RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-01082
INDEX CODE: 100.00
COUNSEL: NOT INDICATED
HEARING DESIRED: NO
MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 7 OCT 2008
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His records be corrected to show he elected to participate in the
Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB) Program rather than declining to participate in
the program.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He was checking his records and discovered he was not entitled to the MGIB.
He believes educational benefits are something everyone should be entitled
to, and was under the impression throughout his career that he was entitled
to educational benefits.
Applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant contracted his initial enlistment in the Regular Air Force on
4 September 1985, for a term of six years, and was progressively promoted
to the grade of master sergeant. His records reflect he declined
participation in the MGIB on 13 September 1985, via a DD Form 2366,
Veterans’ Educational Assistance Act of 1984.
On 25 April 2007, the applicant was informed that his records reflect he
elected to decline the MGIB and requested he provide documentation to
support a government error or injustice. (Exhibit B)
He retired in the grade of master sergeant on 1 September 2007.
________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPAT recommends denial. DPPAT states, in part, the applicant’s
request merits denial based on the Defense of Laches. In the interest of
justice, the applicant was asked to provide information that could support
a government error or injustice. His 11 June 2007, response did not
support a government error, but an ideological point of view.
The Defense of Laches denies relief to one who has unreasonably and
inexcusably delayed in asserting a claim. In this case, his declination
statement took effect over 20 years ago. His unreasonable delay has caused
prejudice to the Air Force through fading of memories or lack of witnesses
who can recall this specific event where the applicant elected to decline
MGIB participation.
In short, the Air Force asserts that the applicant’s unreasonable delay
regarding a matter dating back to 13 September 1985 greatly complicates the
ability to determine the merits of the applicant’s position. Approval
violates Title 38 U.S.C. Chapter 30.
The AFPC/DPPAT evaluation is at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The applicant states in part, although the advisory opinion states his
records reflect he declined participation in the MGIB, he does not recall
taking this action. However, thinking back over the last 21 years he can
understand why he and others would possibly decline the MGIB. Asking a 17
or 18 year old enlistee during a hectic and stressful time to make this
type of decision, while being pushed through basic training is an
injustice. He is aware of many individuals who declined the MGIB, but
later regretted that decision. All of whom stated, the time frame and the
pressures during basic training were not fair circumstances for them to be
forced to make such a vital decision.
The applicant’s complete response is at Exhibit E.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of
justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant's
complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree
with the opinions and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary
responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that
the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore,
in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no compelling basis to
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not
considered with this application.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2007-01082
in Executive Session on 18 September 2007, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Chair
Mr. Patrick C. Daugherty, Member
Mr. Joseph D. Yount, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 12 Mar 07, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant’s Master Personnel Records
Exhibit C. Memo, AFPC/DPPAT, dated 16 Jul 07.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 10 Aug 07.
Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, dated 11 Jun 07, w/atch.
THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01778
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-01778 INDEX CODE: 128.14 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY COMPLETION DATE: 8 NOVEMBER 2008 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 2336, Veteran's Educational Assistance Act of 1984 (GI Bill), completed and signed on 16 Jul 86 be amended to show that he enrolled in the GI Bill. He was told he did not need...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00246
The Deputy Chief of Staff, Manpower and Personnel, released an FY07 Force Shaping message outlining the voluntary separation pay (VSP) incentives which pays a lump sum payment to officers who voluntarily separate from active duty. The opportunity to participate or reverse a previous declination to participate in MGIB, if previously considered ineligible, is not authorized by the SecAF for those individuals who elect to separate voluntarily. We took notice of the applicant's complete...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03184
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She requested the monies paid in her behalf under the College Loan Repayment Program (CLRP) be refunded to the Air Force because her school closed. On 8 December 2006, AFPC/DPPAT requested the applicant provide documentation to support that the amount of $5,420 paid to her lending institution under the CLRP was, in fact, returned to the United States Treasury. There is no evidence to support the...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-03119
While it does appear that the applicant voluntarily signed the Montgomery GI Bill Statement of Disenrollment, the Board does not find it unreasonable that someone of his grade and time in the Air Force did not fully comprehend the impact of this action or that he mistakenly signed in the wrong block. As such, we believe that the applicant should be given the benefit of the doubt regarding his assertion that his disenrollment from the MGIB was unintentional. The following documentary...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02242
Public Law (PL) 101-689 was established to allow those servicemembers who entered active duty from 1 July 1985 through 30 June 1988, who declined participation in the MGIB upon entry on active duty, another opportunity to enroll during the open period. The evidence of record indicates the applicant was afforded the opportunity to enroll in the MGIB in 1985 and again in 1989 and declined participation on both occasions. Therefore, in view of the foregoing, and in the absence of...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-02380
A military record reflected the applicant’s grade as SSgt on 9 May 43; then as private on 22 Dec 43 with a temporary grade of CPL. They find no documentation in the available records concerning the applicant’s reduction from SSgt to CPL. While the reduction may have been warranted at the time, we are convinced, on the basis of clemency, that some consideration should be given to this applicant’s participation and personal sacrifice during WWII.
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00995
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-00995 INDEX CODE: 107.00 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NOT INDICATED XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 25 AUG 2006 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to show he was promoted to the grade of captain and he served on active duty from 24 February 1943 to 12...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00285
Applicant’s complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A. DPPAT states the applicant completed the DD Form 2366 correctly. Currently, there are no other provisions under 38 U.S.C., Chapter 30 that allow an individual to reverse their decision once they have declined MGIB participation The DPPAT complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant reviewed the evaluation and...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02310
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-02310 INDEX CODE: 110.02 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. On 18 January 2000, he received an LOR for failing to report to work on time. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03873
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-03873 INDEX NUMBER: 128.00 XXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXX-XX-XXXX HEARING DESIRED: No _____________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be made eligible for Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB) benefits. The law stipulates all MGIB- eligible individuals are automatically enrolled in the MGIB upon entering active duty and are given a one-time opportunity...