Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01492
Original file (BC-2007-01492.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:                       DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2007-01492
                                       INDEX CODE:  112.10
      XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX                COUNSEL: NONE

                                             HEARING DESIRED:  NO


MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE:  13 November 2008


_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be  changed  to  permit  his  reentry
into the military.
_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He was given an RE code of “4C”  (failed  to  meet  physical  standards  for
enlistment) when he was separated from the Air  Force;  however,  his  ankle
injury was not serious enough to prevent him from being a productive  member
of the military, nor did it prevent him from performing  his  job.   He  has
been separated from the Air Force for 15 years and hasn’t been  bothered  by
his ankle.  He would like to join another branch of service.

In  support  of  his  appeal,  the  applicant  provides  copies  of  medical
documents concerning his ankle.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

On 3 September 1992, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force at  the
age of 18 in the grade of airman basic (E-1).

On 7 October 1992, the applicant was seen at the dispensary  complaining  of
left ankle pain.  Patient history along with X-rays taken found evidence  of
past severe ankle strains in 1991 with persistent symptoms since then.   The
orthopedic clinic diagnosed the applicant with recurrent instability of  the
left  ankle  and  placed  him  on  medical  hold  pending  further   medical
evaluation.  A Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) Report, dated 8 October  1992,
diagnosed the applicant with chronic instability of the left ankle and  that
his condition was not incurred while entitled to basic  pay;  existed  prior
to service; and was  not  aggravated  permanently  by  service.   The  MEB’s
recommendation was the applicant be discharged from the  service  by  reason
of physical disability.

On 16 October 1992, his commander notified the applicant that he  was  being
recommended for discharge for erroneous enlistment, because he did not  meet
minimum  medical  standards  to  join  the   Air   Force.    The   applicant
acknowledged receipt of the notification and waived  his  right  to  consult
counsel  and  to  submit  statements  in  his  own  behalf.   The  discharge
authority approved the applicant’s discharge on 16 October 1992.

On 20 October 1992, the applicant was  discharged  with  an  uncharacterized
entry level separation with an RE code of “4C.”  He served 1 month,  and  18
days on active duty.

________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AETC/SGPS  supports  changing  the  applicant’s  RE  code  to  allow  future
military duty if he is interested in reapplying.  SGPS states that  although
the applicant did have a medical condition that kept him from  participating
and completing basic training, his symptoms were more related  to  a  recent
injury versus a past problem.  Per his statements and supporting  orthopedic
evaluation, dated 21 October 2005, he appears to  be  fully  recovered,  and
does not have any  chronic  problems  with  his  ankle.   Even  though,  his
condition appears to be resolved, and he currently has no physical  activity
limitations, the decision to medically separate him in 1992 was correct.

The SGPS evaluation is at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the  applicant  on  27
July 2007 for review and response within 30 days (Exhibit D).  As of  this
date, this office has received no response.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided  by  existing  law  or
regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest  of
justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Sufficient relevant evidence  has  been  presented  to  demonstrate  the
existence  of  probable  injustice.   After  a  thorough   review   of   the
applicant’s submission and the evidence of  record  we  are  persuaded  that
relief is warranted.  We find no  evidence  to  show  that  the  applicant’s
discharge was erroneous or  unjust;  however,  we  note  the  applicant  has
provided a medical evaluation letter from his civilian  physician  attesting
to the fact that his physical condition is no longer deficient to  withstand
the rigors of military service.  Since the applicant will  have  to  pass  a
physical prior to his reentry into  the  military,  we  feel  the  applicant
should be afforded the opportunity of having a waiverable  RE  code  if  the
service is interested in his  skills.   Therefore,  we  recommend  that  the
applicant’s records be corrected as indicated below.

_________________________________________________________________

RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD:

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air  Force  relating
to APPLICANT be corrected to show that at the time of his  discharge  on  20
October 1992, his reenlistment eligibility (RE) code was 3K.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered this application in  Executive
Session on 4 October 2007, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

                 Mr. Laurence M. Groner, Panel Chair
                 Ms. Mary C. Puckett, Member
                 Ms. Josephine L. Davis, Member


By a majority vote, the Board recommended to  grant  the  application.   Ms.
Davis voted to deny the applicant’s request but did not  wish  to  submit  a
minority report.  The  following  documentary  evidence  for  AFBCMR  Docket
Number BC-2007-01492 was considered:

     Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 7 May 07, w/atchs.
     Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
     Exhibit C.  Letter, AETC/SGPS, dated 9 Jul 07.
     Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 27 Jul 07.




                                  LAURENCE M. GRONER
                                  Panel Chair


AFBCMR BC-2007-01492




MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF

      Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force
Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section
1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that:

      The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, be corrected to show that at the time
of his discharge on 20 October 1992, his reenlistment eligibility (RE) code
was 3K.





  JOE G. LINEBERGER

  Director

  Air Force Review Boards Agency

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01198

    Original file (BC-2007-01198.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-01198 INDEX CODE: 110.00, 112.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 19 OCT 08 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AETC/SGPS recommends the applicant’s separation code, RE code, and narrative reason be...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03407

    Original file (BC-2011-03407.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 11 September 2007, the applicant was notified of his commander’s intent to recommend the applicant for an entry-level separation for fraudulent enlistment under the provisions of Air Force Policy Directive 36-32 and Air Force Instruction 36-3208, Chapter 5, Section C. The commander indicated the reason for his recommendation was that he received a medical narrative summary on the applicant, dated 7 September 2007, that indentified the applicant as not meeting minimum medical standards to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011- 00800

    Original file (BC-2011- 00800.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Based on a review of the records provided, the applicant entered the service on 1 Jun 10 and was separated 23 Jun 10. The complete AETC/SGPS evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSOA recommends changing the applicant’s RE code to 2C, - "Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service. Therefore, we recommend his records be corrected as indicated below.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04753

    Original file (BC-2010-04753.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The complete SGPS evaluation is at Exhibit D. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 6 May 2011, for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit E). However, a recent medical evaluation submitted by the applicant indicates she does not present symptoms or reaction to bananas. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC2007-02179

    Original file (BC2007-02179.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    It appears the specific reasons for this action was that she had back problems prior to entry on active duty but failed to disclose these problems until she was in BMT. In addition, SGPS states if the findings of the Board are in favor with the applicant, they can support her request to change her RE Code from “Fraudulent Entry” to "Not Medically Qualified.” The complete SGPS evaluation is at Exhibit C. HQ AFPC/DPPAE recommends denial. The applicant was discharged from the Air Force for...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-00291

    Original file (BC-2004-00291.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    SGPS states that although the applicant enlisted in the Air Force following her enlistment physical on 23 February 1989, her medical defect should have rendered her disqualified for military service at the time of her examination and still today. Under this criteria and because of her medical diagnosis, and the unpredictability of her medical condition, she was certified medically disqualified for military service. Mechanisms are in place to grant waivers for individual cases when the best...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04534

    Original file (BC-2010-04534.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-04534 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) code of 4C (Separated for concealment of juvenile records, minority, failure to meet physical standards for enlistment, failure to attain a 9.0 reading grade level as measured by the Air Force Reading Abilities Test, or...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02366

    Original file (BC 2013 02366.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His correct RE code is 2C (Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service) as required by AFI 36-2606, Reenlistments in the USAF, based on his entry level separation without characterization of service. DPSOA has confirmed that the “4C” RE code currently listed on the applicant’s DD Form 214 is erroneous and that it will administratively correct the applicant’s DD Form 214 to reflect “2C.” However, it is noted that SGPS...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00406

    Original file (BC-2011-00406.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 29 Jan 10, the applicant was notified by his commander that he was recommending his discharge from the Air Force for erroneous enlistment. Although both AFPC/DPSOA and DPSOS recommend denial of relief DPSOA does note the applicant’s RE code is in error, and should be 2C; however, based on the review and recommendation provided by AETC/SGPS we believe his RE code should be changed to 3K, which would afford him the opportunity to apply for enlistment in the armed services. We note that...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-01661

    Original file (BC-2007-01661.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Once the applicant has submitted these documents, the Board should direct the applicant's RE code be changed to "3K"--"Reserved for use by HQ AFPC or the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records (AFBCMR) when no other reenlistment eligibility code applies or is appropriate." At the time of discharge, the RE code placed on the applicant's record was appropriate. Accordingly, the Board believes that correction of his RE code to a waiverable code is warranted based on the merits of...