RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-00275
INDEX CODE: 124.00
XXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 30 JUL 2008
___________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active
Duty, dated 31 Jul 05, Item 17, be changed to “No” rather than
“Yes.”
___________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
Six days prior to out-processing the base, he visited the dentist
after 15 days for symptoms of pressure sensitivity on his left side
and the dentist made some corrections. He was advised, if he had
problems after retirement the Veterans Affairs (VA) would correct
the problem as long as he applied within 90 days of his retirement.
Applicant states the VA will not consider his case with Line 17 of
his DD Form 214 marked “Yes.”
In support of his appeal, applicant submitted a personal statement
and extracts of his Dental Record.
Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
___________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Applicant entered active duty on 30 Jul 85 and had continuous
honorable service until his retirement effective 1 Aug 05. He was
progressively promoted to the rank of staff sergeant with an
effective date and date of rank of 1 Nov 01. He was credited with
20 years and 1 day of active duty service.
DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty,
dated 31 Jul 05, Item 17, “Member was provided complete dental
examination and all appropriate dental services and treatment
within 90 days prior to separation,” is listed as “Yes.”
___________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The BCMR Medical Consultant reviewed this application and
recommended denial. A review of dental records indicate that an
examination and all appropriated dental services and treatment were
done within 90 days of separation. Following the 10 May 05, dental
appointment, the applicant remained in the area for 20 more days
and did not seek dental care for any recurrent problems. He was
also still in an active status until 31 Jul 05, an additional 60
days after he departed the local area and was eligible to seek
urgent dental services from the closest Air Force (or military)
dental clinic. Since he did not return during this time, it
appears that there were no further problems prior to his date of
retirement. New problems following retirement would not
necessarily be linked to treatment or no treatment provided while
on active duty. The preponderance of evidence and review of the
case with Air Force dental authorities indicates that action and
disposition in this case are proper and equitable reflecting
compliance with Air Force directives that implement the law.
A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C.
___________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Applicant disagrees with the BCMR Medical Advisor’s recommendation
and further explained the circumstances surrounding his dental
treatment prior to and after his 1 Aug 05 retirement. He believes
the symptoms he experienced after separation were due to dental
treatments he received prior to his retirement.
In support of his response, applicant provided a copy of his dental
treatment, dated 8 Nov 06.
Applicant’s complete response, with attachments, is at Exhibit E.
___________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. Applicant
contends that all appropriate dental treatment and services were
not completed within 90 days prior to retirement. We note the
applicant had several dental treatments and services in the months
of March, April and May 05. However, it appears that there were no
recurrent problems prior to his date of retirement. The
applicant’s case has undergone an exhaustive review by the AFBCMR
Medical Consultant and we found no evidence, including the
documents submitted in the applicant’s behalf, which would overcome
his assessment of the case. We therefore agree with the opinion
and recommendation of the AFBCMR Medical Consultant and adopt the
rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the
applicant has failed to sustain his burden of having suffered
either an error or injustice. Hence, in the absence of evidence to
the contrary, we find no compelling basis to recommend granting the
relief sought in this application.
___________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
___________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number
BC-2006-00275 in Executive Session on 1 February 2007, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Ms. Cathlynn B. Novel, Panel Chair
Mr. Don H. Kendrick, Member
Ms. Maureen B. Higgins, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 18 Jan 06, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFBCMR Medical Consultant, dated 26 Dec 06.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 8 Dec 06.
Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, dated 5 Jan 06, w/atchs.
CATHLYNN B. NOVEL
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2006-00275
DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, dated 31 Jul 05, Item 17, “Member was provided complete dental examination and all appropriate dental services and treatment within 90 days prior to separation,” is listed as “Yes.” ___________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant reviewed this application and recommended denial. In support of his response, applicant provided a copy of his dental treatment,...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2005-03332
The memorandum present in the applicant’s personnel file indicates that an examination and appropriate services and treatment were accomplished within 90 days of retirement. ___________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that his DD Form 214, dated 31 Aug 05, be corrected to reflect in Item 17, Member was provided complete dental...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01784
The BCMR Medical Consultant states the applicant contends he did not experience depression prior to entering the service, but the only medical documentation available for review clearly reports a history of depressive symptoms for several years prior to entering military service. While the episode of depression leading to discharge began while on active duty, the reported pre-service history of depressive symptoms is consistent with recurrent depressive disorder and is reinforced by the...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2004-03138
The applicant was honorably released from the Air Force on 5 September 2004 under the provisions of AFI 36-3208 (Completion of Required Active Service). _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant states the Service dental record indicates that the applicant received all appropriate dental services within 90 days prior to separation. _________________________________________________________________ The following...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-04086
Dental records reflect that the applicant received a complete dental examination and all appropriate dental services and treatment within 90 days prior to separation. BCMR Medical Consultant complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 18 April 2003, for review and comment within 30 days. After a thorough review...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02179
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02179 INDEX CODE: 108.01, 110.02, 131.00 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 17 JAN 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be promoted to the grade of staff sergeant (SSgt) with all back pay and allowances, and her 1989 discharge for pregnancy be changed to a medical discharge for multiple...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03360
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-03360 INDEX CODE: 100.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect that he was not provided a complete dental examination and all appropriate dental services and treatment within 90 days prior...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03297
In support of her request, the applicant provided a Mental Health Evaluation, dated 28 Jun 06, from the Life Skills Support Center, 90 MDOS/SGOH, F.E. Warren AFB, WY, recommending a waiver for reenlistment because her adjustment disorder had resolved and “there was no evidence of a mental health condition or a personality disorder at this time.” The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. As personality disorders are frequently exacerbated by stress, they may...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02389
Applicant states he did not receive urgent, timely treatment and medical care to correct his right shoulder and neck condition. The complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In his response to the Air Force evaluation, the applicant states he has discovered errors in the BCMR Medical Consultant’s assessment of the facts and is providing additional documentation to support his request. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00010
Although we find the applicant's actions which led to award of the Airman's Medal and two DFCs for his acts of heroism to be truly commendable, we find no evidence of either an error or an injustice in this case. In this regard, we note that the SAFPC considered the aforementioned decorations for award of an additional 10 percent in retired pay and found that, while heroic, his actions did not measure up to the standard required for an "extraordinary" determination. Novel, Member The...