RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-03220
INDEX CODE: 100.00
XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 22 APRIL 2008
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His records be corrected to stop his participation in the Montgomery GI
Bill (MGIB) Program and he receive back pay for the MGIB deductions he has
paid.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He chose to receive MGIB benefits when he entered the service in May 2001.
He states the DD Form 2366, MGIB Act of 1984, he signed stated unless he
dis-enrolled from the MGIB program, his basic pay would be reduced for the
first twelve full months of active duty service. He made the election to
have the money taken out of his pay for the first 12 months and was under
the assumption the money was being taken. On 15 October 2006, he noticed
money had been taken from his account and the finance office indicated it
was to pay for the MGIB. He believes this money should have been taken
during his first twelve months of active duty as the contract states and
because of the unfortunate error he should not be required to repay the
money five years later. Additionally, based on his current financial
situation, he can not afford to have the money deducted from his pay. He
also states at this time, he does not need the MGIB because he is close to
receiving his CCAF degree.
In support of his request, the applicant submits a personal letter and a
copy of his DD Form 2366.
His complete submission with attachments is at Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Data extracted from the Military Personnel Data System reflect the
applicant contracted his initial enlistment in the Regular Air Force on 22
May 2001, and was progressively promoted to the grade of staff sergeant.
On 6 June 2001, he completed the DD Form 2366, indicating that he
understood that unless he disenrolled from the MGIB, his basic pay would be
reduced $100.00 per month for each of the first 12 full months of active
duty and this basic pay reduction could not be refunded, suspended or
stopped.
The All-Volunteer Force Education Assistance Program (38 U.S.C., Chapter
30), referred to as the MGIB, provides benefits for a variety of education
and training programs. The law stipulates that all MGIB-eligible
individuals are automatically enrolled in the MGIB upon entering active
duty and are given a one-time opportunity to disenroll should they desire
not to participate in the program. Eligible applicants may disenroll
within two weeks of entering active duty after a detailed lecture on
benefits. Disenrollment is done by signing a DD Form 2366.
________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ AFPC/DPPAT recommends denial. DPPAT states that assuming the purported
facts are correct, the Air Force failed to reduce the applicant’s basic pay
by $100.00 during his first 12 months. This resulted in an erroneous
overpayment of $1,200. DPPAT states the $1,200 must be collected from his
current basic pay as provided in the applicable laws. DPPAT states
according to all the evidence, he intended to enroll in the MGIB and thus,
constructively consented to the debt. In addition, he did not decline
participation in the MGIB, he never attempted to correct the error and
DPPAT believes no injustice has occurred considering he will be eligible
for $38,700 in benefits.
The AFPC/DPPAT evaluation is at Exhibit C.
HQ AFPC/JA reviewed the package for legal sufficiency and indicated there
were no legal issues pertaining to the Board for Correction of Military
Records; however, noted he alleges an involuntary pay deduction five years
after the erroneous pay was received with no apparent due process. JA
recommends he contact his military pay office if he believes he was not
properly notified of the reasons for the deductions and his associated
rights to request a waiver of the repayment.
The AFPC/JA legal evaluation is at Exhibit D.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 5
January 2007, for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, no
response has been received by this office.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice. Although the applicant initially elected
to participate in the MGIB program and have the money taken out of his pay
during the first 12 months of service, the Air Force neglected to deduct
the premiums in a timely manner and unexpectedly deducted payments from his
account five years later. This deduction appears to have created an undue
financial hardship for the applicant. While we note the Air Force's
recommendation to deny the applicant’s request based on the applicable law,
we also note the applicant has not used any of the MGIB benefits. As such,
in this particular case we believe approval of his request would be in the
best interest of the applicant and the Air Force. Therefore, we recommend
that his records be corrected to the extent indicated below.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating
to APPLICANT be corrected to show that, on 6 June 2001, he elected to
disenroll from the Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB) program.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2006-
03220 in Executive Session on 8 February 2007, under the provisions of AFI
36-2603:
Ms. Kathy L. Boockholdt, Panel Chair
Ms. Teri G. Spoutz, Member
Mr. Charlie E. Williams Jr., Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 16 October 2006.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPAT, dated 28 November 2006.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/JA, dated 21 December 2006.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 5 January 2007.
KATHY L. BOOCKHOLDT
Panel Chair
AFBCMR 2006-03220
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code,
and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the
provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for
Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to XXXXXXX, XXXXXXX, be corrected to show on 6 June 2001, he
elected to disenroll from the Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB) program.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
WASHINGTON DC
[pic]
Office of the Assistant Secretary
AFBCMR
1535 Command Drive EE Wing 3rd Floor
Andrews AFB, MD 20762-7002
XXXXXXX
XXXXXXX
XXXXXXX,
XXXXXXX
Reference your application submitted under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603 (Section 1552, 10 USC), AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2006-03220.
The Board determined that the military records should be corrected as
set forth in the attached copy of a Memorandum for the Chief of Staff
United States Air Force. The office responsible for making the correction
will inform you when your records have been changed.
After correction, the records will be reviewed to determine if you
are entitled to any monetary benefits as a result of the correction of
records. This determination is made by the Defense Finance and Accounting
Service (DFAS-DE), Denver, Colorado, and involves the assembly and careful
checking of finance records. It may also be necessary for the DFAS-DE to
communicate directly with you to obtain additional information to ensure
the proper settlement of your claim. Because of the number and complexity
of claims workload, you should expect some delay. We assure you, however,
that every effort will be made to conclude this matter at the earliest
practical date.
GREGORY E. JOHNSON
Chief Examiner
Air Force Board for Correction
of Military Records
Attachment:
1. Record of Proceedings
2. Copy of Directive
3. Customer Survey
cc:
DFAS-DE
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01175
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-01175 INDEX CODE: 100.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 20 OCTOBER 2007 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be reimbursed $900 for contributions paid on her Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB). The AFPC/JA evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPAT recommends denial. We took notice of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03000C
It appears the applicant intended not to participate in the MGIB Program, and instead enrolled in the College Loan Repayment Program (CLRP) as part of his enlistment contract to pay existing student loans. The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 26 Sep 06, w/atchs. Patricia J. Zarodkiewicz Vice Chair AFBCMR BC-2006-03000 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03471
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-03471 INDEX CODE: COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to participate in the Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB) program. His records reflect his decision to disenroll from the MGIB. After serving over five years and paying the required $1200, the Air Force states that he elected not to...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01930
DPPAT states that the law stipulates all MGIB eligible individuals are automatically enrolled in the MGIB upon entering active duty and are given a one- time opportunity to disenroll should they desire not to participate in the program. The information provided to the applicant during the MGIB briefing and BTES is correct in that TA will pay for a master’s degree. The HQ AFPC/DPPAT evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | bc-2006-01190
She told them she wanted to sign up for the MGIB so they crossed out the decline section on her DD Form 2366 and had her initial next to it and told her the money would begin coming out of her account. AFPC/DPPAT complete evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 4 August 2006 for review and comment within 30...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03184
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She requested the monies paid in her behalf under the College Loan Repayment Program (CLRP) be refunded to the Air Force because her school closed. On 8 December 2006, AFPC/DPPAT requested the applicant provide documentation to support that the amount of $5,420 paid to her lending institution under the CLRP was, in fact, returned to the United States Treasury. There is no evidence to support the...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01879
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPAT recommends the applicant’s record be corrected to show that he elected to participate in the MGIB program via DD Form 2337 prior to separation and that a service unique statement be included requiring the applicant to make the $1,200 payment as required by public law. Although it appears the applicant was not properly counseled regarding his MGIB entitlement at the time of discharge, we do...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01533
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant initially entered active duty in the Air Force as an enlisted member in 1988. Although his pay problems were resolved before any money would have been deducted from his pay, the majority of the Board finds his decision at the time reasonable, given the uncertainty he had about his pay account. The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 30 Apr 04, w/atchs.
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00285
Applicant’s complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A. DPPAT states the applicant completed the DD Form 2366 correctly. Currently, there are no other provisions under 38 U.S.C., Chapter 30 that allow an individual to reverse their decision once they have declined MGIB participation The DPPAT complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant reviewed the evaluation and...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00066
___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His security forces commander assured him that he would have educational benefits under the (MGIB). They provided no recommendation. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D).