RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-00909
INDEX CODE: 111.00, 126.04
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: YES
MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: Sep 25, 2008
_______________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His enlisted performance report (EPR) ending 24 Jul 06 be voided and
expunged from his records and the suspension of his security clearance be
lifted.
_______________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He was a member of the Air Force Reserves since May 91 and recently
retired after 20 years of service.
The comments in his 2006 EPR were a sudden deviation from previous EPRs.
He was given an administrative demotion, but his EPR does not recognize
that the demotion referred was later reversed on appeal and it was
written while the legal issues were still extant.
In support of his request, applicant provided copies of EPRs, a copy of
his demotion notification letter, demotion orders, and letters reversing
his demotion with Special Orders attached.
The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_______________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 4 Aug 06, the applicant was notified of demotion actions for failure
to fulfill noncommissioned officer responsibilities. In addition, the
notification indicated that the applicant’s forgery of government
documents and misconduct resulted in the suspension of his access to
classified information/unescorted entry into restricted areas, and that
his security clearance had been suspended along with access to all
government systems to include network and e-mail access.
On 19 Nov 06, the applicant was demoted from technical sergeant (TSgt) to
the rank of staff sergeant (SSgt).
On 25 Feb 07, the applicant retired from the Air Force Reserves.
The applicant appealed his demotion and on 6 Mar 07, the appellate
authority, 22 AF/CC, approved the applicant’s request to restore his
previous grade of TSgt and the demotion order was revoked in its
entirety.
_______________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFRC/A1B recommends approval of the applicant’s request for expunging his
EPR with a closeout date of 24 Jul 06. Any actions taken to demote the
applicant from TSgt to SSgt were accomplished after the closeout date of
the EPR. The applicant submitted appeal documentation for the rank of
TSgt to be restored but before a recommendation could be made he retired
from the Air Force Reserves.
The ARPC/A1B complete evaluation is at Exhibit B.
AFCAF/PS has stated that after a review of the Joint Personnel
Adjudication System (JPAS), the applicant’s security clearance
eligibility is coded as “Loss of Jurisdiction,” not suspended. Loss of
jurisdiction means an individual no longer works in any capacity for the
Department of the Air Force; therefore, the Air Force no longer has
jurisdiction over his clearance eligibility.
Should the applicant seek future employment in a federal position that
requires a security clearance, the servicing adjudication facility would
be responsible for determining security clearance eligibility at that
time.
The AFCAF/PS complete evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_______________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 8
Jun 07 and 5 Sep 07 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D).
As of this date, this office has not received a response.
_______________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice warranting removal of the applicant’s EPR
closing 24 July 2006. As such, we agree with the Air Force office of
primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our
conclusion to grant this portion of the requested relief. Regarding the
applicant’s request concerning his security clearance, we concur with the
recommendation of AFCAF/PS and adopt its rationale as the basis for our
conclusion that when an individual no longer works in any capacity for
the Department of the Air Force, the Air Force no longer has jurisdiction
over their security clearance. Accordingly, it is recommended the record
be corrected as indicated below:
_______________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that the Enlisted Performance
Report (AB thru TSgt), AF IMT 910, rendered for the period 21 December
2004 through 24 July 2006 be, and hereby is, declared void and removed
from his records.
_______________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2007-00909
in Executive Session on 16 October 2007, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Mr. John B. Hennessey, Panel Chair
Ms. Dee R. Reardon, Member
Mr. Jeffery R. Shelton, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The following
documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, w/atch, dated 12 Mar 07.
Exhibit B. Memorandum, HQ AFRC/A1B, dated 4 Jun 07.
Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 8 Jun 07.
Exhibit D. Memorandum, AFCAF/PS, dated 14 Aug 07.
Exhibit E. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 5 Sep 07.
JOHN B. HENNESSEY
Panel Chair
AFBCMR BC-2007-00909
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force
Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of
Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is
directed:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the
Air Force relating to XXXXXXXXX, be corrected to show that the Enlisted
Performance Report (AB thru TSgt), AF IMT Form 910, rendered for the
period 21 December 2004 through 24 July 2006, be, and hereby is,
declared void and removed from his records.
JOE G.
LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force
Review Board Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00685
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPEP recommends denial of the applicant’s request to correct the period of report on the 28 Feb 06 EPR. As stated in AFI 36-2401, A1.5.17, “The Air Force does not require the designated rater to be your immediate supervisor. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant submitted a statement from his rater during the period...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01362
In July 1994, she enlisted in the Air Force Reserve (USAFR) and was assigned to the Security Police Squadron at Westover Air Reserve Base as an SSgt. While she kept her supervisor and squadron informed of her status, she was lax in that she did not follow through by submitting the proper paperwork that would have put her in an inactive status until her Expiration Term of Service (ETS) in July 2000. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00587
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-00587 INDEX CODE: 111.02 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 29 August 2007 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Enlisted Performance Report (EPR) rendered for the period 24 August 2004 through 1 July 2005 be expunged from his records. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/ DPPPEP,...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00155
Lastly, his supervisor and the assignment technician received Letters of Reprimand for their involvement in the PRP program; however, they did not receive referral EPRs. DPSIDEP states the EPR was not a referral report and it was processed in accordance with AFI 36-2401, Table 3.2, Rule 20, Disagreements, which states evaluators, should discuss disagreements when preparing reports. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2007-02503
________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/JA recommends relief, and states, in part; the applicant suffered a downgraded EPR due to lack of training and lack of response from her supervisors or chain of command. The evidence of record clearly establishes that she was not being properly trained and that her chain-of-command was derelict in training her. At the request of the applicant’s counsel, the DoD/IG reexamined the documentation...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02665
She closed with a statement that there was also a period of time she should have been on medical hold orders, and the fact that her security clearance was not restored until 1 November 2005. Evidence has been presented that during the period September 2004 until sometime in January 2006, her security clearance was improperly suspended and that precluded her from performing duty and earning retirement points. THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ Chair AFBCMR 2006-02665 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-04032
In support of his request, the applicant provided statements in his own behalf and copies of three EPRs ending 20 Jan 06, 29 Apr 05, and 15 Dec 06, respectively. However, after a thorough review, and since some doubt exists, DPSIDEP recommends the AFBCMR direct that for the EPR ending 20 Jan 06, Section VI, Line 6, remove the statement: “not ready for promotion.” The complete AFPC/DPSIDEP opinion is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02718
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02718 INDEX CODES: 100.05, 111.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 4 Mar 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: By amendment, his promotion eligibility be reinstated so his test scores for the 03E6 cycle can be graded; he receive promotion consideration for cycle 04E6; his training status code...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03754
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03754 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. The complete HQ USAF/A1PP evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSID recommends voiding the three contested EPRs,contingent upon the Board approving the applicants request to have his FA test results removed from his records. e. His effective date...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01709
In support of the application, the applicant submits copies of her Application for Correction/Removal of Evaluation Reports (AF Fm 948), the contested EPR, a Memo for Record, a Letter of Reprimand (LOR) and rebuttal, her child's medical records, a List of her Life Skills appointments, a Letter of Evaluation (LOE), and duty status reports. DPPPEP states the Evaluations Reports Appeals Board (ERAB) reviewed and denied the applicant's request on 24 Apr 06. While the applicant provided...