RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-00620
INDEX CODE: 111.02
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 1 September 2008
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His Enlisted Performance Report (EPR) rendered for the period 12 February
2003 through 11 February 2004 be changed from a promotion recommendation of
“4” (Ready) to “5” (Immediate Promotion).
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
His supervisor told him that if he continued to do well, he would receive a
“5” rating on his EPR. The rating of “4” received is unjust because he did
what he was told; he never received a Letter of Counseling or Letter of
Reprimand; his work was always completed on time; he was never late for
work or appointments; and he volunteered to help off duty organizations.
In support of his request, the applicant submits a copy of the contested
EPR.
The applicant’s complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant is currently serving on active duty in the grade of senior
airman (E-4) with a date of rank of 15 March 2003. He has a total active
military service date of 15 March 2000 and a projected date of separation
of 18 March 2009.
The following is a resume of the applicant’s EPR profile:
PERIOD ENDING PROMOTION RECOMMENDATION
11 Feb 02 4
11 Feb 03 4
11 Feb 04* 4
11 Feb 05 5
11 Feb 06 5
11 Feb 07 5
* Contested report
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPPEP recommends denial of the applicant’s request to change his EPR.
DPPPEP states the contested EPR was completed in direct compliance with
current regulation. An evaluation report is considered to represent the
rating chain’s best judgment at the time it is rendered. Once a report is
accepted for file, only strong evidence to the contrary warrants correction
or removal from an individual’s record. The burden of proof is on the
applicant. The applicant has not substantiated the contested report was
not rendered in good faith by all evaluators based on knowledge available
at the time.
DPPPEP states to effectively challenge an EPR, it is important to hear from
all the evaluators on the contested report — not only for support, but also
for clarification/explanation. In the absence of information from
evaluators, official substantiation of error or injustice from the
Inspector General or Military Equal opportunity is appropriate, but not
provided in this case.
The AFPC/DPPPEP evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 4 May
2007 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, this office
has received no response.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of an error or an injustice. We took notice of the applicant's
complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree
with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary
responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion
that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no
compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this
application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not
considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive
Session on 28 June 2007, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Ms. B. J. White-Olson, Panel Chair
Ms. Mary C. Puckett, Member
Ms. Patricia R. Collins, Member
The following documentary evidence for AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2007-00620
was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 28 Jan 07, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/DPPPEP, dated 11 Apr 07.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 4 May 07.
B. J. WHITE-OLSON
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00777
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-00777 INDEX CODE: 111.05 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY COMPLETION DATE: 14 OCTOBER 2008 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Enlisted Performance Report (EPR) for the period 30 Jul 2001 thru 29 Jul 2002 be amended or removed from his records. DPPPEP states the applicant did not file an appeal under the...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03817
The purpose of the feedback session is to give the ratee direction and to define performance expectations for the rating period in question. The complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant states the performance feedback work sheet is used to tell a ratee what is expected regarding duty performance and how well expectations are being met. After reviewing the documentation...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00890
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-00890 INDEX CODE: 111.02 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 23 SEPTEMBER 2008 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Officer Performance Report (OPR) rendered for the period 28 April 2003 through 1 February 2004 be removed from his records. The DPPPEP complete evaluation is at...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02414
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-02414 INDEX CODE: 111.02 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 15 FEB 2008 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His enlisted performance report closing 13 Sep 05 be voided. ___________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPPEP reviewed...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02413
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-02413 INDEX CODE: 111.02 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 15 FEB 2008 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His enlisted performance report (EPR) closing 15 Jul 05 rating of 3B be nullified. The applicant has not provided any statements from his rating chain nor official...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02532
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-02532 INDEX CODE: 111.02 XXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 26 FEB 2008 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His enlisted performance report closing 15 Jan 04 be voided. There may be occasions when feedback was not provided during a reporting period. A complete copy of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03969
In support of her request, the applicant submitted copies of an excerpt of AFI 36-2406; AFPC/DPMM memorandum dated 11 April 2006; Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records (AFBCMR) letter dated 16 December 2005; two Air Force Review Boards Agency (AFRBA) letters dated 16 December 2005; Evaluation Reports Appeal Board (ERAB) Decision; proposed EPR closing 14 January 2005; contested EPR closing 14 January 2005; Meritorious Service Medal documents; and EPR closing 14 January 2006 and...
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Chief, Inquiries/AFBCMR Section, Enlisted Promotions & Military Testing Branch, AFPC/DPPPWB, reviewed this application and stated the first time the contested report was considered in the promotion process was cycle 99E6 to Technical Sergeant. A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. The Chief, Performance Evaluation Section, Directorate of Personnel Program Management,...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00452
In support of his request, the applicant submits copies of his EPRs; performance feedback evaluations; awards and decorations; letters of support; leave and earnings statements; temporary duty (TDY) documentation; excerpts of Air Force Instruction (AFI) 36-2406; Application for Correction/Removal of Evaluation Reports and correspondence concerning supplemental board consideration. DPPPEP states a report is not erroneous or unfair because the applicant believes it contributed to a...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC200603533
The applicant filed an appeal under AFI 36-2401, Correcting Officer and Enlisted Evaluation Reports, which was denied by the Evaluation Report Appeals Board (ERAB). He is confident they will find significant and compelling evidence of a series of errors, injustices and unfair actions which resulted in the unjust EPR, and they will find sufficient justification to remove the unjust EPR from his record and grant him supplemental promotion consideration for promotion to Chief Master Sergeant...