by AFI 36-2606, Reenlistments in the USAF, based on his entry level separation without characterization of service. DPSOA has confirmed that the 4C RE code currently listed on the applicants DD Form 214 is erroneous and that it will administratively correct the applicants DD Form 214 to reflect 2C. However, it is noted that SGPS...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00406
On 29 Jan 10, the applicant was notified by his commander that he was recommending his discharge from the Air Force for erroneous enlistment. Although both AFPC/DPSOA and DPSOS recommend denial of relief DPSOA does note the applicants RE code is in error, and should be 2C; however, based on the review and recommendation provided by AETC/SGPS we believe his RE code should be changed to 3K, which would afford him the opportunity to apply for enlistment in the armed services. We note that...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-01661
Once the applicant has submitted these documents, the Board should direct the applicant's RE code be changed to "3K"--"Reserved for use by HQ AFPC or the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records (AFBCMR) when no other reenlistment eligibility code applies or is appropriate." At the time of discharge, the RE code placed on the applicant's record was appropriate. Accordingly, the Board believes that correction of his RE code to a waiverable code is warranted based on the merits of...