RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-01940
INDEX CODE: 110.02
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
Block 26, Reenlistment Eligibility, of his NGB Form 22, Report of
Separation and Record of Service, be changed to read “Eligible”,
rather than “Ineligible.”
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He was told he could reenlist upon waiting for six months after his
discharge. He would like to be eligible to reenlist.
In support of his appeal, the applicant has provided copies of his NGB
Form 22 and his discharge order.
Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Applicant enlisted in the Kansas Air National Guard (KSANG) on
14 August 2002 in the grade of airman first class. On 11 September
2003, his commander notified him of his intent to discharge him for
Entry Level Performance & Conduct for his inability to complete Basic
Military Training (BMT) due to a medical condition. On 6 November
2003, he was discharged with an Entry Level Separation as he had
served less than six months of active duty.
Examiner’s Note: Applicant was separated in accordance with AFI 36-
3209, Separation and Retirement Procedures for Air National Guard and
Air Force Reserve Members, paragraph 3.16.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
None provided.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law
or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of error or injustice. We took notice of the
applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case
including his uncorroborated statement he was told he could reenlist
after six months; however, the discharge appears to be in compliance
with the governing AFI and we find no evidence to indicate that his
separation from the Air Force was inappropriate. We find no evidence
of error in this case and after thoroughly reviewing the documentation
that has been submitted in support of applicant's appeal, we do not
believe he has suffered from an injustice. Therefore, based on the
available evidence of record, we find no basis upon which to favorably
consider this application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-
2006-01940 in Executive Session on 18 July 2007, under the provisions
of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Chair
Ms. Barbara R. Murray, Member
Mr. Richard K. Hartley, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 18 May 06, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02719
On 27 December 1983, he was honorably discharged from the Maryland Air National Guard for Expiration Term of Service (ETS) after having served for 16 years and 6 months. After a review of the evidence of record and applicant's submission, we are not persuaded that his uncorroborated assertion he was discharged for being six pounds overweight, in and by itself, sufficiently persuasive to override the rationale provided by the Air National Guard. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 31 Mar 06.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02395
Applicant’s NGB Form 22, Report of Separation and Record of Service, reflects that he received a general discharge on 31 May 2000 under the provisions of AFI 36-3209, para 3.21.3.2 (Misconduct - Drug Abuse). _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ANG/DPFP recommends denial. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air National Guard...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2002-02395
Applicant’s NGB Form 22, Report of Separation and Record of Service, reflects that he received a general discharge on 31 May 2000 under the provisions of AFI 36-3209, para 3.21.3.2 (Misconduct - Drug Abuse). _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ANG/DPFP recommends denial. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air National Guard...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02983
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-02983 INDEX CODE: 100.06 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 2C be changed to 1C allowing him the opportunity to reenlist. A1POF states he was discharged from the DEANG as a result of an Air Force Evaluation Report of his BMT experience and...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03091
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-03091 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed to one that would enable him to reenlist. At the time members are separated from the Air Force, they are furnished an RE code predicated upon the quality of their service and...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01371
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01371 INDEX CODE: 110.03 COUNSEL: HARRY KONST HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His record be corrected to reflect 20 years of active duty service, a subsequent active duty retirement, and a pilot bonus he would have received had he been selected for any one of several positions he had applied for but...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02632
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 4 June 1985. Between 4 June 1989 and 3 June 1992 his record indicates service with a Reserve component where he accumulated three satisfactory years of service towards a Reserve retirement – part of which the record shows was spent in the CAANG. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2005-03582-2
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS On 11 July 2006, the applicant's request to change his records was considered and denied by the Board. He does not know how otherwise to prove he is not taking any medication. The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit F. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: After again reviewing this application and the evidence provided in...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01317
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005- 01317 INDEX CODE: 100.06, 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 21 OCTOBER 2006 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code be changed from “3A” to “1” to permit reentry into the military without a waiver. On 15 Jan 05, applicant was honorably released from...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00688
The Air Force accepted him and he should receive an honorable discharge. On 26 Dec 02, the commander notified the applicant of his intent to recommend entry-level separation for erroneous enlistment based on the discovery of the pilonidal cyst. A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C. HQ AFPC/DPPRS notes that had the Air Force known of the applicant’s EPTS pilonidal cyst, he would not have been allowed to enlist.