ADDENDUM TO
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-03582-2
INDEX CODE: 110.02
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22, Report of Separation and Record of
Service, be changed by removing the comment Medically Disqualified, his
Separation Program Designator (SPD) Code be changed, and his Reenlistment
Eligibility be changed to Eligible rather than Ineligible.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS
On 11 July 2006, the applicant's request to change his records was
considered and denied by the Board. For an accounting of the facts and
circumstances surrounding the applicant’s request, and, the rationale of
the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings at Exhibit
E.
On 14 March 2007, he submitted a request for reconsideration contending his
assertions he has been symptom and medicine free for over four and one-half
years will have to be accepted “AS IS” (emphasis applicant) from both
himself and his doctor. He does not know how otherwise to prove he is not
taking any medication.
The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit F.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
After again reviewing this application and the evidence provided in support
of his appeal, we remain unpersuaded the applicant’s NGB Form 22 should be
changed to reflect those entries he has identified as being in error. We
carefully considered the statements provided by the applicant and while we
believe the evidence to be new and relevant, we feel it is not of such
significance as to alter our original decision. Therefore, in the absence
of evidence to the contrary, the Board finds no compelling basis to
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the existence of probable material error or injustice; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive
Session on 19 April 2007, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Chair
Ms. Mary C. Puckett, Member
Ms. Josephine L. Davis, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit E. Record of Proceedings, dated 20 Jul 2006,
with exhibits A through D.
Exhibit F. Applicant’s Letter, Undated.
THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-01940
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-01940 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Block 26, Reenlistment Eligibility, of his NGB Form 22, Report of Separation and Record of Service, be changed to read “Eligible”, rather than “Ineligible.” _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02983
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-02983 INDEX CODE: 100.06 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 2C be changed to 1C allowing him the opportunity to reenlist. A1POF states he was discharged from the DEANG as a result of an Air Force Evaluation Report of his BMT experience and...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02719
On 27 December 1983, he was honorably discharged from the Maryland Air National Guard for Expiration Term of Service (ETS) after having served for 16 years and 6 months. After a review of the evidence of record and applicant's submission, we are not persuaded that his uncorroborated assertion he was discharged for being six pounds overweight, in and by itself, sufficiently persuasive to override the rationale provided by the Air National Guard. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 31 Mar 06.
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02652
On 21 February 1992, the LOD determination was approved. The complete A1PS evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant responded stating his injuries occurred during Desert Storm while delivering bullets and minesweepers in and out of the combat zone. He provided letters from eyewitnesses who were with him when he first injured his back and re-injured his left knee.
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03384
A copy of the report was provided to the applicant for review and response within 30 days. By letter, dated 29 January 2007, it was requested that the applicant provide evidence pertaining to his post-service activities. His complete response, with attachments, is at Exhibit D. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1.
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02632
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 4 June 1985. Between 4 June 1989 and 3 June 1992 his record indicates service with a Reserve component where he accumulated three satisfactory years of service towards a Reserve retirement – part of which the record shows was spent in the CAANG. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-00693
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-00693 INDEX CODE: 100.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be changed to show her name as “Catherine”, and her NGB Form 22, Report of Separation and Record of Service, be changed in block 8a, Station or Installation at...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01376
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-01376 INDEX CODE: 107.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 7 NOVEMBER 2007 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to show he was awarded the Air Force Commendation Medal (AFCM) with one oak leaf cluster (1OLC) and the Korean Defense Service Medal (KDSM) and the...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03913
Therefore, he should have been promoted via the Reserve Office Promotion Act (ROPMA) in 1999, his seventh year of time in grade (TIG) as a captain. A1POF states he was, in fact, considered by the fiscal year 2000 (FY00) Air National Guard Major mandatory promotion board and was not selected making him a once-deferred officer. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air National...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03762
The Secretary of the Air Force (SECAF) approved his request on 2 May 2005. He submitted two letter’s of Indispensability to NGB and SECAF. ______________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that he was retired from the Air National Guard effective 1 January 2005 rather than 1 June 2005.