Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03782
Original file (BC-2006-03782.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2006-03782
            INDEX CODE:  110.00

            COUNSEL:  NONE

            HEARING DESIRED:  NO

MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE:  16 JUN 08

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His general  (under  honorable  conditions)  discharge  be  upgraded  to  an
honorable discharge.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He desires his discharge upgraded.  He  states  his  record  was  impeccable
with high performance reports and decorations.

In support of his request, the applicant  provided  documentation  extracted
from his military personnel record.

Applicant’s complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

Applicant with 13 years, 2 months, and 8 days of active service,  served  as
a telecommunications operator technician.  On 18 April 1985,  applicant  was
notified by his commander of his intent to recommend that he  be  discharged
from the Air Force under  the  provisions  of  AFR  39-10,  paragraph  5-49C
(Misconduct – Drug Abuse).  The specific reason  for  this  action  was  his
wrongful use of marijuana on or about 1 February  1985  as  evidenced  by  a
positive urinalysis pursuant to an inspection, resulting in an  Article  15.
He was advised of his rights in this matter and acknowledged receipt of  the
notification on that same  date.   The  applicant  waived  his  right  to  a
hearing before an administrative  discharge  board  and  elected  to  submit
statements on his own behalf.  On 29 May 1985, the  applicant  submitted  an
unconditional waiver.  He requested that he  receive  a  general  discharge.
In a legal review of the case file, the acting staff  judge  advocate  found
the case legally sufficient and  recommended  the  unconditional  waiver  be
accepted and  that  he  be  discharged  with  a  general  discharge  without
probation and rehabilitation.  On  21 June  1985,  the  discharge  authority
concurred with the recommendations and directed that he be  discharged  with
a general discharge.  Applicant was discharged on 26 June 1985.

Pursuant to the Board's request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation  (FBI),
Clarksburg, West Virginia, provided an arrest record which is at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPPRS recommends denial.  DPPRS states based on  the  documentation  on
file in the master personnel records the discharge was consistent  with  the
procedural and substantive requirements of the  discharge  regulation.   The
discharge was within the discretion of the discharge  authority.   Applicant
did not submit any evidence  or  identify  any  errors  or  injustices  that
occurred in the discharge processing.  He provided  no  facts  warranting  a
change to his under honorable conditions (general) discharge.

The DPPRS complete evaluation is at Exhibit D.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

The applicant reviewed  the  evaluation  and  states  during  the  discharge
processing he was informed  by  counsel  that  if  he  did  not  accept  the
reduction in grade and the general discharge that he could have  received  a
more severe punishment by the discharge  board.   He  feels  that  this  was
coercion.  It has been 20 years since his discharge  and  he  is  seeking  a
position as a probation officer and desires his discharge upgraded.

Applicant’s complete response, with attachments, is at Exhibit F.

On 1 February 2007, a copy of the FBI Report of Investigation was  forwarded
to the applicant for review and response within 14 days (Exhibit G).  As  of
this date, no response has been received by this office.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.    The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing  law  or
regulations.

2.    The application was not timely filed; however, it is in  the  interest
of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.    Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to  demonstrate  the
existence of an  error  or  injustice.   We  believe  responsible  officials
applied appropriate standards in effecting his separation, and do  not  find
persuasive evidence that pertinent regulations were  violated  or  that  the
applicant was not afforded all the rights to which entitled at the  time  of
discharge.   It  appears  the  discharge   proceedings   were   proper   and
characterization  of  the  discharge  was  appropriate   to   the   existing
circumstances.   Although  the  applicant  did  not   specifically   request
consideration based on clemency, we find insufficient evidence to warrant  a
recommendation that the characterization of  the  applicant’s  discharge  be
upgraded on that basis.  In this respect, we note the  applicant’s  apparent
misconduct  following  his  discharge,  as  indicated  on  the  FBI  report.
Therefore,  in  the  absence  of  evidence  to  the  contrary,  we  find  no
compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented  did  not  demonstrate  the
existence of an error or injustice; the application  was  denied  without  a
personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon  the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not  considered  with  this
application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number  BC-2006-
03782 in Executive Session on 28 February 2007, under the provisions of  AFI
36-2603:

                 Mr. Jay H. Jordan, Panel Chair
                 Mr. James A. Wolffe, Member
                 Ms. Barbara R. Murray, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

   Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 5 Dec 06, w/atch.
   Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
   Exhibit C.  FBI Report of Investigation.
   Exhibit D.  Letter, AFPC/DPPRS, dated 20 Dec 06
   Exhibit E.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 5 Jan 07.
   Exhibit F.  Letter, Applicant, undated.
   Exhibit G.  Letter, SAF/MRBC, dated 1 Feb 07.




                 JAY H. JORDAN
                 Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03919

    Original file (BC-2006-03919.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-03919 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 25 JUN 08 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. The discharge authority concurred with the recommendations and directed that he be discharged with...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02377

    Original file (BC-2006-02377.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 9 December 1981, the discharge authority directed that the applicant be discharged from the Air Force under the provisions of AFM 39-12, paragraph 2-78, for the good of the service, with a type of discharge as under other than honorable conditions. On 20 February 2007, a letter was forwarded to applicant suggesting that he consider providing evidence pertaining to his post-service activities. Exhibit C. FBI Identification Record Number 234583W5, dated 9 Feb 07.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00882

    Original file (BC-2006-00882.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 4 Feb 82, in a Waiver of Disposition Board Proceedings, the applicant voluntarily indicated he no longer wished to participate in the 3320th Correction and Rehabilitation Squadron (CRS) Program at Lowry AFB, CO. On 4 Mar 82, the 3320 CRS commander notified the applicant he was recommending a general discharge for failure to complete the Rehabilitation Program and because of evidence of misconduct documented in the applicant’s military record. After 2 years, 10 months, and 15 days of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-1985-00820

    Original file (BC-1985-00820.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    He received the Air Force Commendation Medal and he was selected for junior officer of the month three times while stationed at the Air University. DPPRS further states that the applicant has not provided any new evidence or identified any errors or injustices that occurred in the discharge processing. The DPPRS complete evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00909

    Original file (BC-2006-00909.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 21 Mar 74, the applicant received nonjudicial punishment in the form of forfeiture of $50.00, 15 days of extra duty, and a reduction in grade from airman to airman basic suspended until 15 Sep 74, for disobeying a lawful order not to have visits of the opposite sex in dorm rooms from 2300 to 1000 hours, on or about 13 Mar 74. On 15 Oct 74, the applicant received nonjudicial punishment in the form of $100.00 forfeiture for disobeying a lawful order not to depart the team after lights out...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02024

    Original file (BC-2003-02024.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-02024 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. He was told by the Air Force that his discharge would be upgraded to honorable in six months. Therefore, based on the information and evidence provided they recommend...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03830

    Original file (BC-2006-03830.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 10 October 1978, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) considered and denied the applicant’s request that his undesirable discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. Applicant’s complete response is at Exhibit F. On 6 February 2007, a copy of the FBI Report of Investigation was forwarded to the applicant for review and response within 14 days (Exhibit G). As of this date, no response has been received by this office.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00933

    Original file (BC-2005-00933.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-00933 INDEX CODE: 106.00 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: Yes MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 19 Sep 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His 1985 general discharge be upgraded to honorable. On 6 Nov 85, the commander recommended the applicant be separated with a general discharge for drug abuse. Accordingly, we recommend...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-02253

    Original file (BC-2007-02253.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-02253 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 19 JAN 2009 ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His characterization of service be upgraded from general (under honorable conditions) to honorable. On 26 April 1985, he was notified of his commander's intent to recommend him for a...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01296

    Original file (BC-2005-01296.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The commander indicated in his recommendation for discharge action that before recommending the discharge, the applicant was counseled formally by the squadron staff and social actions personnel. On 10 May 2005, the Board staff requested the applicant provide post- service documentation within 20 days (Exhibit F). Although the applicant did not specifically request consideration based on clemency, we also find insufficient evidence to warrant a recommendation that the discharge be upgraded...