RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-01269
INDEX CODE: 110.02
XXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: MR. WAYNE E. ANDERSON
HEARING DESIRED: YES
MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 26 October 2008
_______________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His retired grade be corrected to reflect the grade of colonel (O-6).
_______________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He was informed that due to restructuring he would be involuntarily
separated from active duty and forced to retire. He served over six months
in the grade of colonel which qualifies him under the provisions of Title
10 United States Code (USC), Section 1370(a)2(A) and (a)(3), and Air Force
Instruction 36-3202, paragraph 7.2.4, to retire in the grade of colonel (O-
6).
In support of his appeal, the applicant provided a personal statement; a
statement from his counsel; Notification of Involuntary Separation;
Commander, Georgia Air National Guard (GA ANG) memorandum; GA ANG Adjutant
General memorandum; USAF/A4/7 memorandum; and Request for Retirement
Reconsideration, dated 15 July 2003, with attachments.
The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_______________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 1 December 2002, the applicant retired from the GA ANG under Title 10
USC Section 8911, after serving 21 years, 7 months, and 27 days of active
duty service. During his last Active Guard/Reserve (AGR) tour scheduled
for 1 August 2001 through 31 July 2002, the applicant was selected for
promotion to the grade of colonel effective 21 March 2002.
On 20 April 2002, the applicant was notified that his AGR tour was being
extended to 30 November 2002 and, due to force management reasons, he would
be involuntarily separated on that date. The notification from the
Commander, GA ANG, explained that the four-month extension was to allow the
applicant sufficient personal time to prepare for his separation and
subsequent retirement effective 1 December 2002.
On 30 November 2002, the applicant was honorably discharged in the grade of
colonel (O-6) for the purpose of retirement. He retired effective 1
December 2002. According to the applicant, upon receiving his initial
retirement pay, he discovered that he was retired in the pay grade of
lieutenant colonel (O-5) because he had not served three years time-in-
grade as a colonel.
_______________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
ARPC/DPP recommends the applicant’s request be denied. DPP states in order
to retire under the provisions of title 10 USC, Section 8911, in a grade
above major, a member must complete three years active duty service in
grade per Title 10 USC, Section 1370(a)(2)(A). The three year time-in-
grade requirement is reduced to six months if the member is involuntarily
released from active duty, without his consent. The applicant did not
complete three years active duty service in the grade of colonel to retire
voluntarily. The applicant did complete over six months of active duty
service in the grade of colonel; however, it is their opinion that he was
not involuntarily released from active duty without his consent.
DPP states the applicant, like many others, consented to an AGR tour of
defined length. The conclusion of those tours has not been held to be
“involuntary” because the member was fulfilling a limited duty he
voluntarily accepted. To now conclude that failure to perform further duty
is “involuntary” in the sense of Title 10 USC, Section 1370(a)(3) would
possibly affect numerous individuals and would not be within the intention
of the statue.
DPP states if the Board does not agree with their recommendation, it should
be shown the applicant’s release from active duty on 30 November 2002 was
involuntary, without his consent.
The DPP advisory, with attachment, is at Exhibit D.
_______________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The applicant’s counsel responded that the Air Force advisory opinion fails
to address critical statutory issues, the uncontradicted statements of
several general officers with first hand knowledge of the issues, and the
applicant’s good-faith reliance on the representations made by the National
Guard Bureau (NGB) and the GA ANG Human Resources Office. The applicant
acted to his detriment in good faith reliance on the advice given to him by
the “experts.” He would not have accepted the involuntary retirement had
he known that his grade would not be determined as colonel (O-6) for
retirement. It is clear that if the answer had been anything other than
the answer he received, he would not have been forced to retire. There is
no basis in law or equity for denying the applicant’s appeal. Any other
result would be a clear injustice.
The counsel’s rebuttal is at Exhibit E.
_______________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of an error or injustice. After a thorough review of the
evidence of record, the Board has determined the evidence supports the fact
that the applicant was involuntarily released from active duty effective
30 November 2002 and retired effective 1 December 2002. The Board notes
his commander’s letter of notification to the applicant, dated 20 April
2002, which states, “…my decision to direct you to involuntarily retire
should in no way be construed as negatively reflecting on your professional
or personal performance.” The fact his commander extended the applicant’s
orders from 31 July 2002 to 30 November 2002 in order to allow the
applicant sufficient time to prepare for his separation, does not negate
the commander’s decision to involuntarily release him. In any event, we
feel he has suffered an error or injustice that should be rectified in his
favor. In view of the foregoing, it is our opinion that the applicant’s
records should be corrected as indicated below.
_______________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating
to APPLICANT be corrected to show that he was involuntarily discharged on
30 November 2002 under the provisions of Air Force Instruction 36-3209, and
retired effective 1 December 2002 under the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 8911, in the grade of colonel (0-6).
_______________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive
Session on 9 August 2007, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Michael K. Gallogly, Panel Chair
Ms. Terri G. Spoutz, Member
Ms. Sharon B. Seymour, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The following
documentary evidence for AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2007-01269 was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 18 Apr 07, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, ARPC/DPP, dtd 29 May 07, w/atch.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 1 Jun 07.
Exhibit E. Counsel’s Rebuttal, dated 24 Jul 07.
MICHAEL K. GALLOGLY
Panel Chair
AFBCMR BC-2007-01269
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force
Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section
1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, be corrected to show that he was
involuntarily released from active duty on 30 November 2002 under the
provisions of Air Force Instruction 36-3209, and retired effective 1
December 2002 under the provisions of Title 10, United States Code, Section
8911, in the grade of colonel (0-6).
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-01550
However, he and his MPF discovered that Air Reserve Personnel Center (ARPC) guidance as outlined in Air Force Instruction (AFI) 36-3209, Separation and Retirement Procedures for Air National Guard and Air Force Reserve Members, stipulates that in order to retire as a colonel he would have had to serve on AD status in the grade of colonel for at least three years in order to retire in the grade of colonel. 1370(a) wherein it is stated that officers who retire voluntarily “…must have served...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01089
His active duty (AD) service from 18 Jan 01 until 31 May 02, be credited as the highest grade held of lieutenant colonel. On 31 May 02, after 21 years and 18 days of active service, the applicant was released in the grade of major from AD and converted to a traditional Reserve status (IMA) on 1 Jun 02. Reserve Order BA-475, dated 4 Jun 02, ordered the applicant’s promotion to the Reserve grade of lieutenant colonel with a date of rank (DOR) of 18 Jan 01 and an effective date of 1 Jun 02,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012486
JFHQ - NY, NYARNG, Latham, NY, Orders 130-0002, dated 10 May 2013, announced the applicant's retirement from active duty effective 30 June 2013 and placement on the retired list in the rank of LTC (O-5) effective 1 July 2013. The applicant and his counsel contend that the applicant's records should be corrected to show he was involuntarily retired in the rank of COL (O-6) because he was not fully informed by NYARNG senior leadership or SMEs of the issues related to his redeployment that...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-02090
JAMES W. RUSSELL III Panel Chair Attachment: Ltr, ANG/A1PS, dtd 28 May 09, w/atch AFBCMR BC-2008-02090 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-01957
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS However, in accordance with 10 USC 12683 and AFI 36-3209, Separation and Retirement Procedures for Air National Guard and Air Force Reserve Members , he should have been discharged from ISLRS after three years, effective 2 Oct 01. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice to warrant correcting the applicant’s records to show that he was discharged from the Inactive Status List...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00685
On 3 Aug 10, the Vice Chief of Joint Staff signed an order amending the applicants separation from the ANG and transfer to the Air Force Reserve to reflect his discharge from the WYANG and as a Reserve of the Air Force effective 10 Oct 10, under the provisions of AFI 36-3209, para 2.25.2, ANG Unique Separations. In addition, no one had the authority to discharge the applicant from the Reserve of the Air Force (See SAF/IG Report at Exhibit B). According to AFI 36-3209, the authority to...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-00897
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice to warrant correcting the applicant’s records to show that he was discharged from the Inactive Status List Reserve Section (ISLRS) on 9 Apr 01. The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2010-00897 in Executive Session on 11 Jan 11, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03031
JA states that based on the facts presented in the NGB opinions, JA finds their responses to be legally sufficient and concurs with the recommendations to deny the applicant's requests for corrective action related to ACP payments, Board# V0611A, AGR separation from ANG Selective Retention Review Board (SRRB) consideration, and TERA. Counsels complete response is at Exhibit N. _______________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: NGB/A1PF...
The applicant was progressively promoted to the Reserve of the Air Force and Air National Guard grade of lieutenant colonel (O-5), with a promotion service date (PSD) of 11 Jan 87 and an effective date of 15 May 87. By ANG Special Order AP-124, dated 5 Jun 98, he was promoted to the Reserve of the Air Force and Air National Guard grade of colonel (O-6), with a PSD and effective date of 30 Jun 96. In the applicant’s case, as a colonel (O-6), he could have served to age 60 or 30 years of...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01235
Special Order AA-0430, dated 24 10 June 2005, indicates in paragraph 3, “NO TRAVEL AUTHORIZED.” The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibits B and C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPP recommends the applicant’s request be denied. DPP states according to the JFTR, members are...