RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-03791
INDEX CODE: 110.00
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: May 28, 2008
_____________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to
honorable.
_____________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
There is no error or unjust reason. He was informed at discharge, that
after a period of time, he could have his discharge certificate upgraded
to honorable.
He provided a copy of his DD Form 214, Report of Separation from Active
Duty.
The applicant's complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A.
_____________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The former member entered active duty on 28 Jan 76 and served for a period
of 1 year, 5 months, and 12 days.
The applicant was involved in a one vehicle accident involving alcohol on
26 Mar 77. He had two other passengers in the vehicle at the time of the
accident.
The applicant sustained injuries requiring eight days of hospitalization;
while the other passengers required one day.
A blood alcohol test (BAT) was conducted and the applicant was proven to
be legally intoxicated (.18%) and he was adjudged guilty of driving while
intoxicated on 11 Apr 77.
A formal line of duty determination was conducted after the accident and
found the applicant’s injuries not in the line of duty due to his own
misconduct (intoxication, excessive speed, and driver inattentiveness).
He was charged eight days lost time.
The applicant was given an Article 15 on 3 Oct 77 for willfully and
wrongfully damaging the left door of a fellow airman’s car. He received
forfeiture of $100 per month for two months and a suspended reduction to
airman basic.
The applicant was given an Article 15 on 25 Oct 77 for possessing
marijuana. He was reduced to the grade of airman and ordered to forfeit
$100 pay per month for two months. The applicant requested a suspended
reduction; however, he received an unsuspended reduction due to his
admitted heavy and continuous use of marijuana, and his voiced intentions
to continue this same level of usage.
The applicant’s commander notified him that he was recommending discharge
from the Air Force on 2 Nov 77. The commander recommended the applicant
receive a general (under honorable conditions) discharge for an apathetic
and defective attitude toward military authority and regulations. The
discharge authority approved the separation on 28 Nov 77 and directed the
applicant be discharged with a general (under honorable conditions)
discharge.
The applicant was discharged on 30 Nov 77 with a general (under honorable
conditions) discharge.
Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation
provided a copy of an Investigative Report, Number 471377LA0, which is at
Exhibit C.
_____________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPRS recommends denial. Based on the documentation on file in the
master personnel records (MPR), the discharge was consistent with the
substantive requirements of the discharge regulation. The discharge was
within the discretion of the discharge authority.
The applicant did not submit any evidence or identify any errors or
injustice that occurred in the discharge processing. He provided no facts
warranting a change to his general (under honorable conditions) discharge.
The AFPC/DPPRS complete evaluation is at Exhibit D.
_____________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 5 Jan
07 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, this office
has not received a response (Exhibit E).
_____________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest
of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant's
complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree
with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary
responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion
that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. In
addition, in view of the contents of the FBI Report of Investigation, we
are not persuaded that an upgrade of the characterization of the
applicant’s discharge is warranted on the basis of clemency. Therefore,
in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no compelling basis to
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.
_____________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only
be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence
not considered with this application.
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2006-03791
in Executive Session on 7 March 2007, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Ms. Cathlynn B. Novel, Panel Chair
Ms. Dee R. Reardon, Member
Mr. Jeffery R. Shelton, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered for Docket Number BC-
2006-03791:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, w/Atchs, 12 Dec 06.
Exhibit B. Applicant’s Military Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. FBI Report.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPPRS, dated 19 Dec 06.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 5 Jan 07.
CATHLYNN B. NOVEL
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02856
18405TA3, which is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPRS recommends the application be denied. DPPRS states that based upon the documentation in the file, they conclude that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and that the applicant did not identify any errors or injustices in the discharge processing. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03790
Applicant was discharged on 12 Jun 87, in the grade of airman basic (E-1), under the provisions of AFR 39-10, for Misconduct-Pattern of Minor Disciplinary Infractions, and received an under honorable conditions (general) discharge. Pursuant to the Board’s request on 24 Jan 07, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Clarksburg, West Virginia, provided a copy of an investigation report, which is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2007-00040
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-00040 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: Jul 13, 2008 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. The AFDRB reviewed all the evidence of record and concluded that the discharge was consistent with the...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03785
The applicant was discharged on 29 Mar 73. Other than his own assertions, the applicant has provided no evidence that would lead us to believe the actions taken to effect his discharge were improper, or that the information in his discharge case file is erroneous. Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 5 Jan 07; AFBCMR dated 26 Jan 07.
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02681
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-02681 INDEX CODE: 110.02 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 5 Mar 08 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The narrative reason (Misconduct-Drug Use) for his 1983 honorable discharge be removed from his DD Form 214. On 18 Nov 83, the applicant was notified of his commander’s intent...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2006-01846
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006- 01846 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 15 DECEMBER 2007 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under honorable conditions (general) discharge be upgraded to honorable. Novel, Panel Chair Mr. Gregory A. Parker, Member Ms. Jan Mulligan, Member The following documentary...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00131
On 12 Jan 78, the applicant amended his original conditional waiver and waived his rights associated with an administrative discharge board hearing contingent on his receipt of no less than a general discharge. Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 3 Feb 06. Exhibit F. Letter, Applicant, dated 7 Feb 06.
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03385
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-03385 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 5 MAY 2008 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under honorable conditions (general) discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge and change his reenlistment eligibility (RE) code. In regard to the RE code, the applicant has...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03944
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-03944 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY COMPLETION DATE: 30 JUNE 2008 ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His undesirable discharge be upgraded to general. On 13 Sep 54, the wing commander recommended the applicant’s request for discharge be accepted and he be separated with an...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03412
Based upon the documentation in the applicant's file, they believe his discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit F). After thoroughly reviewing the evidence or record, we find no evidence to show that the applicant’s discharge was erroneous or unjust.