ADDENDUM TO
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01584
INDEX NUMBER: 100.00
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
___________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
In her request for reconsideration, applicant requests that any
references to drug abuse be expunged from her records and that her
Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code be changed from “2C” to “1C” to
permit reentry into the military.
___________________________________________________________________
RESUME OF CASE:
On 3 August 2005, the Board considered and denied the applicant’s
request that any references to drug abuse be expunged from her
records and that her RE code be changed from “2C” to “1C”. The
Board further noted in view of the short period of time that has
passed since the applicant’s discharge, they were not inclinded to
consider an upgrade of her reenlistment code on the basis of
clemency at the time. However, they stated after a period of at
least 24 months, the Board may be willing to reconsider the
applicant’s appeal on the basis of clemency and at that time the
applicant should provide evidence of her activities since leaving
the service. For an accounting of the facts and circumstances
surrounding the application, and the rationale of the earlier
decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings (ROP) at
Exhibit E.
___________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
After careful consideration of applicant’s most recent submission,
the Board is not persuaded that an upgrade of the applicant’s
reenlistment eligibility code is warranted at this time. The Board
does not feel that a sufficient amount of time has elapsed since
the applicant’s intial appeal to the Board. It appears there may
have been some confusion on the applicant’s part regarding the
Board’s previous determination. The intent of the Board was that
they would be willing to reconsider the applicant’s appeal on the
basis of clemency, after a period of 24 months has passed since her
original application to the Board. In view of this, the Board
concludes that the applicant’s request be denied at this time, and
that she should resubmit her appeal to the Board after 15 August
2007.
___________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
___________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2005-
01584 in Executive Session on 19 December 2006, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Ms. Rita S. Looney, Panel Chair
Ms. Barbara R. Murray, Member
Mr. James A. Wolffe, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit E. Record of Proceedings, dated 22 Aug 05,
W/exhibits A through D.
Exhibit F. Applicant's Letter, dated 20 Nov 06.
RITA S. LOONEY
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01584
On 16 Nov 04, applicant certified she had not used any drug, including marijuana, since she originally completed the AF Form 2030. The discharge authority approved the discharge and directed that applicant be discharged with an uncharacterized entry-level separation. ___________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2005- 01584 in Executive Session on 3 August 2005, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: Ms....
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02519
Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. Airmen are given entry-level separation/uncharacterized service characterization when separation is initiated in the first 180 days of continuous active service. _________________________________________________________________ RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD: The majority of the Board finds insufficient evidence of error or injustice and recommends the application be denied.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00751
In support of his appeal, applicant submitted a personal statement and letters of character references from family members and friends. ___________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The AFBCMR Medical Consultant states that the applicant was discharged on 4 Aug 98, after 1 month and 11 days on active duty, due to existing prior to service post traumatic stress disorder. He was administratively discharged during basic training with an entry level...
The Consultant recommends that the narrative reason be changed to “Conditions that Interfere with Military Service, Mental Disorders,” leaving her SPD and RE codes unchanged. Ms. Looney voted to deny and has submitted a Minority Report, which is at Exhibit F. The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 28 Dec 00, w/atchs. RITA S. LOONEY Panel Chair AFBCMR 01-00064 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2004-01344A
Ms. Looney voted to grant the applicant’s requests and submitted a minority report at Exhibit P. The following additional documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit G. Record of Proceeding, w/atchs, dated 17 Aug 04. Exhibit P. Minority Report RITA S. LOONEY Panel Chair MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS (AFBCMR) SUBJECT: AFBCMR Application of XXXXXXX, BC-2004-01344 The Board majority has accepted the recommendation of AFLSA/JAJM to...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2004-01344A
Ms. Looney voted to grant the applicant’s requests and submitted a minority report at Exhibit P. The following additional documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit G. Record of Proceeding, w/atchs, dated 17 Aug 04. Exhibit P. Minority Report RITA S. LOONEY Panel Chair MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS (AFBCMR) SUBJECT: AFBCMR Application of XXXXXXX, BC-2004-01344 The Board majority has accepted the recommendation of AFLSA/JAJM to...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02156
A Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) was convened in Nov 01 in accordance with Air Force policy and initially returned the applicant to duty based on his only having a singe seizure episode and being recurrence free without medication for three months. Based on stable, seizure free epilepsy, the IPEB rated the applicant’s seizure disorder at 10% and controlled by medication according to guidance in the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). ...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-03536
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-03536 INDEX CODE: 110.00 XXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His dishonorable discharge be upgraded to a general (under honorable conditions) discharge. The applicant is not contending any specific actions have been taken by reviewing authorities that require correction of his...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00942
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005- 00942 INDEX CODE: 100.06; 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 20 SEPTEMBER 2006 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code of “2Y” be changed so that she can reenter the military as an officer. At this time SrA XXXXXXXX is not qualified to assume greater...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02492
The applicant was discharged effective 21 May 2002 with an uncharacterized entry-level separation with a separation code JDA (fraudulent entry into military service) and a reentry code of 2C (entry level separation without characterization of service). _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPAE reviewed the applicant’s case file and concludes that the RE code of 2C is correct. ...