RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-00040
INDEX CODE: 110.02
COUNSEL: None
HEARING DESIRED: NO
MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: Jul 13, 2008
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to
honorable.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
The record is not in error. He was a young, cocky, stupid kid and did not
realize the financial repercussions of a general discharge when applying
for government or state jobs.
The discharge upgrade is for the financial welfare of his family.
His discharge has ruined excellent opportunities for employment with the
United States Post Office, state, and county jobs.
Future employment with the Orlando Utilities Commission is dependent upon
an upgrade of his discharge.
He and his family have suffered the last 16 years and he realizes how much
money his irresponsible behavior has cost him.
In support of his request, the applicant has provided a copy of his DD 214,
Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, and two Notices of
Rating Eligibility from the United States Postal Service.
The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant entered active duty Air Force on 22 Jun 90. He served for a
period of 1 year, 5 months, and 6 days.
On or about 1 Mar 90, he received a Letter of Reprimand for underage
drinking and an unfavorable information file was established.
The applicant received an Article 15 on 3 May 91 for wrongfully operating a
vehicle with a fictitious license plate. He received forfeiture of $100
per month for one month and a suspended reduction to airman basic.
On 12 Jul 91, the applicant received a Letter of Counseling for reporting
to work late.
On 26 Jul 91, he again failed to report to work on time and the suspended
punishment from the prior Article 15 was vacated.
On 27 Sep 91, the applicant was involved in a motor vehicle accident which
was the result of him having an obstructed view from his vehicle and he
made a left turn from the wrong lane causing him to hit a person riding a
bicycle. He was given a Letter of Reprimand and discharge actions were
initiated.
On 16 Oct 91, the applicant was notified he was not recommended for
promotion to E-2, airman.
The applicant was discharged with a general (under honorable conditions)
discharge on 27 Nov 91.
On 21 Sep 99, the applicant submitted an application to the Air Force
Discharge Review Board (AFDBR). The AFDRB reviewed all the evidence of
record and concluded that the discharge was consistent with the procedural
and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the
discretion of the discharge authority and that the applicant was provided
full administrative due process. The Board further concluded that there
was no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of the discharge.
Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)
provided a copy of an Investigative Report, Number 773860RA2, which is at
Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPRS recommends denial. Based on the documentation on file in the
master personnel records (MPR), the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation. The
discharge was within the discretion of the discharge authority.
The applicant did not submit any evidence or identify any errors or
injustices that occurred in the discharge processing. He provided no facts
warranting a change to his general (under honorable conditions) discharge.
The complete evaluation of AFPC/DPPRS is at Exhibit D.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 26 Jan
07 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, this office has
not received a response (Exhibit E).
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of
justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant's
complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree
with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary
responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that
the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. In
addition, in view of the contents of the FBI Report of Investigation, we
are not persuaded that an upgrade of the characterization of the
applicant’s discharge is warranted on the basis of clemency. Therefore, in
the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no compelling basis to
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not
considered with this application.
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2007-00040
in Executive Session on 7 March 2007, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Ms. Cathlynn B. Novel, Panel Chair
Ms. Dee R. Reardon, Member
Mr. Jeffery R. Shelton, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered for Docket Number BC-2007-
00040:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 2 Jan 07.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. FBI Report.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPPRS, dated 22 Jan 07.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 26 Jan 07
CATHLYNN B. NOVEL
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03791
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-03791 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: May 28, 2008 _____________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. He was informed at discharge, that after a period of time, he could have his discharge certificate upgraded to...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03785
The applicant was discharged on 29 Mar 73. Other than his own assertions, the applicant has provided no evidence that would lead us to believe the actions taken to effect his discharge were improper, or that the information in his discharge case file is erroneous. Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 5 Jan 07; AFBCMR dated 26 Jan 07.
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03790
Applicant was discharged on 12 Jun 87, in the grade of airman basic (E-1), under the provisions of AFR 39-10, for Misconduct-Pattern of Minor Disciplinary Infractions, and received an under honorable conditions (general) discharge. Pursuant to the Board’s request on 24 Jan 07, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Clarksburg, West Virginia, provided a copy of an investigation report, which is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03944
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-03944 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY COMPLETION DATE: 30 JUNE 2008 ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His undesirable discharge be upgraded to general. On 13 Sep 54, the wing commander recommended the applicant’s request for discharge be accepted and he be separated with an...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01430
On 6 Jul 06, the applicant appealed to the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) to have his general discharge upgraded to honorable. Based upon the documentation in the applicant's file, DPPRS believes his discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and the discharge was within the sound discretion of the discharge authority. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 3 Jul 07.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00040
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Most of the applicant’s records were destroyed in the Jul 73 fire at the National Personnel Records Center (NPRC). Pursuant to the Board's request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Washington, D.C., provided an investigative report, which is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPRS provided their rationale for...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03635
His punishment consisted of reduction in rank to the grade of airman basic (AB) (E-1) and restriction to the base for 60 days. On 11 February 1987, the applicant was notified of his commander’s intent to recommend him for discharge for misconduct under the authority of Air Force Regulation (AFR) 39-10, paragraph 5-47b and 5-49c, with a general discharge. The discharge authority directed the applicant be discharged without probation or rehabilitation with a general (under honorable...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03385
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-03385 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 5 MAY 2008 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under honorable conditions (general) discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge and change his reenlistment eligibility (RE) code. In regard to the RE code, the applicant has...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02856
18405TA3, which is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPRS recommends the application be denied. DPPRS states that based upon the documentation in the file, they conclude that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and that the applicant did not identify any errors or injustices in the discharge processing. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02454
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-02454 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 19 FEB 08 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to a general (under honorable conditions) or an honorable discharge. He provided no facts warranting an upgrade of...