RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-01385
INDEX CODE: 108.07
XXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His service-connected medical condition, traumatic arthritis (left
shoulder), be assessed as combat-related in order to qualify for
compensation under the Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC) Act.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He dislocated his left shoulder while inspecting an aircraft intake. He
was taken to the base hospital where he was examined and released. His
shoulder continued to dislocate until it was repaired by surgery.
In support of his request, applicant provides a personal statement and
excerpts from his military personnel and medical records.
The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 1 Oct 77, applicant retired from the Air Force in the grade of master
sergeant, after serving 20 years, 1 month, and 26 days on active duty.
Available Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) records reflect a combined
compensable rating of 40% for his service-connected conditions.
His CRSC application was partially approved on 8 March 2007, for impaired
hearing and tinnitus. His request for compensation for his traumatic
arthritis (right knee) and traumatic arthritis (left shoulder) were
disapproved because there was no evidence to confirm these disabilities
were the direct result of armed conflict, hazardous service,
instrumentality of war, or simulating war.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPD recommends denial. DPPD states that although the applicant’s
condition has been deemed service-connected by the DVA, their standard is
to grant service connection for injuries or diseases manifested (or
residuals of these injuries were treated) while in service and, if
necessary, resolve doubt in the interest of the veteran. DPPD advises that
the applicant’s service medical records confirm he dislocated his shoulder
while inspecting an aircraft intake. However, by itself, routine aircraft
maintenance is a normal day to day activity and is not considered combat-
related. The AFPC/DPPD complete evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 3 July
2007 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, this office
has received no response.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice. After a thorough review of the available
evidence of record, it is our opinion that the service-connected medical
condition the applicant believes is combat-related was not incurred as the
direct result of armed conflict, while engaged in hazardous service, in the
performance of duty under conditions simulating war, or through an
instrumentality of war, and, therefore, does not qualify for compensation
under the CRSC Act. We agree with the opinion and recommendation of the
Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the
basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an
error or injustice. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no
compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this
application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not
considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2007-01385
in Executive Session on 2 November 2007, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Chair
Mr. Michael V. Barbino, Member
Mr. Alan Blomgren, Member
The following documentary evidence pertaining to Docket Number BC-2007-
01385 was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 23 April 2007, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPD, dated 5 June 2007.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 3 July 2007.
THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02060
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His injuries were incurred when he fell off a ladder entering a B-29 aircraft. DPPD states a review of his service and DVA medical records show his degenerative arthritis and limited motion of arm are not combat related. After a thorough review of the available evidence of record, it is our opinion that the service-connected medical conditions the applicant believes are combat-related were not...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-03802
In support of her request, the applicant provided a personal letter and documentation associated with her CRSC application. Available DVA records reflect a combined compensable rating of 90% for her service-connected conditions. The complete DPPD evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 8 February 2008 for...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-00767
In support of his request, applicant provided a personal statement, his CRSC denial letter, and documents extracted from his medical and flight records. The DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant states the definite causal relationship can be found in the fact that his injury would not have occurred if he was not a crewmember, performing official duties, during ongoing combat...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02830
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-02830 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: All of his service-connected medical conditions be assessed as combat related in order to qualify for compensation under the Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC) Act. There are no service medical record entries for injuries...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01088
Available Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) records reflect a combined compensable rating of 20% for his unfitting conditions. DPPD states the applicant initially requested review of his service-connected disabilities of back strain, degenerative arthritis of the hands and knees, and bursitis of the shoulder. We agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2004-01986
His CRSC application was disapproved on 19 Apr 04 based upon the fact that his service-connected medical conditions were determined not to be combat- related. DPPD states a review of his service and DVA medical records show his skin condition is not combat related. The DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 28 Jan 05...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02767
Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. After a thorough review of the available evidence of record, it is our opinion that the service-connected medical conditions the applicant believes are combat-related were not incurred as the direct result of armed conflict, while engaged in hazardous service, in the performance of duty under conditions simulating war, or through an instrumentality of war, and therefore, do not qualify for compensation under the CRSC Act. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-01017
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The injury to his cervical spine and right shoulder occurred at the same time; however, his neck injury was not documented in his medical records and therefore not covered under CRSC guidelines. It can only be speculated why the military physician did not record the neck injury in his medical records. Therefore, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02061
His CRSC application was disapproved on 22 Mar 04 based upon the fact that evidence provided did not show his service-connected medical conditions were combat-related. The DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 30 Jul 04 for review and comment within 30 days. We agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-00761
In support of his request, applicant provided a personal statement and documentation extracted from his DVA and military medical records. The DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In response to the Air Force evaluation, applicant provided additional documents extracted from his medical records. Exhibit E. Medical Record Excerpts.