Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2007-00040
Original file (BC-2007-00040.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-00040
            INDEX CODE:  110.02
            COUNSEL:  None
            HEARING DESIRED:  NO

MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: Jul 13, 2008

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His  general  (under  honorable  conditions)  discharge   be   upgraded   to
honorable.
_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

The record is not in error. He was a young, cocky, stupid kid  and  did  not
realize the financial repercussions of a  general  discharge  when  applying
for government or state jobs.

The discharge upgrade is for the financial welfare of his family.

His discharge has ruined excellent opportunities  for  employment  with  the
United States Post Office, state, and county jobs.

Future employment with the Orlando Utilities Commission  is  dependent  upon
an upgrade of his discharge.

He and his family have suffered the last 16 years and he realizes  how  much
money his irresponsible behavior has cost him.

In support of his request, the applicant has provided a copy of his DD  214,
Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty,  and  two  Notices  of
Rating Eligibility from the United States Postal Service.

The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant entered active duty Air Force on 22 Jun 90.  He served  for  a
period of 1 year, 5 months, and 6 days.

On or about 1 Mar 90,  he  received  a  Letter  of  Reprimand  for  underage
drinking and an unfavorable information file was established.

The applicant received an Article 15 on 3 May 91 for wrongfully operating  a
vehicle with a fictitious license plate.  He  received  forfeiture  of  $100
per month for one month and a suspended reduction to airman basic.

On 12 Jul 91, the applicant received a Letter of  Counseling  for  reporting
to work late.

On 26 Jul 91, he again failed to report to work on time  and  the  suspended
punishment from the prior Article 15 was vacated.

On 27 Sep 91, the applicant was involved in a motor vehicle  accident  which
was the result of him having an obstructed view  from  his  vehicle  and  he
made a left turn from the wrong lane causing him to hit a  person  riding  a
bicycle.  He was given a Letter of  Reprimand  and  discharge  actions  were
initiated.

On 16 Oct 91,  the  applicant  was  notified  he  was  not  recommended  for
promotion to E-2, airman.

The applicant was discharged with a  general  (under  honorable  conditions)
discharge on 27 Nov 91.

On 21 Sep 99, the applicant  submitted  an  application  to  the  Air  Force
Discharge Review Board (AFDBR).  The AFDRB  reviewed  all  the  evidence  of
record and concluded that the discharge was consistent with  the  procedural
and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within  the
discretion of the discharge authority and that the  applicant  was  provided
full administrative due process.  The Board  further  concluded  that  there
was no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of the discharge.

Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of  Investigation  (FBI)
provided a copy of an Investigative Report, Number 773860RA2,  which  is  at
Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPPRS recommends denial.  Based on the documentation  on  file  in  the
master personnel records  (MPR),  the  discharge  was  consistent  with  the
procedural and substantive requirements of the  discharge  regulation.   The
discharge was within the discretion of the discharge authority.

The applicant did  not  submit  any  evidence  or  identify  any  errors  or
injustices that occurred in the discharge processing.  He provided no  facts
warranting a change to his general (under honorable conditions) discharge.

The complete evaluation of AFPC/DPPRS is at Exhibit D.
_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 26  Jan
07 for review and comment within 30 days.  As of this date, this office  has
not received a response (Exhibit E).
_________________________________________________________________


THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided  by  existing  law  or
regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest  of
justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been  presented  to  demonstrate  the
existence of  error  or  injustice.   We  took  notice  of  the  applicant's
complete submission in judging the merits of the  case;  however,  we  agree
with the opinion and recommendation of  the  Air  Force  office  of  primary
responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion  that
the applicant has not  been  the  victim  of  an  error  or  injustice.   In
addition, in view of the contents of the FBI  Report  of  Investigation,  we
are  not  persuaded  that  an  upgrade  of  the  characterization   of   the
applicant’s discharge is warranted on the basis of clemency.  Therefore,  in
the absence of evidence to the contrary, we  find  no  compelling  basis  to
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.
_________________________________________________________________


THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented  did  not  demonstrate
the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the  application  was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only  be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant  evidence  not
considered with this application.

The following members of the Board considered  Docket  Number  BC-2007-00040
in Executive Session on 7 March 2007, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

      Ms. Cathlynn B. Novel, Panel Chair
      Ms. Dee R. Reardon, Member
      Mr. Jeffery R. Shelton, Member






The following documentary evidence was considered for Docket Number BC-2007-
00040:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 2 Jan 07.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  FBI Report.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, AFPC/DPPRS, dated 22 Jan 07.
    Exhibit E.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 26 Jan 07




                                   CATHLYNN B. NOVEL
                                   Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03791

    Original file (BC-2006-03791.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-03791 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: May 28, 2008 _____________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. He was informed at discharge, that after a period of time, he could have his discharge certificate upgraded to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03785

    Original file (BC-2006-03785.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant was discharged on 29 Mar 73. Other than his own assertions, the applicant has provided no evidence that would lead us to believe the actions taken to effect his discharge were improper, or that the information in his discharge case file is erroneous. Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 5 Jan 07; AFBCMR dated 26 Jan 07.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03790

    Original file (BC-2006-03790.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant was discharged on 12 Jun 87, in the grade of airman basic (E-1), under the provisions of AFR 39-10, for Misconduct-Pattern of Minor Disciplinary Infractions, and received an under honorable conditions (general) discharge. Pursuant to the Board’s request on 24 Jan 07, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Clarksburg, West Virginia, provided a copy of an investigation report, which is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03944

    Original file (BC-2006-03944.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-03944 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY COMPLETION DATE: 30 JUNE 2008 ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His undesirable discharge be upgraded to general. On 13 Sep 54, the wing commander recommended the applicant’s request for discharge be accepted and he be separated with an...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01430

    Original file (BC-2007-01430.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 6 Jul 06, the applicant appealed to the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) to have his general discharge upgraded to honorable. Based upon the documentation in the applicant's file, DPPRS believes his discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and the discharge was within the sound discretion of the discharge authority. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 3 Jul 07.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00040

    Original file (BC-2003-00040.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Most of the applicant’s records were destroyed in the Jul 73 fire at the National Personnel Records Center (NPRC). Pursuant to the Board's request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Washington, D.C., provided an investigative report, which is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPRS provided their rationale for...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03635

    Original file (BC-2006-03635.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    His punishment consisted of reduction in rank to the grade of airman basic (AB) (E-1) and restriction to the base for 60 days. On 11 February 1987, the applicant was notified of his commander’s intent to recommend him for discharge for misconduct under the authority of Air Force Regulation (AFR) 39-10, paragraph 5-47b and 5-49c, with a general discharge. The discharge authority directed the applicant be discharged without probation or rehabilitation with a general (under honorable...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03385

    Original file (BC-2006-03385.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-03385 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 5 MAY 2008 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under honorable conditions (general) discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge and change his reenlistment eligibility (RE) code. In regard to the RE code, the applicant has...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02856

    Original file (BC-2006-02856.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    18405TA3, which is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPRS recommends the application be denied. DPPRS states that based upon the documentation in the file, they conclude that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and that the applicant did not identify any errors or injustices in the discharge processing. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02454

    Original file (BC-2006-02454.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-02454 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 19 FEB 08 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to a general (under honorable conditions) or an honorable discharge. He provided no facts warranting an upgrade of...